RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @tatiann69922625: Le CDC a publié des données sur le nouveau booster bivalent et il ne semble pas bon à 2-3 mois. Ils ont utilisé une co…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @DrTomFrieden: For those who were looking for further evidence of the importance of an Omicron booster, here it is! Even if you’ve been…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @tatiann69922625: Le CDC a publié des données sur le nouveau booster bivalent et il ne semble pas bon à 2-3 mois. Ils ont utilisé une co…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @jjohana: L'autorité de santé américaine, la CDC, vient de sortir des données d'efficacité (test positif au Covid) des nouveaux boosters…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @Alexander_Tin: New in @CDCMMWR: our first look at effectiveness of updated bivalent boosters relative to 2 monovalent shots against s…
RT @GJLAScoop: As we seek comfort around our chosen family during this time, here is a gentle reminder to keep each other safe & protected…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @DrTomFrieden: For those who were looking for further evidence of the importance of an Omicron booster, here it is! Even if you’ve been…
RT @juliocroda: Primeiro estudo de vida real: https://t.co/nwBVjlzxR9
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Yes, @jakescottMD 1 concern about CDC MMWR paper is that VE based on + PCR tests (those boosted most likely to test) but…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Yes, @jakescottMD 1 concern about CDC MMWR paper is that VE based on + PCR tests (those boosted most likely to test) but…
Yes, @jakescottMD 1 concern about CDC MMWR paper is that VE based on + PCR tests (those boosted most likely to test) but agree - again & again, studies showing longer period between prior infection or prior booster to next boosts VE (would do 6 months)
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @SaadOmer3: Do bivalent boosters provide added value beyond 2+ doses of COVID vaccines? New CDC case-control study says yes. Specificall…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
Do bivalent boosters provide added value beyond 2+ doses of COVID vaccines? New CDC case-control study says yes. Specifically, relative Vaccine Effectiveness was: 28%-30%, 2-3 months after last monovalent dose. 43%-56%, 8 months after last monovalent dose.
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @JReinerMD: First real world data of the effectiveness of bivalent mRNA vaccines in preventing symptomatic COVID Infection. https://t.c…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
Good news. If you haven't gotten your bivalent COVID booster, you should get it as soon as you're eligible.
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @sri_srikrishna: Glass half full?🥃 CDC says bivalent booster 🚀better than no boost 💤 (40-60% rVE) but still high risk of infection🦠even…
RT @RajeevJayadevan: The longer the gap since the last shot, the greater the protection received. Boosters taken at 3 months were less effe…
Bivalent covid boosters more effective at *preventing infection* than expected! If you've not had jab in >8 months, bivalent booster halves your risk of infection! (Big part of why that number isn't higher is your existing immunity still doing decent jo
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @DrTomFrieden: For those who were looking for further evidence of the importance of an Omicron booster, here it is! Even if you’ve been…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @jjohana: L'autorité de santé américaine, la CDC, vient de sortir des données d'efficacité (test positif au Covid) des nouveaux boosters…
RT @DrTomFrieden: For those who were looking for further evidence of the importance of an Omicron booster, here it is! Even if you’ve been…
I guess this explains why we'll only get Covid vax once a year-- Effectiveness of Bivalent mRNA Vaccines in Preventing Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection — Increasing Community Access to Testing Program, United States, September–November 2022 https://t.co/1
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @DrTomFrieden: For those who were looking for further evidence of the importance of an Omicron booster, here it is! Even if you’ve been…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
New CDC study: "bivalent boosters provided significant additional protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in persons who had previously received 2, 3, or 4 monovalent vaccine doses." https://t.co/xXpEaBPOgh. Get the booster!
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @Alexander_Tin: New in @CDCMMWR: our first look at effectiveness of updated bivalent boosters relative to 2 monovalent shots against s…
RT @EthelMaciel: Quando estamos estudando uma doença nova é assim: a cada nova pesquisa temos novas evidências. O CDC acaba de publicar o p…
RT @DrTomFrieden: For those who were looking for further evidence of the importance of an Omicron booster, here it is! Even if you’ve been…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @DrTomFrieden: For those who were looking for further evidence of the importance of an Omicron booster, here it is! Even if you’ve been…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @DrTomFrieden: For those who were looking for further evidence of the importance of an Omicron booster, here it is! Even if you’ve been…
RT @DrTomFrieden: For those who were looking for further evidence of the importance of an Omicron booster, here it is! Even if you’ve been…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
@Vaxmaxxed @Gwensday3 @themig29 @rubin_allergy Happy to do so. There's quite a few. Let's start with this one. A study of the new bi-valent booster. It shows no benefit at all. Enjoy. I'll post more soon. https://t.co/ZVNoGDPV6Q
🤓So don't vax 20 times a year wait looooong esp after infection
RT @ramos262740691: 【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
@elonmusk This is “disinformation.”
RT @DrTomFrieden: For those who were looking for further evidence of the importance of an Omicron booster, here it is! Even if you’ve been…
You could not pay me a million $$! My Dad would do ANYTHING to go back & NOT take this poison that nearly killed him & landed in the hosp for 33 days! You ruined his remaining quality of life you deviant bastards of death. So fuck you & fuck yo
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
One thing that’s clear from this bivalent booster analysis is that relative effectiveness is better after a longer interval between doses, which is consistent with what’s known from vaccine immunology. @MonicaGandhi9 @MichaelDaignau3 https://t.co/eZOWDo5s
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @DrTomFrieden: For those who were looking for further evidence of the importance of an Omicron booster, here it is! Even if you’ve been…
RT @morilyn1123: 米国でのBA.4/5用2価ワクチンの発症予防効果。まだ接種1-2か月の結果ですね。 年代別、前回の従来型接種からの期間別、これまでの接種回数別に有効性が示されています。3回目接種から間もない場合ほぼ上乗せなし(10-20%)…ということは、2…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…