Toch grappig dat België hierin een eiland blijkt... verschillende onderzoeken spreken dit artikel tegen (zoals deze van de CDC https://t.co/WT7i6hmE3Z) maar toch houdt men in België vast aan hun eigen gefabriceerd onderzoek en dan verwonderd zijn dat men h
@laurenlapkus I have survived four haircuts where both barber and myself wore coverings. It can be done. CDC’s banner story/study on mask effectiveness surrounds getting a cut. https://t.co/8nOuJh3afI
@VMSwiderski No empirical evidence? Two Great Clips hairstylists who tested positive for Covid-19 and wore masks did not pass it on to any of their 139 customers. https://t.co/Rg5CBFS2WF
@PadresWes Who has died getting a haircut? We knew early that masks work. https://t.co/uqCvkwDmFT
RT @NancyRHM: @GendlinsMuse @AldermanHopkins @kprather88 For me it was the study of 2 sick hair stylists who cut hair for 139 clients over…
RT @NancyRHM: @GendlinsMuse @AldermanHopkins @kprather88 For me it was the study of 2 sick hair stylists who cut hair for 139 clients over…
RT @NancyRHM: @GendlinsMuse @AldermanHopkins @kprather88 For me it was the study of 2 sick hair stylists who cut hair for 139 clients over…
@Dalesdweller @Drift0r Here’s another example with hair dressers in Missouri. They had COVID but didn’t spread it to others- everyone was wearing a mask https://t.co/dsBNmjz3ue
RT @NancyRHM: @GendlinsMuse @AldermanHopkins @kprather88 For me it was the study of 2 sick hair stylists who cut hair for 139 clients over…
RT @NancyRHM: @GendlinsMuse @AldermanHopkins @kprather88 For me it was the study of 2 sick hair stylists who cut hair for 139 clients over…
Wear a 😷
RT @NancyRHM: @GendlinsMuse @AldermanHopkins @kprather88 For me it was the study of 2 sick hair stylists who cut hair for 139 clients over…
RT @NancyRHM: @GendlinsMuse @AldermanHopkins @kprather88 For me it was the study of 2 sick hair stylists who cut hair for 139 clients over…
RT @NancyRHM: @GendlinsMuse @AldermanHopkins @kprather88 For me it was the study of 2 sick hair stylists who cut hair for 139 clients over…
@GendlinsMuse @AldermanHopkins @kprather88 For me it was the study of 2 sick hair stylists who cut hair for 139 clients over ~week. Stylists and clients wore masks at all times. Zero transmission. https://t.co/lPZwfurclq
@scotttopia @RubinReport @CNN 8/8 An actual study from the CDC https://t.co/2QuW4hyPRg Also a meta-analysis from the end of last year https://t.co/XId18MJPCi ‘In general, wearing a mask was associated with a significantly reduced risk of COVID-19 infection
@datukhensem The problem when those in power don’t like to read research papers https://t.co/j1YaOcagfw
RT @GirlwithaGoat: @MatthewJshow @WhiteHouse @POTUS Sure! Here's a TINY sampling! https://t.co/9utORbNu7v https://t.co/rUSOvSb7UC https…
@MatthewJshow @WhiteHouse @POTUS Sure! Here's a TINY sampling! https://t.co/9utORbNu7v https://t.co/rUSOvSb7UC https://t.co/L5maSaBQfD https://t.co/L1C7SOgDr1 https://t.co/VtJPVBbH0N
@MatthewJshow @WhiteHouse @POTUS Sure! Here's a TINY sampling! https://t.co/9utORbNu7v https://t.co/rUSOvSb7UC https://t.co/L5maSaBQfD https://t.co/VtJPVBbH0N
@MatthewJshow @WhiteHouse @POTUS Sure! Here's a TINY sampling! https://t.co/9utORbNu7v https://t.co/wmDPPOmwGn https://t.co/EYN7Nfuy1C https://t.co/V9cujPIDdA
@Yenesa2012 @Sharleenannycke @Lizzy_Almeida @lesfilmsabc @Azulbleue https://t.co/zjNrsHiNj5 https://t.co/7gt9ooaTJL Aide à la réduction de la dissémination de l'infection -> Moins de mort + confinement non nécessaire. Si les précautions sont correcteme
@gerdosi @deepquest oh not a chinese study look a US study https://t.co/JknT7JHaXm
@QuietOb83023773 @contrarian4data @mcfunny @PlumProfessora @crabb_vicki @thereal_truther @PaulVCooper1 @JaiKanta22 @mamasaurusMeg @WeareLions3 @eliowa @WholesalerH @justin_hart @Loretta_Torrago Doesn't stand for the mannequin study I posted. Regardless,
RT @infect_prevent: @jgYgritte @RS_Eng_Brain @a_rosenfelder Ein wenig perfide finde ich dies Aussage schon, jetzt Kinder auszuspielen gegen…
@SteeleDaddy So this is actually the article that convinced me states should open back up: https://t.co/PvyWBcHX7Q COVID used to scare the piss out of me. After this dropped and I read through it, I switched over to the boat of "Oh, this isn't a big deal,
RT @casualle_gaimer: WEAR. 👏 YOUR. 👏 DAMN. 👏 MASKS. https://t.co/5vsHc6AJ48
@simonkensington @SplinterPhotog @LozzaFox @dailystar It doesn't mention that vape particles are far smaller than the droplets in which the virus is suspended. Even then you can see that it blocks the forward trajectory of the vape particles. CDC report o
@StephenJohnEll1 @AlexStarling77 @AllieHBNews @MichaelPDeacon Meanwhile, actual medical journal articles https://t.co/KVeiWHMrhk
RT @BusyDrT: Exposure doesn't mean Illness, never mind death! Read the actual non biased #CovidScience Absence of Apparent Transmission of…
COVID-19の症状がある美容師2人が139人に接客したが、マスクをしていたので客への感染はゼロ 美容師と客は #不織布マスク か #布マスク を付けており、布マスクの割合がやや多かった 素材によらず、マスクの効果はある #ウレタンマスク #ポリエステルマスク https://t.co/PPuKJ0AkEm
RT @FOHMaster: @StuddOliver @CommUnityLndn @scientificecon @WHO The Hong Kong hamster study proved they do, albeit not 100% efficacy. For t…
@StuddOliver @CommUnityLndn @scientificecon @WHO The Hong Kong hamster study proved they do, albeit not 100% efficacy. For that, you need to combine masks with Ivermectin weekly at 12mg. Anecdotal proof masking BOTH sick and well works: https://t.co/3ivLw
新型コロナに感染・発症していた2人の美容師が、症状があるにもかかわらず、それぞれ5日間・8日間働き続け、139人に接客した。 しかし、美容師も客もマスクをしていたので、誰一人にも感染させなかった。 #マスク #マスクしろ https://t.co/PPuKJ0AkEm
@korngrower @govkristinoem There is clear science, and I don’t need to “ask Ireland.” https://t.co/CYiepIhb5N https://t.co/zymrlvEOOK https://t.co/sClLjyWmP8 https://t.co/SEojBx1nFg https://t.co/uLUuWC4ygc https://t.co/XVtxV55gWx https://t.co/0qlXxv
@Jenniferclarew @talkRADIO @JuliaHB1 @RishiSunak Let's look at this one: https://t.co/r6to0XiX4L The hairdressers were non-symptomatic. They didn't do a control without masks.
@pleasethink2020 @govkristinoem You just said the complete opposite. So if you’ve changed your mind, you can start by read these:
@SenseiMark2 @govkristinoem The virus is transmitted via droplets and aerosols, genius. The studies are clear.
@Gramaratzi @govkristinoem No—it’s clear.
@michaege @GovChrisSununu Sorry … I’m not going down a rabbit hole to prove science to a non-believer. I’m not in the mood for mental masturbation today. Good luck to you though! https://t.co/cSCWiA9Bi4
@maestro_rayo @AlfOnshuus (evidencia es débil) Eso Maestro, no es verdad 1. https://t.co/gyFxPFUlyE 2. Gran Escala https://t.co/WP9PVaYSOg 3. Pequeña Escala https://t.co/CUcVISjtZX 4. https://t.co/3rKG6MsU4c 5. Entonces los médicos no deberían usar t
@RICHHABITS More biophysics: no human sheds unencapsulated virus. SARS-COV-2 virion = 0.125 micron (only found in a lab). Respiratory aerosols are typically +1 micron in diameter. Not sure about animals. If infected & well are BOTH masked, efficacy ma
@Inmate120921 @govkristinoem No, the science does not say that. Fauci tried to prevent a run on masks when hospitals needed them. We know they work. Start reading below.
@tokenguy09 @govkristinoem Cool snippets from old studies. One nice thing about the pandemic is that it squeezed a decade’s worth of mask research into 10 months. And the results are unambiguous:
@timbo0042 @govkristinoem Sure. Take Vermont—roughly our size and rural, with a mask mandate, a tenth of the infections we have, and a tenth of the deaths we have. Also, the VAST majority of science on masks shows that they work. Start here:
@jencantalope @govkristinoem Well, we know that’s not true. You can start here:
@trishdaniele @govkristinoem Sure—you can start here:
@greentsunamii @govkristinoem Feel free to tell me which sources are illegitimate: https://t.co/CYiepIhb5N https://t.co/zymrlvEOOK https://t.co/sClLjyWmP8 https://t.co/SEojBx1nFg https://t.co/uLUuWC4ygc https://t.co/XVtxV55gWx https://t.co/0qlXxvHv
@laurenthehough I opened my own one chair salon through this and have a hepa filter snd enforce masks. There’s a CDC report on a salon in MS that’s reassuring. Find someone safe near you! https://t.co/J4fhrdWFCC
@beer_bro_ @JeremyLeeSF @TelaDrin @BasedBeaver @jsoniatmerchant @eyenevermind @pcrritesgood @RepJayapal Here’s one showing masks work. https://t.co/cBMsyx84Ib
@sallauretta @SpaghettiBadger @LOFCKai Hendrix MJ, Walde C, Findley K, Trotman R. Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists After Exposure at a Hair Salon with a Universal Face Covering Policy – MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(28)
RT @hotradero: Oleh CDC Amerika, kasus ini kemudian dijadikan acuan bahwa penggunaan masker efektif meredam risiko penularan dalam kegiatan…
@james_m_wilt ah yes, haircutting. The activity that has *checks notes* a golden opportunity case study proving it can be done safely. https://t.co/rAryQS0RJV
@bechillcomedian Yeah, I definitely get that - I get very anxious about spending time physically around people - but data does indicate that mask use, even in close proximity, lowers viral transmission significantly. From early in the pandemic: https://t.c
La discussion sur l'ouverture des métiers de contact fait régulièrement référence à une étude aux E-U qui montre que 2 coiffeurs infectés n'ont infectés aucun de leurs 140 client (tous portaient des masques) Est-elle transposable? Lisez-vous même @Bertra
@GLBouchez @BertrandHenne @RTBFinfo Voici l'étude à laquelle M. Bouchez fait référence: https://t.co/vbt7zpZre0 C'est une étude sérieuse mais sa transposabilité est limitée: La durée moyenne par client est de 15 min donc à la limite pour considérer un con
@GLBouchez @BertrandHenne @RTBFinfo 1) En science, on cite ses références. S'agit-il de ceci: https://t.co/yUrVMSHNjp ? Validation du port du masque, pas de la réouverture. 2) l'étude émet des réserves. 3) Depuis juillet 2020, des variantes plus contagieu
@Freesia3027 これ、2つ見つけました。よく読んでいませんが、参考になるでしょうか。 https://t.co/va0z3902FC https://t.co/nnwRhARMEA
RT @sebastien_janas: @GLBouchez Vous pouvez déjà citer cette étude du CDC qui montre que 2 coiffeurs positifs au coronavirus n'ont contamin…
@GLBouchez Vous pouvez déjà citer cette étude du CDC qui montre que 2 coiffeurs positifs au coronavirus n'ont contaminé personne grace au port du masque. https://t.co/xrO2SuEHrD
@AlexOuhadi @GLBouchez @francoisdesmet Il y a pourtant des études... https://t.co/1IuI47PeUF
@GLBouchez @francoisdesmet Rappelons tout de même qu'un des premiers articles scientifiques démontrant l'intérêt des masques dans un endroit clos a été réalisé chez des coiffeurs américains. https://t.co/J9qbwsdVd6
@takemitsuronin @AlexJamesFitz @mattyglesias There is plenty of evidence that masks work in a real world setting. You just didn’t bother to look. https://t.co/HNgdKQDmi5
RT @dnknghtmn: @wlmbux @JESUSlSKING Has it?! Now is that coming from you and the FB gammons or well respected scientists... https://t.co/a…
@Big_Chimp @ImCoolRYou @dcexaminer @CDCgov No, of course not. The people posting above are lying or idiots. Masks do not offer perfect protection, but they help a lot. source: https://t.co/Q7TMFUdI05 https://t.co/TF0kItIZCU
@GordoMonstruo__ No se de donde sacaron ese papel, pero el sitio oficial del CDC *si* recomienda usar mascaras. https://t.co/IJk0ms9042 https://t.co/nNYnzzNyIE
@MikePot72928127 @AlexBerenson @CBC If you doubt the veracity of the study's findings (https://t.co/csG1ScQYoP) I eagerly await your learned rebuttal in the peer-reviewed press.
@rayandherdog @NahasNewman So the science indicates masks work. It’s up to you to use the knowledge available to you. Please show me where masks are detrimental to fighting COVID. Same challenge issued for months, one has provided any data to that end.
@mindymaucelli @NatalieJHarp @RudyGiuliani @DNC Oh hun, you think wearing masks is about YOU? It’s about stopping a symptomatic transmission and protecting our elders and those that are more vulnerable. https://t.co/7COcgUhp7U https://t.co/Vz2MvSG6pQ htt
@BroadwayVincenz @TrumpTrumpsAll2 @OutlookPeterson @SharylAttkisson This was a cute one about hairdressers and the use of masks https://t.co/v4c6GNn04V
@KAG45Patriot What then is this? https://t.co/7E1SG2RtGE
@notjustamum @an_leavy @normanswan has mentioned this case study of two symptomatic COVID+ hairdressers who wore masks, and didn’t pass COVID to 100+ clients. https://t.co/292vxQB2AC
Though this was before CDC declared that COVID transmission is possible via aerosol. Link to article: https://t.co/YxEGbw0MsS
@AidanKiely2
@Wilms16212300 @itssm2014 @ottawahealth @VeraEtches https://t.co/rc6wHq0ifr there is an example.
Asia has been open with everyone with masks on. And there are studies on this, but what can I say when people want to fear monger? https://t.co/sMeNalvOBC
@MDKanin I hope you know how to read. https://t.co/sMeNalvOBC
@Apostate1123 @NotATweeter16 @jaketapper @adamcarolla @benshapiro 139 people should have been infected. I always think of this, if 2 people wear, your improving odds. I’m not scared, just following science. Open up, wear masks, and distance. Seems mathemat
Hair Salon Study: While this study could point to masks working, it is without any control group and is only able to show a correlation and not a cause/effect because there is no intervention. I'll also point out that both infected persons wore masks.
@Jimmy60326773 @ClimbnPrana @davenewworld_2 Just facts. Sorry you can't deal with them. https://t.co/KXHSnoQamA