Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists After Exposure at a Hair Salon with a Universal Face Covering Policy — Springfield, Missouri, May 2020

@JacksonBettenc1 @SimulationComm3 @boriquagato LInks: https://t.co/wbs1438NEA https://t.co/Vda0Q8ZXC9 https://t.co/6K2G4ahjL0 https://t.co/PTvFWDMYI0 https://t.co/8zeV6AAdNQ

@JAFOOFAJ @1chicklette @kmc1213 Oof, I can/can’t imagine. Masks are good, though, as a frontline of defense (obvs not the whole story). You’ve probably seen or heard of this study. (In my mind, you work at Nordstrom. 🙂 I’m not asking - just saying.) htt

@DGoing5 @MdFozzy @AJKayWriter The believers clearly didn’t read the non-RCT study. The finding was that none of the 139 clients “showed symptoms” not that they were negative for COVID. More than half the respondents refused to be even tested. But don’t ta

I am less concerned that I have become that person that notices on how a study was cited in (checks notes) The New York Times and sends my fact check, than that data from these studies that I read has taken up space in my brain and won’t leave. 🤦🏻‍♀️

@nytimes I actually found two errors in this story. 1. In the salon example, only 58 of the 139 clients agreed to be tested. 72 refused. It is a noted limitation of the results. Some may have caught, they just don’t know. (1/2) https://t.co/ZAJo6jl3gQ

@GinLessIsMore So frustrating But one caveat Just so you have the info regardless of what you decide https://t.co/ocYVsgKNZi

@GinLessIsMore Do what you are comfortable with......here is an article from the CDC that applies to this situation. I work in an office with masks and not able to socially distance. Everyone has to research and make the best decisions for themselves.

@JuliaHB1 Imbecile. https://t.co/3fgmPYQrP1

RT @Spoonhead8: "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both the stylists & the clients w…

RT @Spoonhead8: @DaleWil39870290 @JuliaHB1 That's from May. The below is from September. Science moves forward. https://t.co/UQbi5TlhXG

@TheEllebach https://t.co/ajywSfkYgH https://t.co/SVDuqMibMo

@DaleWil39870290 @JuliaHB1 That's from May. The below is from September. Science moves forward. https://t.co/UQbi5TlhXG

Proof that masks work and businesses did NOT have to close when masks are mandatory....https://t.co/flKoy7Wwle

@kashmirismine @catlady111310 @OwnedByCats1973 @ChuckyReforged @DogsBCool @AdrenochromeD @Mongo3804 @Doku_HL_SD @Black_is_back5 @CarlyCalifello @LisaNicholo @shrekthepunk @simon_r_katz @Brion_TV @boodacat2020 @RhondaT79833457 @Vickie627 @N3ILA_ @WorkerBee4

@RealCDurks @Thinkingmom19 @roccogalatilaw to the studies of the NIH and CDC. "Consistent and correct use of face coverings, when appropriate, is an important tool for minimizing spread of SARS-CoV-2 from presymptomatic, asymptomatic, and symptomatic perso

RT @Spoonhead8: @Jan24827157 @padfootcare @Saffiya_Khan1 "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-1…

RT @Spoonhead8: @Jan24827157 @padfootcare @Saffiya_Khan1 "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-1…

@Jan24827157 @padfootcare @Saffiya_Khan1 "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both the stylists & the clients wore face masks, no symptomatic secondary cases were reported; among 67 clients tested fo

@LissaKay @tanantunarit @ginacarano lol https://t.co/FkLHCzRZf4 https://t.co/M9ZstFBFOK https://t.co/veshWbeTbh https://t.co/G8sSy8s2no https://t.co/5fWKrUU29W

@amandamull @kathbarbadoro yep: https://t.co/0cnDOhOGr8

Science...

@DrKimSue Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov

Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov

Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov

Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov

@nypost Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov

@j0ssef2 Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov

Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov

@RiderBabe52 Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov

@mikewasson There was this: https://t.co/P7CdXcw4vC

Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov

@kevin_willetts @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Maybe he read this: Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov

@BOYCOTT_ELITE @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov

@lokimickeysull1 @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov

@Stevie_Nip @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov

@RayB03892178 @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov

@Damnyankee_la @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Did you know better and know about this? Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov

Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov

@rottenchester @NYGovCuomo @melissadderosa Yes, I watched too. They clearly had not been following the news here and were unprepared for this obvious question. We know masks work in salons - and NY has strict protocols. https://t.co/KcLoUo6yf4

@Chris_Chapman61 @ScottishJenbel @cushyglen @thehistoryguy Hi, what is going to be an acceptable source for you? https://t.co/Yu2aEU2uja

@NickReisman https://t.co/yg8Aa8wdlj

@blynxz @WicMar @AgnesWold @Thomas_Westin1 https://t.co/Kc10Vg9WUG

@highfries @TheFlatEartherr @Nerdy_Marc @FullFact "Among 139 clients exposed to 2 symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both stylists & the clients wore face masks, no symptomatic secondary cases were reported; among 67 clients tested

@rroliver360 @ErnieWales @jkenney @CMOH_Alberta @shandro https://t.co/MDKqd9BIUZ

RT @DrGomi: @crouzet @DBlameble @LehmannDrC @DidierPittet @BAG_OFSP_UFSP @alain_berset ni celui ci , qui est intéressant : est ce que les c…

@Mindy47245934 @workinprog78 @JeffreyGuterman @realDonaldTrump @gregkellyusa @newsmax Here are just a few, take your pick: https://t.co/c4yvFORNgF https://t.co/S6QGVT3qgF https://t.co/DPWQsGvX2Z https://t.co/imSfZY2hlK https://t.co/ISoO33qcgw https://t.co/

Recuerda siempre las 3 M cuando estés en un entorno comunitario https://t.co/UwTIzTiPrV

@jhaskinscabrera And then you have the anecdotal hairdresser saloon story, ehm , study https://t.co/ie1munZCFu

RT @DrGomi: @crouzet @DBlameble @LehmannDrC @DidierPittet @BAG_OFSP_UFSP @alain_berset ni celui ci , qui est intéressant : est ce que les c…

@crouzet @DBlameble @LehmannDrC @DidierPittet @BAG_OFSP_UFSP @alain_berset ni celui ci , qui est intéressant : est ce que les clients ont eu des contacts infectants potentiels , et pourquoi personne n a été conatminé ? https://t.co/iBO1fPkJdI

@GoingMedieval @hoaxeye Now at £27k. I don't see how this is about disinformation. Seems more like defiance to me. How good is the information that her operation of the salon is dangerous enough to warrant the fines? https://t.co/NFrF3cd6xX

@JudgeClayJ “Asymptomatic carriers don’t spread infection.” https://t.co/gmiqikOTVK “Exposure doesn’t mean death; doesn’t even mean illness.” https://t.co/WI4wo8esR1

The experience reminded me of this study of two Georgia hairdressers who were COVID+ and did not infect any of their clients. They wore masks. https://t.co/kKKIzh4EZz

@pucksglen @asymmetricinfo Here’s one helpful analysis tending prove the efficacy of masks in reducing the virus in exhaled respiration. https://t.co/XKFq5oFteH

RT @LupenciaB: Esto es lo más estúpid0 que leí. Si UN (UNO) caso fuera suficiente para probar algo, entonces yo q estuve con un contagiado…

@beckystlouis I’m sorry. That’s got to make you very anxious, but maybe you can take comfort in this well-documented case where everyone wore masks and there were no transmissions: https://t.co/j4FhVouJsH

To back up my assertions: https://t.co/R1HvcAme0h https://t.co/SrbFOGokbq https://t.co/5W2u4AKeIs https://t.co/eYS1dUvTee

@russnelson @PerBylund If there's no good evidence that they work, just not in the way you understand, please explain all of this: https://t.co/WOqOLH09ru https://t.co/9X0HmXn9Pp https://t.co/pZYK1tNohJ https://t.co/5i8wzu3SdF

@JeBroo5 @LAURENCEJAMS It’s an anecdote from the Spring that got wide publicity. https://t.co/US3mVPLyaH

@PerBylund @russnelson https://t.co/9X0HmXn9Pp https://t.co/5i8wzu3SdF https://t.co/pZYK1tNohJ Meanwhile this started with your post about a Danish study that was so flawed no medical paper would print it with a faulty premise.

@Sappientissimu1 Same study with more detail. Control population provided...coworkers and family members around same people without masks. https://t.co/hSlfTntB0q

@VilYampier Lee este estudio publicado por el CDC. Dos estilistas que trabajaron enfermad y sintomáticas pero con mascarillas al igual que las clientas y no contagiaron a nadie. https://t.co/e6O7bUZWyH

@Birdyword The problem is, it's trying to quantify a negative - how many people didn't get sick due to wearing masks. BUT there was a natural experiment on this topic, and the answer was: 100%. Alas in US people won't do anything to protect others, just th

@R_Good_Fellow @latimes Thanks for providing the data. 1. Can you please provide the source of all the data you have posted? 2. Please look at this story from two people form Missouri https://t.co/1S32DZUwo0

@TaraRoss @MarkWyl49983921 @DrTomFrieden https://t.co/eSwFteW8Tc

RT @stdennard: Here are just a few peer reviewed articles + meta analyses on the efficacy of mask use: https://t.co/FHmvcmrP2E https://t.…

@jeffreyatucker, maybe you've already seen this. I find the title hilarious: "The Science behind Masks". But read the "CDC study" linked on that page: https://t.co/7Z4qRaYE3X ...it's even more funny. https://t.co/WB9Kz8NHR0

@aalon @ween191 @Lasthedge @latimes Have you seen this science? https://t.co/yS1oYXEXc5 https://t.co/l51C3pSErZ https://t.co/wSCvQ4KoQh https://t.co/RFfUQuODNY https://t.co/yW3w102BrX https://t.co/7E8k0RcSTi https://t.co/5VbazvRkPE

@aalon @PlumProfessora @ChrysalidesArt @ColleenHuberNMD "Consistent and correct use of face coverings, when appropriate, is an important tool for minimizing spread of SARS-CoV-2 from presymptomatic, asymptomatic, and symptomatic persons." https://t.co/yW3w

@PlumProfessora @mariabronn75 @cplshelly @Max_Gorden "Consistent and correct use of face coverings, when appropriate, is an important tool for minimizing spread of SARS-CoV-2 from presymptomatic, asymptomatic, and symptomatic persons." https://t.co/yW3w102

RT @stdennard: Here are just a few peer reviewed articles + meta analyses on the efficacy of mask use: https://t.co/FHmvcmrP2E https://t.…

Pray you never cross Susan Dennard.

RT @stdennard: Here are just a few peer reviewed articles + meta analyses on the efficacy of mask use: https://t.co/FHmvcmrP2E https://t.…

#WearAMask

RT @stdennard: Here are just a few peer reviewed articles + meta analyses on the efficacy of mask use: https://t.co/FHmvcmrP2E https://t.…

@MaartenvSmeden @NoahHaber Two hairstylists were symptomatic and COVID positive saw around ~130 clients, BOTH stylists and clients wore masks. Following up after encounter; No reported secondary symptomatic cases, among the 67 clients tested all were negat

RT @Spoonhead8: "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both the stylists & the clients w…

RT @Spoonhead8: "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both the stylists & the clients w…

RT @Spoonhead8: "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both the stylists & the clients w…

RT @Spoonhead8: "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both the stylists & the clients w…

RT @Prof_Lowe: 8/ Utility of masks: 2 ill hair stylists interacted with 139 clients, none of the 67 clients interviewed developed infection…

"Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both the stylists & the clients wore face masks, no symptomatic secondary cases were reported; among 67 clients tested for SARS-CoV-2, all test results were negat

RT @stdennard: Here are just a few peer reviewed articles + meta analyses on the efficacy of mask use: https://t.co/FHmvcmrP2E https://t.…

RT @TheMindfulMoxie: PLEASE READ THE WHOLE THREAD

RT @TheMindfulMoxie: PLEASE READ THE WHOLE THREAD

PLEASE READ THE WHOLE THREAD

RT @stdennard: Here are just a few peer reviewed articles + meta analyses on the efficacy of mask use: https://t.co/FHmvcmrP2E https://t.…

RT @stdennard: Here are just a few peer reviewed articles + meta analyses on the efficacy of mask use: https://t.co/FHmvcmrP2E https://t.…

Here are just a few peer reviewed articles + meta analyses on the efficacy of mask use: https://t.co/FHmvcmrP2E https://t.co/cRYyCXj6qz https://t.co/6yEUmjkswZ https://t.co/kUrpDCaSRz https://t.co/3Xjzt47Xxj https://t.co/oZYI5TvfCJ

Ахуєнний експеримент🤦

@brad_studio @BrianPallister @roussin_brent and clients..." https://t.co/yW3w0ZL0Ap Don't take my word for it. Examine the peer-reviewed research literature published by established medical organizations for yourself. https://t.co/T51h7v05Gk https://t.co/

@michellericail1 @ColleenHuberNMD "Consistent and correct use of face coverings, when appropriate, is an important tool for minimizing spread of SARS-CoV-2 from presymptomatic, asymptomatic, and symptomatic persons." https://t.co/yW3w0ZL0Ap 4/?

RT @Prof_Lowe: 8/ Utility of masks: 2 ill hair stylists interacted with 139 clients, none of the 67 clients interviewed developed infection…

RT @Prof_Lowe: 8/ Utility of masks: 2 ill hair stylists interacted with 139 clients, none of the 67 clients interviewed developed infection…

@TheHookham https://t.co/NzqGDUcxIA https://t.co/kkgN0QmGAY https://t.co/rz41Rx6n30 https://t.co/RQeIsUZg4M https://t.co/keFtsJFQqX And you can read through a whole host of other writings here: https://t.co/GT2m64Iveu

RT @Prof_Lowe: 8/ Utility of masks: 2 ill hair stylists interacted with 139 clients, none of the 67 clients interviewed developed infection…

@daibyday Honestly this makes no sense. Salons if everyone is wearing a mask have shown specifically *not* to transmit infection. https://t.co/cn01sdT2sm

RT @Prof_Lowe: 8/ Utility of masks: 2 ill hair stylists interacted with 139 clients, none of the 67 clients interviewed developed infection…

@Maximilz66 @Darlene13866342 @JHonebrink @ColleenHuberNMD "Consistent and correct use of face coverings, when appropriate, is an important tool for minimizing spread of SARS-CoV-2 from presymptomatic, asymptomatic, and symptomatic persons." https://t.co/yW

@thisandthatmkay @pamelasm @MichelleSteelCA @MikeEmanuelFox Not true at all. Would love to see the kooky studies you refer to https://t.co/Ad2OylXppR