RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @doreshtsedek: New CDC study - Bivalent boosted cohort reverts immune system to unvaccinated levels (at least temporarily). Courtesy Dr.…
RT @tatiann69922625: Le CDC a publié des données sur le nouveau booster bivalent et il ne semble pas bon à 2-3 mois. Ils ont utilisé une co…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
📈📉
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @JReinerMD: First real world data of the effectiveness of bivalent mRNA vaccines in preventing symptomatic COVID Infection. https://t.c…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @MorrisMay: @unclebuckQPR @GentClassical absolutely shocking VE (vaccine efficiency)...snake oil might have even better efficiency...oh…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
So WHY is #BonnieHenry creating 6 month wait for Bivalent Booster? Yup she's Studying BC Population Again #bcpoli @CKNW Why Twitter giving PH Info that after 91.5 days,can get Booster? It's Dr Ballem's Job to Communicate to Public for $750K taxpayer salary
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
@unclebuckQPR @GentClassical absolutely shocking VE (vaccine efficiency)...snake oil might have even better efficiency...oh wait a minute 🤔
RT @NathanLo3579: New observational data on vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic case of #COVID19 for bivalent booster vaccines. https…
RT @celinegounder: 1/ @CDC released a new @MMWR report today on the effectiveness of the updated bivalent COVID boosters. https://t.co/xhd…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
@Karl_Lauterbach
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
New CDC study - Bivalent boosted cohort reverts immune system to unvaccinated levels (at least temporarily). Courtesy Dr. Meyrl Nass https://t.co/RdQv8ziZJk https://t.co/A8DPRwr9Pg
RT @JReinerMD: First real world data of the effectiveness of bivalent mRNA vaccines in preventing symptomatic COVID Infection. https://t.c…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
@EricTopol @PLOSMedicine What do you think?🤷 https://t.co/pBg6vRUIrb
This 👇 but they keep promoting the shots anyway. Wonder why...
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @tatiann69922625: Le CDC a publié des données sur le nouveau booster bivalent et il ne semble pas bon à 2-3 mois. Ils ont utilisé une co…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @fgidf98fj9jh0h: やれやれ。 CDCgovは、新しい2価のブースターのデータを発表したが、2-3ヶ月ではあまり良くないようだ。 彼らはテスト陰性設計を使用したため、2価のブースターを使用した人はテストの閾値が低く、VEは65歳以上で20-30%しかない…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
RT @fgidf98fj9jh0h: やれやれ。 CDCgovは、新しい2価のブースターのデータを発表したが、2-3ヶ月ではあまり良くないようだ。 彼らはテスト陰性設計を使用したため、2価のブースターを使用した人はテストの閾値が低く、VEは65歳以上で20-30%しかない…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @tatiann69922625: Le CDC a publié des données sur le nouveau booster bivalent et il ne semble pas bon à 2-3 mois. Ils ont utilisé une co…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
Due to waning immunity of monovalent doses, benefit of bivalent booster increased with time since receipt of the most recent monovalent vaccine dose. All persons should stay up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccinations, including bivalent booster dose
In this study of vaccine effectiveness of the U.S.-authorized bivalent mRNA booster formulations, bivalent boosters provided significant additional protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in persons who had previously received 2, 3, or 4 monova
Monovalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were less effective against symptomatic infection during the period of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant predominance.
Effectiveness of Bivalent mRNA Vaccines in Preventing Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection — Increasing Community Access to Testing Program, United States, September–November 2022 https://t.co/8S9ficBcWd
Aber #AchtMäuse können doch nicht irren!
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
Effectiveness of Bivalent mRNA Vaccines in Preventing Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection - Increasing Community Access to Testing Program, United States, September-November 2022 https://t.co/ymbfwHRPmL #COVID19BivantVaccine
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
Effectiveness of Bivalent mRNA Vaccines in Preventing Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection - Increasing Community Access to Testing Program, United States, September-November 2022 https://t.co/LBNg9MhovD #COVID19BivantVaccine
CDC 已經發布了有關新的二價助推器的數據,並且在 2-3 個月內看起來不太好。 他們使用了負面的測試設計,所以如果角色被💉bivalent 提升,很可能*高*估計了有效性
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @tatiann69922625: Le CDC a publié des données sur le nouveau booster bivalent et il ne semble pas bon à 2-3 mois. Ils ont utilisé une co…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
Effectiveness of Bivalent mRNA Vaccines in Preventing Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection - Increasing Community Access to Testing Program, United States, September-November 2022 https://t.co/bDpyB2BLKD #COVID19BivantVaccine
CDC. On continue à détourner la vérité sur le booster bivalent.
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
RT @tatiann69922625: Le CDC a publié des données sur le nouveau booster bivalent et il ne semble pas bon à 2-3 mois. Ils ont utilisé une co…
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
Le CDC a publié des données sur le nouveau booster bivalent et il ne semble pas bon à 2-3 mois. Ils ont utilisé une conception de test négative, il est donc très probable que *sur*estime l'efficacité si les perso boostées par le 💉bivalent 😏😔⬇️ https://t.c
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
The longer the gap since the last shot, the greater the protection received. Boosters taken at 3 months were less effective than those after an 8 month gap. Note: No mention of severe outcomes in either group. 2/2 https://t.co/a0rckrbUwM
RT @soncharm: is the fact that the latest and greatest flavor of injection probably doesn’t really help anything (at best) gonna permeate i…
Great thread here
RT @Metabo_PhD: Vaccine efficacy of the new bivalent mRNA CV19 booster in people 65 years & older (the age group most vulnerable to CV19 &…
RT @fgidf98fj9jh0h: やれやれ。 CDCgovは、新しい2価のブースターのデータを発表したが、2-3ヶ月ではあまり良くないようだ。 彼らはテスト陰性設計を使用したため、2価のブースターを使用した人はテストの閾値が低く、VEは65歳以上で20-30%しかない…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @JReinerMD: First real world data of the effectiveness of bivalent mRNA vaccines in preventing symptomatic COVID Infection. https://t.c…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @mahesh_shenai: https://t.co/mVcJrbKQzQ Quite literally in this MMWR, they report only 22-28% absolute VE in 50-65yos... ...then later…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…