RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @Neoavatara: Why can't we have an honest debate about this?
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @kaveri59872487: Say it with me now: (Sesame Street voice)…m…a..s,,,k..mask!
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
Say it with me now: (Sesame Street voice)…m…a..s,,,k..mask!
RT @Neoavatara: Why can't we have an honest debate about this?
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @SukunaBikona7: 従来型2回以上接種と比較した従来型2回以上接種+2価ワクチン1回接種の相対的な発症予防効果(最終の従来型接種から2-3ヶ月→8ヶ月以上)は18-49歳30%→56%、50-64歳31%→48%、65歳以上28%→43%。 https://t…
I saw a release by front line doctors that the bivallent shot is 16% effective. I gather at preventing ARDS and death in a 2% or so risk group. They also said mRNA flu shot isn't approved in any way. They just skipped that part so best to say no to the biv
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @SukunaBikona7: 従来型2回以上接種と比較した従来型2回以上接種+2価ワクチン1回接種の相対的な発症予防効果(最終の従来型接種から2-3ヶ月→8ヶ月以上)は18-49歳30%→56%、50-64歳31%→48%、65歳以上28%→43%。 https://t…
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @AAPSonline: Receiving more doses does not seem to add much to vaccine efficacy as far as prevention of infection. Not to mention there…
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
@CDPHE may want to read this MMWR re: VE first. Laughable that you are pushing this. https://t.co/CnK7k6Dbgy
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2価のメリットあるんでしょうかね。 https://t.co/hhCieRsMLA https://t.co/K2UrgJi3le
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @Neoavatara: Why can't we have an honest debate about this?
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @SukunaBikona7: 従来型2回以上接種と比較した従来型2回以上接種+2価ワクチン1回接種の相対的な発症予防効果(最終の従来型接種から2-3ヶ月→8ヶ月以上)は18-49歳30%→56%、50-64歳31%→48%、65歳以上28%→43%。 https://t…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @AAPSonline: Receiving more doses does not seem to add much to vaccine efficacy as far as prevention of infection. Not to mention there…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @SukunaBikona7: 従来型2回以上接種と比較した従来型2回以上接種+2価ワクチン1回接種の相対的な発症予防効果(最終の従来型接種から2-3ヶ月→8ヶ月以上)は18-49歳30%→56%、50-64歳31%→48%、65歳以上28%→43%。 https://t…
RT @SukunaBikona7: 従来型2回以上接種と比較した従来型2回以上接種+2価ワクチン1回接種の相対的な発症予防効果(最終の従来型接種から2-3ヶ月→8ヶ月以上)は18-49歳30%→56%、50-64歳31%→48%、65歳以上28%→43%。 https://t…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…