↓ Skip to main content

Biological Networks and Pathway Analysis

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Biological Networks and Pathway Analysis'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 A Practical Guide to Quantitative Interactor Screening with Next-Generation Sequencing (QIS-Seq)
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 sbv IMPROVER: Modern Approach to Systems Biology
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Mathematical Justification of Expression-Based Pathway Activation Scoring (PAS)
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Bioinformatics Meets Biomedicine: OncoFinder, a Quantitative Approach for Interrogating Molecular Pathways Using Gene Expression Data
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Strategic Integration of Multiple Bioinformatics Resources for System Level Analysis of Biological Networks
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Functional Analysis of OMICs Data and Small Molecule Compounds in an Integrated “Knowledge-Based” Platform
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Extracting the Strongest Signals from Omics Data: Differentially Expressed Pathways and Beyond
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Search for Master Regulators in Walking Cancer Pathways
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Mathematical Modeling of Avidity Distribution and Estimating General Binding Properties of Transcription Factors from Genome-Wide Binding Profiles
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 A Weighted SNP Correlation Network Method for Estimating Polygenic Risk Scores
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Analysis of cis-Regulatory Elements in Gene Co-expression Networks in Cancer
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Rule Mining Techniques to Predict Prokaryotic Metabolic Pathways
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 ArrayTrack: An FDA and Public Genomic Tool
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Identification of Transcriptional Regulators of Psoriasis from RNA-Seq Experiments
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Comprehensive Analyses of Tissue-Specific Networks with Implications to Psychiatric Diseases
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Semantic Data Integration and Knowledge Management to Represent Biological Network Associations
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Knowledge-Based Compact Disease Models: A Rapid Path from High-Throughput Data to Understanding Causative Mechanisms for a Complex Disease
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Pharmacologic Manipulation of Wnt Signaling and Cancer Stem Cells
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Functional Network Disruptions in Schizophrenia
Attention for Chapter 17: Knowledge-Based Compact Disease Models: A Rapid Path from High-Throughput Data to Understanding Causative Mechanisms for a Complex Disease
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Chapter title
Knowledge-Based Compact Disease Models: A Rapid Path from High-Throughput Data to Understanding Causative Mechanisms for a Complex Disease
Chapter number 17
Book title
Biological Networks and Pathway Analysis
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7027-8_17
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7025-4, 978-1-4939-7027-8
Authors

Anatoly Mayburd, Ancha Baranova

Abstract

High-throughput profiling of human tissues typically yields the gene lists composed of a variety of more or less relevant molecular entities. These lists are riddle by false positive observations that often obstruct generation of mechanistic hypothesis that may explain complex phenotype. From general probabilistic considerations, the gene lists enriched by the mechanistically relevant targets can be far more useful for subsequent experimental design or data interpretation. Using Alzheimer's disease as example, the candidate gene lists were processed into different tiers of evidence consistency established by enrichment analysis across subdatasets collected within the same experiment and across different experiments and platforms. The cutoffs were established empirically through ontological and semantic enrichment; resultant shortened gene list was reexpanded by Ingenuity Pathway Assistant tool. The resulting subnetworks provided the basis for generating mechanistic hypotheses that were partially validated by mined experimental evidence. This approach differs from previous consistency-based studies in that the cutoff on the Receiver Operating Characteristic of the true-false separation process is optimized by flexible selection of the consistency building procedure. The resultant Compact Disease Models (CDM) composed of the gene list distilled by this analytic technique and its network-based representation allowed us to highlight possible role of the protein traffic vesicles in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's. Considering the distances and complexity of protein trafficking in neurons, it is plausible to hypothesize that spontaneous protein misfolding along with a shortage of growth stimulation may provide a shortcut to neurodegeneration. Several potentially overlapping scenarios of early-stage Alzheimer pathogenesis are discussed, with an emphasis on the protective effects of Angiotensin receptor 1 (AT-1) mediated antihypertensive response on cytoskeleton remodeling, along with neuronal activation of oncogenes, luteinizing hormone signaling and insulin-related growth regulation, forming a pleiotropic model of its early stages. Compact Disease Model generation is a flexible approach for high-throughput data analysis that allows extraction of meaningful, mechanism-centered gene sets compatible with instant translation of the results into testable hypotheses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Neuroscience 2 12%
Mathematics 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,477,045
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,381
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,297
of 421,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#468
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.