RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hospital (sem levarem conta no denominador todos os demais casos de COVID leve, sem miocardite em adultos jovens ). 1/2
RT @alexandrosM: Well, without exception, they tend to look at hospitalized patients, who are already at worse health than the general popu…
RT @alexandrosM: Well, without exception, they tend to look at hospitalized patients, who are already at worse health than the general popu…
Well, without exception, they tend to look at hospitalized patients, who are already at worse health than the general population, and compare them with vaccinated patients, who are not at worse health. Apples and oranges. https://t.co/BOUmO7ijHP
Hmm. Seems they tied a noose around their own necks while trying to tie it around ours. Yes I’m an anti vaxer. No I don’t feel bad that I listened to my instinct and common sense. https://t.co/wz6nvlbwgy https://t.co/H9z1Nv7W8Z
@realstewpeters https://t.co/H9z1Nv7W8Z Think they slipped the noose around their own necks while trying to slip it around ours. https://t.co/QZ73ZKoeHa
RT @InWuchang: That CDC study uses the wrong denominator. It should be everyone infected with covid. Instead, the CDC study admits, "SARS-C…
RT @InWuchang: That CDC study uses the wrong denominator. It should be everyone infected with covid. Instead, the CDC study admits, "SARS-C…
RT @InWuchang: Let's start with what Guo et al use as the myocarditis risk after covid infection: between 1 in 2,800 and 1 in 4,049. The a…
That CDC study uses the wrong denominator. It should be everyone infected with covid. Instead, the CDC study admits, "SARS-CoV-2 infections were not captured if testing occurred in homes, schools, community sites, or pharmacies." https://t.co/0zFBeJh0Ch
Let's start with what Guo et al use as the myocarditis risk after covid infection: between 1 in 2,800 and 1 in 4,049. The authors cite a single CDC study: https://t.co/0zFBeJh0Ch https://t.co/JxycA6sLJl
@VaccaRules 5. The myocarditis rate Guo et al use for covid infection is worthless. The CDC study Guo cites: "SARS-CoV-2 infections were not captured if testing occurred in homes, schools, community sites, or pharmacies." Phony denominator = worthless ris
@MikeyScottC4 @CutTheStringss @theBoombaata @carolinecwilder @harryjsisson That was cherry picked. Myocarditis did occur, but it’s not clear if it was related to previous infection. Those who had previously been infected , were more at risk. It’s known for
RT @KelleyKga: @nycexpatmom @TracyBethHoeg @VPrasadMDMPH @davidzweig This is the flawed MMWR they used for the rate of myocarditis post-Cov…
Most egregious is borrowing from a horrible CDC MMWR, unironically released on April Fools Day, 2022, to "set" their post-covid myocarditis rates: https://t.co/kJodFuAxEP They looked for young men hospitalized w/ myocarditis and checked for prior covid inf
@tylerblack32 There is no reason to believe covid infection ever causes myocarditis in unvaccinated people. large studies have found it doesn't: https://t.co/GhKk3jWRPi the above meta-study cites https://t.co/q3aHvRX0nZ as the source for its estimate of t
RT @KelleyKga: @nycexpatmom @TracyBethHoeg @VPrasadMDMPH @davidzweig This is the flawed MMWR they used for the rate of myocarditis post-Cov…
@MauraBo14841287 @ChrisTigani @PeterHotez @newrepublic @joerogan I have read up. Excuse me, but is it OK if I believe the CDC instead of something called discern report? https://t.co/BJylwR3Zsu
@jeanbarbeau2 Il semble y avoir malgré tout un sérieux défaut à cette étude parce que le dénominateur pour les myo post covid est restreint aux enfants ayant consulté un médecin suite à leur covid, un pourcentage minuscule du total des infections. https:/
RT @KelleyKga: @nycexpatmom @TracyBethHoeg @VPrasadMDMPH @davidzweig This is the flawed MMWR they used for the rate of myocarditis post-Cov…
@walidgellad Agree. Not sure why CDC doesn't mention EHR in the study title. https://t.co/RHyl5jz0Kq
@DrSuneelDhand @DrSuneelDhand The risk for cardiac outcomes was likewise significantly higher after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after first, second, or unspecified dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination for all other groups by sex and age https://t.co/PwzjSOxk3g
RT @KelleyKga: @nycexpatmom @TracyBethHoeg @VPrasadMDMPH @davidzweig This is the flawed MMWR they used for the rate of myocarditis post-Cov…
RT @KelleyKga: @nycexpatmom @TracyBethHoeg @VPrasadMDMPH @davidzweig This is the flawed MMWR they used for the rate of myocarditis post-Cov…
@BMFPerspective @rahmdphd @PeterHotez Forgot source: https://t.co/cgndbizoB2
@FreeMemes4Peace @EconomicPrison1 @jayvanbavel You mean this study with 15.3 million subjects? I think you don’t know what garbage is, and if you wanted to dismiss it you should find studies that show a different rate of Covid infection associated myocardi
@crackedp0t @celinegounder Oh I guess that settles it then... It can't have critical errors because it's on a fancy pyramid... Dipshit. https://t.co/vmtIuBQ9LE
RT @KelleyKga: @nycexpatmom @TracyBethHoeg @VPrasadMDMPH @davidzweig This is the flawed MMWR they used for the rate of myocarditis post-Cov…
RT @KelleyKga: @nycexpatmom @TracyBethHoeg @VPrasadMDMPH @davidzweig This is the flawed MMWR they used for the rate of myocarditis post-Cov…
RT @KelleyKga: @nycexpatmom @TracyBethHoeg @VPrasadMDMPH @davidzweig This is the flawed MMWR they used for the rate of myocarditis post-Cov…
They first use the flawed MMWR paper that we have talked about before as their baseline. This paper only looked at those cases that were documented in the medical record. Any mild case that was seen outpatient, etc, was excluded. https://t.co/hSsspUrYs2
@Mikeak01 @JerseyTaylorHam @celinegounder Based on what now? https://t.co/Zd51FokPMe
@celinegounder The Guo study only analyzed post vaccine myocarditis, but it did mention the (unfortunately dated) 1 APR 2022 CDC report that post infection myocarditis is higher than post vaccine https://t.co/mX1CTQrDVF Both reassure vaccine safety.
@nycexpatmom @TracyBethHoeg @VPrasadMDMPH @davidzweig This is the flawed MMWR they used for the rate of myocarditis post-Covid. It only looked at people whose infections were documented in medical records - so it leaves out all the mild Covid cases in youn
@MaryHun04490938 @AvonandsomerRob @DrAseemMalhotra Look at this gigantic cover up! CDC has the data about heart complications from vaccine on its website 😂😂😂. https://t.co/RSCyP199gb there is nothing being ignored. You guys will take anything as evidence.
@AvonandsomerRob @DrAseemMalhotra There are other studies that also back it up. That include omicron time periods. https://t.co/RSCyP19H5J
@CentristAllWay @BallouxFrancois I have, by the way... https://t.co/sFVLiY2c63 https://t.co/HnD5ZNoIhi https://t.co/nZ0SeMsKK4 https://t.co/ztuEnKbW7Z Etc etc
@Gabwbw181237 @felipec @degenbtw @hutchinson In the graph, it specifically says “compared to after 2nd vaccine”, so no, the second shot does not outweigh the risk of being unvaccinated. It’s right in the graph. https://t.co/P0u9xA2yaW
@highheelz807 There is not one drug or vaccine that is free of side effects. The fact is, studies show that a low percentage of young men are more inclined to myocarditis after a vaccine, but the benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks. https://t.co/BDn
@Toukoretrotaku @SangD_Encre @Cest__Rond @Ken__kaneki33 Commence par le lire 😏😏😏 https://t.co/pRbkCiA0lm
They’re still using cdc as a source. Can you IMAGINE how low your iq has to be to do that?
@JimSatone @joerogan Where's your proof, nasty? This is the latest study provided by the CDC that compares myocarditis risk after vaccination and COVID infection. https://t.co/00f2bDmQ0x https://t.co/DS1eCECTMI
@Toukoretrotaku @SangD_Encre @Cest__Rond @Ken__kaneki33 En attendant voici un autre rapport du CDC qui démontre que le risque de myocardite est plus élevé chez les non vax 😏 https://t.co/pRbkCiA0lm
RT @austinrobu: @felipec @hutchinson https://t.co/re7DuPpKYc The CDC seems to disagree with you here
@felipec @hutchinson https://t.co/re7DuPpKYc The CDC seems to disagree with you here
@PeterHotez @annamerlan You mean like the CDC admitting that it knew about the myocarditis it causes? https://t.co/mp11cBTQ7c
April 8, 2022 Cardiac Complications After SARS-CoV-2 Infection and mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination https://t.co/nlkwoa5bsA
1 تحقیق مقایسهای که CDC در ارتباط با خطر ابتلا به مشکلات قلبی بعد از ابتلا به ویروس کرونا و پیشگیری از ابتلا به دلیل واکسیناسیون انجام داده؛ نشون میده که ابتلا به ویروس کرونا،احتمال ابتلا به مشکلات قلبی رو بیشتر میکنه( مخصوصا سویه اُمیکرون). https://t.c
@_____Greg______ @MissVan34184871 @fishinthisweek @BadVaccineTakes Sorry I thought I was sending this: “The incidence of myocarditis found for young men after SARS-CoV-2 infection is larger than what we found for myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination
Source: https://t.co/pRbkCiA0lm
@riverlight55 @Carmilla5 Is it this one you mean? https://t.co/AUtyfPn4i1
@LiebenbergCarl For in case you missed it.. https://t.co/1gevARpoix
@freedom14456 @SIMONCU46424244 @EgnerCarl @IanCopeland5 Link for previous tweet: https://t.co/Vdva9dCjsz (2022-04-08)
@freedom14456 @SIMONCU46424244 @EgnerCarl @IanCopeland5 This CDC study uses data from 40 healthcare systems to estimate the risk of myocarditis by gender and age. The tables provide the incidence rate per 100,000 persons for myocarditis following vaccinati
@CiaoBella444 In their studies they also say that the risk of this happening is higher with people who actually get the disease, COVID19. It's on their website. https://t.co/3gLMO07ckP https://t.co/Ks98r40Ya0
@robert900r @Jarek62460098 Pana Ladapo fakt manipulował. Proszę pamiętać że C19 powoduje nie tylko takie powikłania. Oby z roku na rok ich nie przybywało. Na razie wygląda to niepokojąco. Ad bańki. Rozumienie czym jest konflikt interesów raczkuje w Polsce
@handmadekathy @snowbird1942 @stkirsch Here's your trusted medical science authorities officially confirming increased cardiac risk associated with the vaccine. https://t.co/a90UNR2ofk
RT @JbarGarden: @pwleaks The risk of cardiac complications are higher when you DON’T have the vaccine. https://t.co/Lr6xRNDwtM https://t.co…
@pwleaks The risk of cardiac complications are higher when you DON’T have the vaccine. https://t.co/Lr6xRNDwtM https://t.co/2187aaT126
Beklenenden daha yüksek miyokardit oluşumuna rağmen, mRNA COVID-19 aşılarının faydalarının miyokardit riskinden daha ağır bastığı gösterilmiştir referanslarda. https://t.co/j3h1xsTCDl https://t.co/9XFSuvagxF Ki bu çok önemli. Tıpta fayda/zarar dengesi çok
@raqueltobes In some cases it does, and in other cases it alleviates the severity of disease and, hence, the likelihood of heart conditions. The risk of heart conditions is higher from COVID-19 than from the vaccine. 1/3 https://t.co/Ess93Wnj5J
@HelloImage80 @TheFreds Regardless of the miniscule issues of myocarditis with Pfizer, COVID is much worse. https://t.co/Pbq7JhdUVm
@TinaW94556171 @karlmj2 @patwebbjr https://t.co/7jSQHimPra https://t.co/9NwXwwAgB8 from covid infections? yeah I agree
RT @VirusesImmunity: @All__Incomplete @SciImmunology @AnisBarmada @YaleIBIO @lucasite_lab @InciYildirim11 @YalePediatrics According to the…
RT @VirusesImmunity: @All__Incomplete @SciImmunology @AnisBarmada @YaleIBIO @lucasite_lab @InciYildirim11 @YalePediatrics According to the…
RT @VirusesImmunity: @All__Incomplete @SciImmunology @AnisBarmada @YaleIBIO @lucasite_lab @InciYildirim11 @YalePediatrics According to the…