At least they are saying it; acknowledging is an important step.
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
3 / 3 Effectiveness of Bivalent mRNA Vaccines in Preventing Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection — Increasing Community Access to Testing Program, US, Sept–Nov 2022 "The findings in this study are subject to at least 6 limitations." https://t.co/6rAsSXCEBp
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @zin_zah: In this study of vaccine effectiveness of ... mRNA booster formulations, ... bivalent boosters provided significant additional…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @zin_zah: In this study of vaccine effectiveness of ... mRNA booster formulations, ... bivalent boosters provided significant additional…
@JeffereyJaxen
Coronavirus = common cold mRNA inhibits normal immune function and has hundreds of side effects, including death
What the hell does that mean? Obviously the science is crystal clear, like mud.
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
Replying to @RIHEALTH ICYMI
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
@TheNickFoy Help! Some random dude just popped up in my feed but he's also a doctor. I don't know what to do! https://t.co/nk7cDTrjN3
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated persons might have different behaviors or a fundamentally different risk" "..findings in this study are subject to at least six limitations
Due to waning immunity of monovalent doses, the benefit of the bivalent booster increased with time since receipt of the most recent monovalent vaccine dose. https://t.co/cybbdGrZcO
In this study of vaccine effectiveness of ... mRNA booster formulations, ... bivalent boosters provided significant additional protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in persons who had previously received 2, 3, or 4 monovalent vaccine doses.
PLEASE ELDERLY BEWARE OF THIS TOXIC BOOSTER! It nearly killed my Dad & made his Parkinson's worse & he is NOT the same man! It caused a brain bleed, hallucinations & fall fracturing his hip & femur! We're on day 33 in hosp. from this nightm
https://t.co/syWfFD5dn7 Quick takes from new MMWR study on bivalent efficacy (after a monovalent series): 1. Modest <50% efficacy overall, vs. unvaxxed 2. Trend to 🔽efficacy w/ more prior monovalent boosts 3. 🔽efficacy in older age group #bivalent,
Effectiveness of Bivalent mRNA Vaccines in Preventing Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection - Increasing Community Access to Testing Program, United States, September-November 2022 (Cdcmmwr / Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) https://t.co/IJHxvKJKZc
Now super duper sized and available by drive-thru! Tippytop Reputable Federal Healthcare Agency Golden Seal of Approvel https://t.co/4iXg19GVyR
RT @PasadenaGov: Find an updated #COVID19 booster near you: https://t.co/OgJ7A12wEp
Be aware of some rare side effects. Uveitis is real and occuring in some people, though it is rare.
RT @Alexander_Tin: New in @CDCMMWR: our first look at effectiveness of updated bivalent boosters relative to 2 monovalent shots against s…
Find an updated #COVID19 booster near you: https://t.co/OgJ7A12wEp
I’m good, so kindly piss off.
Oh great
@venkmurthy And look here: https://t.co/DwQr82AtQ9 New MMWR study on bivalent booster VE, modest at best -- yet coupled with a blanket recommendation for all.
RT @mahesh_shenai: https://t.co/mVcJrbKQzQ Quite literally in this MMWR, they report only 22-28% absolute VE in 50-65yos... ...then later…
RT @mahesh_shenai: https://t.co/mVcJrbKQzQ Quite literally in this MMWR, they report only 22-28% absolute VE in 50-65yos... ...then later…
👀Bivalent #boosters provided significant additional protection against symptomatic #SARSCoV2 infection in persons who had previously received 2, 3, or 4 monovalent vaccine doses. 💉💉🦠📉🙏🏻https://t.co/F2RqFi15zD
https://t.co/mVcJrbKQzQ Quite literally in this MMWR, they report only 22-28% absolute VE in 50-65yos... ...then later conclude this is "significant additional protection" and recommend ALL PERSONS should get bivalent boosters after 2 mos. from last dose
RT @mahesh_shenai: https://t.co/mVcJrbKQzQ Quick takes from new MMWR study on bivalent efficacy (after a monovalent series): 1. Modest <…
RT @mahesh_shenai: https://t.co/mVcJrbKQzQ Quick takes from new MMWR study on bivalent efficacy (after a monovalent series): 1. Modest <…
RT @DocJeffD: "...bivalent mRNA booster formulations, bivalent boosters provided significant additional protection against symptomatic SARS…
RT @bhrenton: New today: First efficacy estimates against symptomatic COVID-19 in bivalent boosted people: - Bivalent boosters increased p…
New today: First efficacy estimates against symptomatic COVID-19 in bivalent boosted people: - Bivalent boosters increased protection regardless of number of previous doses received - Proterction higher with more time since most recent monovalent dose htt
RT @W7VOA: Here's the study Dr. Fauci just referenced during his likely final appearance in the @WhiteHouse briefing room. https://t.co/bWG…
https://t.co/mVcJrbKQzQ Quick takes from new MMWR study on bivalent efficacy (after a monovalent series): 1. Modest <50% efficacy overall, vs. unvaxxed 2. Trend to 🔽efficacy w/ more prior monovalent boosts 3. 🔽efficacy in older age group Not impress
@DamonLinker I believe that the latest data is that it still reduces infection by around 50 percent. So I don't think that it's wrong to say that it protects the community. We've said similar thinga about the flu vaccine which has similar infecti protecti
https://t.co/mVcJrbKQzQ New MMWR study reporting VE in bivalent boosters. Modest <50% efficacy at best, and worse in older ages. More to analysis come . . . https://t.co/1jJXI19CC7
RT @Alexander_Tin: New in @CDCMMWR: our first look at effectiveness of updated bivalent boosters relative to 2 monovalent shots against s…
New data on fouth dose (bivalent) seem to be not so good https://t.co/1xNEz48FCZ https://t.co/46ufLqSeVp