@gerdosi Also if you have time would you mind to take a look at https://t.co/CbMjkZeBmp and the papers they refer (i have only read 2 cases out of lab enviroment but they have more https://t.co/nLh43ZBp0U and https://t.co/YHkLo1dm8g ). dont this ones show
A follow up report by the CDC showed that despite the stylists being Covid +, there was no spread (lack of spread was attributed to proper mask use): https://t.co/LIr1RvUtky
@javicmuniz i guess if california had ANY kind of reliable contact tracing system, we’d know what were actual hotspots and wouldn’t have to just guess what to shut down... meanwhile: https://t.co/6VRx5zOoik
@realtruthcactus @Sir_KnowlesCBE @TexAg0892 @michaeljknowles Just gonna leave three real scientific studies on mask wearing for you to consider: https://t.co/KbjZJbWiwN https://t.co/0UyfAT8L5w https://t.co/PbRBImtLSj
@rbrt__o Yes, you are right. An important paper for the power of masking (139 clients exposed, none got sick, 67 tested and those negative): https://t.co/VWyAINTH7a
@liberty_dane Så et kort, midlertidigt påbud, der nedsætter smittespredningen med op til 13% på 10 dage er "minimal effekt"? #dkpol https://t.co/hAapCPV4Xm
@davidakirkwood1 @NatalieSuB CDC: "Among 139 clients exposed to 2 symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both the stylists & the clients wore face masks, no symptomatic 2ndary cases were reported; among 67 clients tested for SARS-CoV-2
@SVL_1971 @Desirecharlott1 Zie mijn andere tweet. Kappers zijn niet meer besmet dan hun klanten (NL). Bemette kappers hebben het virus niet overgedragen (USA). https://t.co/lEkcQdXpVC
@Desirecharlott1 @SVL_1971 Een mooi staaltje Belgenvirologie. Evidence based medicine zoekt feiten. 1- Zijn kappers meer en vaker besmet? Niet in Nederland. Klanten besmetten dus niet hun kappers. 2- Hebben besmette kappers hun klanten besmet? Niet in de U
@topshelfsauce13 @ImNoseworthy @SeanHouse90 @GovWhitmer Or, more research showing that barbers are not the risk factor that they were initially thought to be. https://t.co/APdknBR9Mc
@kenmo757 @MrAndyNgo The idea is that if you have it, and wear a mask, you're not projecting as far to the people around you. It's just like covering a cough or sneeze. And it does work. From July: In Missouri, 2 infected hairdressers, 139 customers, 67 t
Here, for example, I pointed to numerous studies on masks which show their benefit, and more have been done since (one recently on cloth https://t.co/2uWetcEgZ3) while Ivor coincidentally refers to such as "toilet papers" and reversed his position https:/
Here’s a nice article if you all want to feel good about getting your hair done and about how effective face coverings are https://t.co/85mcAm2wcO
@auntbec15 I still wouldn't go... https://t.co/e442GlInux
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/JUq9qrq4bz via @CDCgov
@JAFOOFAJ @1chicklette @kmc1213 Oof, I can/can’t imagine. Masks are good, though, as a frontline of defense (obvs not the whole story). You’ve probably seen or heard of this study. (In my mind, you work at Nordstrom. 🙂 I’m not asking - just saying.) htt
I am less concerned that I have become that person that notices on how a study was cited in (checks notes) The New York Times and sends my fact check, than that data from these studies that I read has taken up space in my brain and won’t leave. 🤦🏻♀️
@nytimes I actually found two errors in this story. 1. In the salon example, only 58 of the 139 clients agreed to be tested. 72 refused. It is a noted limitation of the results. Some may have caught, they just don’t know. (1/2) https://t.co/ZAJo6jl3gQ
@GinLessIsMore So frustrating But one caveat Just so you have the info regardless of what you decide https://t.co/ocYVsgKNZi
@GinLessIsMore Do what you are comfortable with......here is an article from the CDC that applies to this situation. I work in an office with masks and not able to socially distance. Everyone has to research and make the best decisions for themselves.
@JuliaHB1 Imbecile. https://t.co/3fgmPYQrP1
RT @Spoonhead8: "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both the stylists & the clients w…
RT @Spoonhead8: @DaleWil39870290 @JuliaHB1 That's from May. The below is from September. Science moves forward. https://t.co/UQbi5TlhXG
@DaleWil39870290 @JuliaHB1 That's from May. The below is from September. Science moves forward. https://t.co/UQbi5TlhXG
Proof that masks work and businesses did NOT have to close when masks are mandatory....https://t.co/flKoy7Wwle
@RealCDurks @Thinkingmom19 @roccogalatilaw to the studies of the NIH and CDC. "Consistent and correct use of face coverings, when appropriate, is an important tool for minimizing spread of SARS-CoV-2 from presymptomatic, asymptomatic, and symptomatic perso
RT @Spoonhead8: @Jan24827157 @padfootcare @Saffiya_Khan1 "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-1…
RT @Spoonhead8: @Jan24827157 @padfootcare @Saffiya_Khan1 "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-1…
@Jan24827157 @padfootcare @Saffiya_Khan1 "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both the stylists & the clients wore face masks, no symptomatic secondary cases were reported; among 67 clients tested fo
Science...
@DrKimSue Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@nypost Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@j0ssef2 Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@RiderBabe52 Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@mikewasson There was this: https://t.co/P7CdXcw4vC
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@kevin_willetts @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Maybe he read this: Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@BOYCOTT_ELITE @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@lokimickeysull1 @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@Stevie_Nip @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@RayB03892178 @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@Damnyankee_la @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Did you know better and know about this? Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@rottenchester @NYGovCuomo @melissadderosa Yes, I watched too. They clearly had not been following the news here and were unprepared for this obvious question. We know masks work in salons - and NY has strict protocols. https://t.co/KcLoUo6yf4
@Chris_Chapman61 @ScottishJenbel @cushyglen @thehistoryguy Hi, what is going to be an acceptable source for you? https://t.co/Yu2aEU2uja
@highfries @TheFlatEartherr @Nerdy_Marc @FullFact "Among 139 clients exposed to 2 symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both stylists & the clients wore face masks, no symptomatic secondary cases were reported; among 67 clients tested
RT @DrGomi: @crouzet @DBlameble @LehmannDrC @DidierPittet @BAG_OFSP_UFSP @alain_berset ni celui ci , qui est intéressant : est ce que les c…
Recuerda siempre las 3 M cuando estés en un entorno comunitario https://t.co/UwTIzTiPrV
@jhaskinscabrera And then you have the anecdotal hairdresser saloon story, ehm , study https://t.co/ie1munZCFu
RT @DrGomi: @crouzet @DBlameble @LehmannDrC @DidierPittet @BAG_OFSP_UFSP @alain_berset ni celui ci , qui est intéressant : est ce que les c…
@crouzet @DBlameble @LehmannDrC @DidierPittet @BAG_OFSP_UFSP @alain_berset ni celui ci , qui est intéressant : est ce que les clients ont eu des contacts infectants potentiels , et pourquoi personne n a été conatminé ? https://t.co/iBO1fPkJdI
@GoingMedieval @hoaxeye Now at £27k. I don't see how this is about disinformation. Seems more like defiance to me. How good is the information that her operation of the salon is dangerous enough to warrant the fines? https://t.co/NFrF3cd6xX
@JudgeClayJ “Asymptomatic carriers don’t spread infection.” https://t.co/gmiqikOTVK “Exposure doesn’t mean death; doesn’t even mean illness.” https://t.co/WI4wo8esR1
The experience reminded me of this study of two Georgia hairdressers who were COVID+ and did not infect any of their clients. They wore masks. https://t.co/kKKIzh4EZz
@pucksglen @asymmetricinfo Here’s one helpful analysis tending prove the efficacy of masks in reducing the virus in exhaled respiration. https://t.co/XKFq5oFteH
RT @LupenciaB: Esto es lo más estúpid0 que leí. Si UN (UNO) caso fuera suficiente para probar algo, entonces yo q estuve con un contagiado…
@beckystlouis I’m sorry. That’s got to make you very anxious, but maybe you can take comfort in this well-documented case where everyone wore masks and there were no transmissions: https://t.co/j4FhVouJsH
To back up my assertions: https://t.co/R1HvcAme0h https://t.co/SrbFOGokbq https://t.co/5W2u4AKeIs https://t.co/eYS1dUvTee
@russnelson @PerBylund If there's no good evidence that they work, just not in the way you understand, please explain all of this: https://t.co/WOqOLH09ru https://t.co/9X0HmXn9Pp https://t.co/pZYK1tNohJ https://t.co/5i8wzu3SdF
@JeBroo5 @LAURENCEJAMS It’s an anecdote from the Spring that got wide publicity. https://t.co/US3mVPLyaH
@PerBylund @russnelson https://t.co/9X0HmXn9Pp https://t.co/5i8wzu3SdF https://t.co/pZYK1tNohJ Meanwhile this started with your post about a Danish study that was so flawed no medical paper would print it with a faulty premise.
@Sappientissimu1 Same study with more detail. Control population provided...coworkers and family members around same people without masks. https://t.co/hSlfTntB0q
@VilYampier Lee este estudio publicado por el CDC. Dos estilistas que trabajaron enfermad y sintomáticas pero con mascarillas al igual que las clientas y no contagiaron a nadie. https://t.co/e6O7bUZWyH
@Birdyword The problem is, it's trying to quantify a negative - how many people didn't get sick due to wearing masks. BUT there was a natural experiment on this topic, and the answer was: 100%. Alas in US people won't do anything to protect others, just th
@R_Good_Fellow @latimes Thanks for providing the data. 1. Can you please provide the source of all the data you have posted? 2. Please look at this story from two people form Missouri https://t.co/1S32DZUwo0
RT @stdennard: Here are just a few peer reviewed articles + meta analyses on the efficacy of mask use: https://t.co/FHmvcmrP2E https://t.…
@jeffreyatucker, maybe you've already seen this. I find the title hilarious: "The Science behind Masks". But read the "CDC study" linked on that page: https://t.co/7Z4qRaYE3X ...it's even more funny. https://t.co/WB9Kz8NHR0
@aalon @PlumProfessora @ChrysalidesArt @ColleenHuberNMD "Consistent and correct use of face coverings, when appropriate, is an important tool for minimizing spread of SARS-CoV-2 from presymptomatic, asymptomatic, and symptomatic persons." https://t.co/yW3w
@PlumProfessora @mariabronn75 @cplshelly @Max_Gorden "Consistent and correct use of face coverings, when appropriate, is an important tool for minimizing spread of SARS-CoV-2 from presymptomatic, asymptomatic, and symptomatic persons." https://t.co/yW3w102
RT @stdennard: Here are just a few peer reviewed articles + meta analyses on the efficacy of mask use: https://t.co/FHmvcmrP2E https://t.…
Pray you never cross Susan Dennard.
RT @stdennard: Here are just a few peer reviewed articles + meta analyses on the efficacy of mask use: https://t.co/FHmvcmrP2E https://t.…
#WearAMask
RT @stdennard: Here are just a few peer reviewed articles + meta analyses on the efficacy of mask use: https://t.co/FHmvcmrP2E https://t.…
@MaartenvSmeden @NoahHaber Two hairstylists were symptomatic and COVID positive saw around ~130 clients, BOTH stylists and clients wore masks. Following up after encounter; No reported secondary symptomatic cases, among the 67 clients tested all were negat
RT @Spoonhead8: "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both the stylists & the clients w…
RT @Spoonhead8: "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both the stylists & the clients w…