RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
@BallouxFrancois One of the worst may be the “hairdressers study” largely cited by the MSMedia and still on CDC’s site as “evidence” in favour of masks! https://t.co/9jtSbrFya8
@Fubar531 @RepThomasMassie @CDCgov Oh yeah @Fubar531 these large power 😂 studies are EXACTLY how the CDC came to recommend universal masking. If the @CDCgov can do it, so can everyone else. Enjoy the read! https://t.co/pdiKYetpvN The CDC is a joke & F
@guardien_ange https://t.co/VFbW6U9xsq ミズーリ州のにある美容院で働く2人の美容師が新型コロナに感染した。 この2人の美容師に濃厚接触したと考えられる139人の客は全員マスクをつけており、それぞれ15分以上この美容師と濃厚暴露していたと考えられたが、誰も新型コロナには感染していなかった。
@jenneraub Flawed hair dresser "study" used as justification for indoor masking https://t.co/q45PJEOTvR
@NgwinWinston @Justin_Parmer @CDCgov I accept the data point. @CDCgov is pinning its mask effectiveness position on TWO hair stylists who didn’t transmit the virus “because of masking” FTW! https://t.co/lqqbu7xFO6
@hughesjj93 @abiroberts @silversurfer110 @tnewtondunn Standard blue masks reduce risk of someone spreading their infection to others. They were never designed to protect the wearer. https://t.co/cIU7ROpv4m
@NickytaLeb @jakescottMD @MonicaGandhi9 @j_g_allen Dr. Scott has promoted the use of shields + surgical masks instead of N95 masks too! https://t.co/6PfNnXGeTC
@marlene_schaap I agree but understand two hairdressers was literally a large part of why the CDC reversed their position based on decades of research. https://t.co/V3xIGO7Y9V
@marlene_schaap This BS is what the reversed decades of random mixed controlled trials over. https://t.co/5okquq2si4
@W7VOA From 2020: https://t.co/2fSF9W1XSV
RT @aime3verde: This is the relevant study the physician mentions in the video. The CDC sites this study as their highest/top tier evidence…
RT @aime3verde: If you haven’t watched this video I highly recommend you do. It’s about the CDC’s top citation regarding masks. The CDC’s t…
@SecCardona This is right up there with the CDC's "proof" of masks' efficacy that relies on two -- just 2 -- hairdressers who wore masks at work and reported their clients didn't get COVID, thus presenting statistically insignificant results as data. https
@mattravis @BellaPoke https://t.co/jzyiIb03ih One of the studies the CDC used to validate that masks work - straight from the CDC website. An observational study from 2 hairstylists in Springfield, MO with 139 clients in the “study”. Seriously.
@Apostate80 @limeytim @ianbetteridge @bobscartoons Weak observational studies, sneeze slo-mos, anecdotal studies, studies that inferred causation from correlation - I think we'll look back on all these pro mask papers rushed out in 2020 as piss poor scienc
@nogoldenapples No one knows. But there is this, which even antedates vaccination. Just masking helps a LOT. source: https://t.co/Q7TMFUdI05 https://t.co/i7wFFMk4A4
@thehill Also from the CDC are the mask “studies” that were done 2 hair dressers I kid you not 2 https://t.co/TMNLvoOjzE
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
@CEOofHistory @tfknocks @CDCgov @cdc Yet CDC claims statistical significance when it fits its own agenda, as it did for just 2 hairdressers. https://t.co/0jBkLSk4uZ
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
Thank you for pointing all this out. I have been making these same points for over a year now, but to no avail. Because most people are stupid.
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
RT @aime3verde: The CDC’s top study on masks; sample size? 2, yes two. https://t.co/ImNn9zUbE1
RT @aime3verde: This is the relevant study the physician mentions in the video. The CDC sites this study as their highest/top tier evidence…
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
@LibertarianSeth @BobLoblaw3 @Annie_Filkowski Really so many factors at play regarding masking and spread. But they work: https://t.co/8DqyKZhkfx And should be the bare minimum we do to protect our fellow Americans.
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
@Regina091884 @RealCandaceO I could link you to studies that show you're wrong but you'll just ignore them. The biggest one is the hairdresser who had covid, saw 139 clients, and nobody else got sick. Masks work. https://t.co/HuCalyHz3c https://t.co/8DqyK
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
Correct. This is not science!
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
@Svedjebruket Det gör de. Från CDC i USA. https://t.co/YAzFtsSL8b
@cyilmaz @ALPASLA56404421 @serapsimsekyvz Mesela şu araştırma “çalışmalar laboratuar koşullarında her şey steril yapılıyor” diye atanlara cevap niteliğinde: Herkesin maske takması zorunlu bir kuaför salonunda bir hafta iki enfekte personel çalışmasına rağm
@gisele_nieves @KenPaxtonTX https://t.co/lcYzf2QNnl https://t.co/O1Kdy0zdTR Again, someone told you that information was not on the CDC website, expecting you to believe their claims at face value. I am sorry.
@EmiliaHerault @The_Truth_Sir @2020Blueprint @ianmSC @AnnCoulter Just so you don't get lost, the studies were: https://t.co/blymnjrWJC https://t.co/l3eQBxvban https://t.co/lZebqoZ3Yl https://t.co/NDLbG9UtHD https://t.co/ZmaQ7wD9K4 https://t.co/FLldbw9GMI
@EmiliaHerault @The_Truth_Sir @2020Blueprint @ianmSC @AnnCoulter ? I don't even know if you are trying anymore. Are you just spouting random things, hope some will be right? https://t.co/MNoRSo1gN1
@J_Jammer @MicahDAdams @abmoser88 @JoelKatz @NICKIMINAJ They totally don't work. Except for all the studies that show that they do. https://t.co/SOnUsrbo3I https://t.co/qLhcdAMwuS https://t.co/moxqgnq7N1 https://t.co/Vya96IQbdK https://t.co/Lxx6kxH4e0 h
@iamjasonbailey https://t.co/DWCIIdtIgz so what happened to the other 72 people since only 67 tested and those was negative. You end up with more questions than answers in my opinion.
@EmiliaHerault @The_Truth_Sir @2020Blueprint @ianmSC @AnnCoulter Could you please show me what part of these papers are "biased and non-scientific"? I would love to know. https://t.co/blymnjrWJC https://t.co/Ik5LWRCLK6 https://t.co/lZebqoZ3Yl https://t.co/
@Bearocalypse @DuffertTim This is a good place to start with your education about masking. Masks are part of a solution. Not THE solution. https://t.co/j8kF7wMJSd
@NotSheep2020 @CindytheWhite @AurelioMattucci Mattucci is #TerribleForTorrance Get out of here with your BS. I don’t like wearing a mask, but personal health is public health. https://t.co/OGyXGAWcDq You push a selfish, science-denying, me-first agenda.
@JamesSurowiecki There was a study of a MO hair salon where 2 infected cutters did not infect any of the masked customers. I think that's what's driving this relative sense of security; they've seen a study saying it's OK, & there isn't a comparable on
@pozzdan @finndly @Nadtheangel73 @EmmaSTennant @MartinDaubney You're not very good at this Dan. Your own reference quotes "the 95% CIs are compatible with a 46% reduction to a 23% increase in infection." and in answer: https://t.co/YKR183WY0W https://t.
@NatetheLawyer "Human Studies of Masking and SARS-CoV-2 Transmission" section: First is a cohort study of two infected stylists who worked with 139 clients, around 15 minutes per client, everyone masked, no transmission. Nice, but no control group. https:/
@JimConnor1 This is just the lab study’s. You can see situations where a hair stylists had covid and wore a mask and so did their clients and still didn’t spread covid. https://t.co/C86Fdj1r1B Or on an airplane were people had covid but didn’t spread it.
@djliston75 @unhealthytruth @joerogan @OscarDeLaHoya I do, but the very first "proof" that cloth mask work (now debunked by the latest study) the CDC offers on its site is of 2 -- count 'em 2 -- hairdressers. https://t.co/w65im3y67G
@CabaiPanas @SKastenbaum @Timcast You are either lazy, or dishonest, or I need to embrace the power of "and". https://t.co/ieciDTYW3p
@MichaelPByrne1 Here's the great study from the cdc. It and a study of some households in China is all they've got. Sorry I said New Jersey hairdressers, they were in Missouri. This is the most pathetic "data" I've ever seen in support of any medical point
@KaylorChristian @Humble_Analysis @LibertyOne8 Top study on the CDC masking page. There, that took 45 seconds. https://t.co/iO9VNerH4k
@xFreddyi @SouthofthePier @one2dredd @gbosslet What the CDC cites as it’s research on transmission prevention with masks. REALLY great data with an N number that HAS to be taken seriously. https://t.co/pdiKYetpvN
@West_Looper @okayshane_ @CovidiotSupreme @greatesteverMD What about the hairdresser study, they’re very proud of this one: https://t.co/OSlJfGhD8R
@jowusupaddy1 @RealistToner76 @Supernautiloid @KimIversenShow https://t.co/3ivLwY96Fe It was estimated average pre delta infection inoculum to be 10^3 to 10^5. Delta is probably 10^1
@z0sixxer @SchrockStar @GreggDoyelStar Hey dumbfucks what about this one? Any comment on this one? https://t.co/duSW5d8IbT
RT @aime3verde: The CDC’s top study on masks; sample size? 2, yes two. https://t.co/ImNn9zUbE1
RT @aime3verde: This is the relevant study the physician mentions in the video. The CDC sites this study as their highest/top tier evidence…
@TDDUPGaming @JasonRomano @business @ScottGottliebMD https://t.co/rEwsV4AOHn It's the first in the list that they use. Less than 200 subjects. The CDC rejected the actual scientific study (3000+ participants) from Europe that showed masks made little dif
RT @YoSoyCoco_: Dato, no relato: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con #COVID19 atendieron 139 clientes en 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventil…
Dato, no relato: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con #COVID19 atendieron 139 clientes en 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventilación, pero con barbijo las dos partes. Hubo CERO contagios. Estudio publicado por el CDC: https://t.co/kG7WtfdDaq #GobiernoDeInútile
RT @aime3verde: The CDC’s top study on masks; sample size? 2, yes two. https://t.co/ImNn9zUbE1
This reminds me of the amazing natural experiment of a Texas hair salon last year- two stylists had covid, all wore masks, little to no spread. We NEED to wear masks. https://t.co/kc6cHLxDne
RT @PezeshkiCharles: Saving for later. https://t.co/Tc9DhSGocZ
@McDoubleDad Thanks - and here is the article I mentioned https://t.co/0PWXpUUiEg https://t.co/w0MLwxjRuG
@R_Barnes407 Right, but that’s not a problem inherent of masks themselves, but of the people wearing them. All things being equal, improperly worn masks are better than no masks at all. I’m always annoyingly spouting this anecdote as to their benefit https
@Spanx_by_OBJ @TheVirginQueen6 @WiseAndFly @_IsaiahMcKenzie @danfetes @NFL Anecdotal- articles of Covid+ people, before getting tested, wearing masks at their job not being the source of another's infection despite seeing 100s of people that day https://
RT @aime3verde: This is the relevant study the physician mentions in the video. The CDC sites this study as their highest/top tier evidence…