@KennyGr61411855 @RjbRocklin @stkirsch https://t.co/zG2ZNy7ULf CDC study used to say myocarditis was much worse after covid. Should be using seroprevalence to estimate covid cases. Instead uses confirmed hospital cases. Doesn’t include tests from pharmaci
@havoula @Streitschuster Es ist auch erwiesen, dass eine Corona-Infektion, auch bei jungen Leuten, häufiger als die Impfung Herzmuskelentzündungen auslöst, die in der Regel schwerer verlaufen als nach der Impfung. Z.B. https://t.co/z5Uzmqr3mt
@P_McCulloughMD @PolitiFact @instagram Fact-checkers and facts are so darn inconvenient when they overturn your narrative. https://t.co/bNHEb4K3sk
@MaryKRe That risk you presenting is lower than the risk from an infection. Here's also CDC (same source as you) on that front. https://t.co/AUtyfPn4i1
@minamiyoro @KEIZOmini3298 @rnHZo8uwzbvtqH5 @Varazslotanonc @ZlZabcAmcfTRtCF @15sWU2qQzCyiui4 @Kinako_Passo @maiti_86 @PDTH3ahqRCrVri7 @Kuroi_Yahu ちょっと計算してみました。新型コロナワクチン接種者100万人に対しての心筋炎のリスクですが文献によってブレがありますが100万人あたり800~1500件といったところです。 https://t.co/IEwnhNZP
RT @astynis: @admilfer @WayneBruce4744 @Ryo_Masahiko @Alexa2B74 @fluidloading @LangMickael2 @ordre_medecins Le plus risible c'est que le ri…
RT @astynis: @admilfer @WayneBruce4744 @Ryo_Masahiko @Alexa2B74 @fluidloading @LangMickael2 @ordre_medecins Le plus risible c'est que le ri…
RT @astynis: @admilfer @WayneBruce4744 @Ryo_Masahiko @Alexa2B74 @fluidloading @LangMickael2 @ordre_medecins Le plus risible c'est que le ri…
@admilfer @WayneBruce4744 @Ryo_Masahiko @Alexa2B74 @fluidloading @LangMickael2 @ordre_medecins Le plus risible c'est que le risque de myocardite est jusqu'à 8x plus élevé pour un non vaccinés 😅 https://t.co/pRbkCiA0lm
@robbystarbuck You mean investigations like these… https://t.co/WrcuR5Q66r
@LBonneux @KlaasvanDijk5 @MMC @IBonnx @IGJnl @matthijsgdj @MichielVermeul6 @harmknot @ED_Regio Het ging hier niet om beleid, maar om de relatieve risico's op myocarditis t.g.v. respectievelijk vaccinatie ne van infectie. Dit is de bron van de infographic d
@FrKast @mkeulemans @HansV_16 @Alicia1984N @vanranstmarc @statistiekcbs Staat in afbeelding die @mkeulemans plaatste, zie: https://t.co/XxseR6oAdr
@2VTZtcuH7Lzb5oi @aiueokaki119 @ujPoY5saaK4bJVY これが厚労省発表の元ネタのCDC資料です。 「感染の方がワクチン由来より優位に高い」とあります。 注意すべき点はこのデータは昨年1月までの累計、つまりオミクロン前の米国のデータと言う点。 → https://t.co/OXp3AnV1wE
@IsabellaMDeLuca 1) you didn't site the source of your study so this is basically " I heard this so trust me it's true. 2) it's a known thing here is the CDC back in 2022... https://t.co/wblVP1oExy
@DuvaleroyJ @LehmannDrC La balance bénéfice-risque a été prise en considération. La honte est plutôt chez ceux qui ont défendu l'infection de masse et par conséquent l'eugénisme. Le risque cardiaque est bien plus important post viral que post vaccinal. Blâ
@Destiny_Chiild @Saikmedi @KleinsaJennifer @eekymom This is the CDC-sponsored study people will cite to say that COVID causes more heart complications than vaccines. https://t.co/0yNZhl6y8O
@olivesbts @fluidloading @Enogia_13 Oups "l'immunité naturelle plus sûre et efficace" ... ah bah non 🤣🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/pRbkCiA0lm
@Jo_Bond @P_McCulloughMD @stinchfield1776 @RealAmVoice Which minute were all of you born? There's one born every minute. https://t.co/EvItN6oE5p
@Jo_Bond @P_McCulloughMD @stinchfield1776 @RealAmVoice Here is the actual study that quack is referencing. Can any of you fucks read? Data found that the risk for cardiac complications was significantly higher after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after va
@DebWilhelm69 @JeromeAdamsMD @coffeefreak4eva The Yale study references misleading CDC data which is comparing people who interacted with the medical system after covid to people who got vaccines. Most young males do not go to the hospital or doctor for co
@oxford_92 @dalhem_s @clhebdo5 @AmarLouis @ouestmoncycle Pas de commentaires? https://t.co/AvgIFEcWZ2
@RareImagery @wildcardschoon @krassenstein “incidences of cardiac complications after SARS-CoV-2 infection or mRNA COVID-19 vaccination were low overall but were higher after infection than after vaccination for both males and females in all age groups.”
@IArtimez @dinamo1234 @alfwarrior @bcapillas Este con el foco en COVID, indica que el riesgo es mayor (1.8-5.6 veces) en infectados SARScov2 que en vacunados. https://t.co/vvHVpbF4D0 Este estudio, mas general, es de 2023, indica que el rango anual se mant
Be mindful ( of good & bad conditions- concerns ) of the complications/ symptoms/side effects & lasted innovationive uses of the vaccine components- etc / Such as MRNA updates —-👇🏽✌🏽🤳🏾👂 Cardiac complications- , plus more 👀🤦 https://t.co/WALPEO7LRQ
@RealDanowitz @RTLnieuws En in het verlengde daarvan ook nog eens dezelfde conclusies zodra je het per leeftijdsgroep bekijkt of per gender.
@NakamotoBr97335 Here’s a study that came to a similar conclusion but breaks it down by age groups and genders. https://t.co/Of7suZ5s5W I’ve also provided a chart from Australia showing a similar outcome. The data is overwhelming if you look for it htt
@PeaceTrain369 The first question is canopy replicated by other groups of scientists. I have linked a separate study below which has completely different funding and different authors but which came to the same conclusion, and broke it down by age group, a
@hfortiermtl Here’s a study that comes to a similar conclusion, but breaks it down by age group and gender. https://t.co/Of7suZ5s5W https://t.co/SPs0qHBFjf
@MaryKRe Oh, you wanted it broken down by age and sex. Not a problem. Here’s a study coming to the same conclusion but this one breaks it down by sex and age. https://t.co/Of7suZ5s5W And we both know that just because it’s a year old doesn’t make it outd
@BroccoliStrong Again, you’re welcome to be unvaccinated. I have no problem with that nor should I. By the way, here’s a follow up study to the one I posted that has the same conclusion but also breaks down by age group and by gender. https://t.co/Of7s
@NotAHoax Great question and I’ll probably do a follow up post on this early next week. Here is a study that found similar results to the one I posted above, but this one does break down each age group as well. https://t.co/Of7suZ5s5W “Even among male
@AnneMaine3 @stoic5132 @Yash25571056 Untrue…read (& understand the studies). There is clearly more incidence of cardiac issues from the virus than from the vaccine. Here is one among many studies: https://t.co/ZH79mcCKZ6
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Also this @CDCMMWR "study" she cites completely glosses over the fact the rate of myocarditis they found post dose 2 Pf…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Here's the piece of propaganda she's citing They take an unrepresentative sample of covid+ people w/diagnoses in the US…
@LowCard_Hunger @vancemurphy But it’s worse if you get the virus. https://t.co/Zas68C13DA
@Put201V @vancemurphy Your post is misleading. Read this, the virus has greater impact on the heart than the vaccine. https://t.co/Zas68C13DA
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Also this @CDCMMWR "study" she cites completely glosses over the fact the rate of myocarditis they found post dose 2 Pf…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Here's the piece of propaganda she's citing They take an unrepresentative sample of covid+ people w/diagnoses in the US…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Also this @CDCMMWR "study" she cites completely glosses over the fact the rate of myocarditis they found post dose 2 Pf…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Here's the piece of propaganda she's citing They take an unrepresentative sample of covid+ people w/diagnoses in the US…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Also this @CDCMMWR "study" she cites completely glosses over the fact the rate of myocarditis they found post dose 2 Pf…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Here's the piece of propaganda she's citing They take an unrepresentative sample of covid+ people w/diagnoses in the US…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Also this @CDCMMWR "study" she cites completely glosses over the fact the rate of myocarditis they found post dose 2 Pf…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Also this @CDCMMWR "study" she cites completely glosses over the fact the rate of myocarditis they found post dose 2 Pf…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Here's the piece of propaganda she's citing They take an unrepresentative sample of covid+ people w/diagnoses in the US…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Also this @CDCMMWR "study" she cites completely glosses over the fact the rate of myocarditis they found post dose 2 Pf…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Here's the piece of propaganda she's citing They take an unrepresentative sample of covid+ people w/diagnoses in the US…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Also this @CDCMMWR "study" she cites completely glosses over the fact the rate of myocarditis they found post dose 2 Pf…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Also this @CDCMMWR "study" she cites completely glosses over the fact the rate of myocarditis they found post dose 2 Pf…
RT @MinorityView: All about protecting the vaccine program. Destroying teens just doesn't matter.
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Here's the piece of propaganda she's citing They take an unrepresentative sample of covid+ people w/diagnoses in the US…
@RidleyDM @subsix848 The stat she cited that we're all taking issue with is from this vax marketing piece. https://t.co/FWSPmQqiqK
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Also this @CDCMMWR "study" she cites completely glosses over the fact the rate of myocarditis they found post dose 2 Pf…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Also this @CDCMMWR "study" she cites completely glosses over the fact the rate of myocarditis they found post dose 2 Pf…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Also this @CDCMMWR "study" she cites completely glosses over the fact the rate of myocarditis they found post dose 2 Pf…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Here's the piece of propaganda she's citing They take an unrepresentative sample of covid+ people w/diagnoses in the US…
RT @MinorityView: All about protecting the vaccine program. Destroying teens just doesn't matter.
@walidgellad Found it. Thanks. https://t.co/470arz0uiz
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Here's the piece of propaganda she's citing They take an unrepresentative sample of covid+ people w/diagnoses in the US…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Here's the piece of propaganda she's citing They take an unrepresentative sample of covid+ people w/diagnoses in the US…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Also this @CDCMMWR "study" she cites completely glosses over the fact the rate of myocarditis they found post dose 2 Pf…
All about protecting the vaccine program. Destroying teens just doesn't matter.
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Also this @CDCMMWR "study" she cites completely glosses over the fact the rate of myocarditis they found post dose 2 Pf…
The vaccine enthusiasts always post a link to this study when someone mentions heart injuries following vaccinations.
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Here's the piece of propaganda she's citing They take an unrepresentative sample of covid+ people w/diagnoses in the US…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Also this @CDCMMWR "study" she cites completely glosses over the fact the rate of myocarditis they found post dose 2 Pf…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Here's the piece of propaganda she's citing They take an unrepresentative sample of covid+ people w/diagnoses in the US…
Also this @CDCMMWR "study" she cites completely glosses over the fact the rate of myocarditis they found post dose 2 Pfizer in 12-17 yo males was as high as 1/2800 !! https://t.co/Yc9i1Na5RQ
Here's the piece of propaganda she's citing They take an unrepresentative sample of covid+ people w/diagnoses in the US electronic health record system & compare them w people who didn't have a covid dx in the EHR & pretend that=infected vs not in
@OnTheLevelCast @BobWhencer @HuckH3 @PRFlanagan @EwwCman @Adolf_Schwab @cityoftoronto Heart issues were more common with infection from Covid than vaccination. Less severe cases produce less viral load. https://t.co/VcJb4kerJw
Con addirittura un vantaggio anche in quei rari casi di eventi avversi maggiori https://t.co/QmCnlahO7G https://t.co/ONvv31y4e7 Ovviamente la maggior parte degli studi è basata ancora sul contesto emergenziale, quindi il rapporto rischio beneficio potrebbe
@flolapatriote @ReQuiEM_Evil @ARM_Magniac Il est prouvé statistiquement que les personnes ayant eu le covid, surtout les non-vaccinées, sont plus prônes aux maladies cardiovasculaires... (https://t.co/vd1Hfmr3Kb)
@nursecaro13 @ShirlAAdams @btysonmd Here is the CDC link. The real one. Which notes that heart issues are significantly higher after Covid than after the vaccine. https://t.co/vnabLlX4r6
@AlexBerenson @CDCgov "myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination was diagnosed at a rate of 22.0–35.9 per 100,000 among males aged 12-17 " 1 in 2800 from the CDC themselves... https://t.co/sCOTntqdG2
@HooDusay @jameskostohryz @AlexBerenson @CDCgov "myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination was diagnosed at a rate of 22.0–35.9 per 100,000 among males aged 12-17 " 1 in 2800 from the CDC themselves. https://t.co/sCOTntqdG2
@dogekamil @alperlenovo @halilg_40 @GillesDeleuze17 eğer onu kastediyorsan bir yerde şu makaleye atıf var o da hoşuna gitmeyecek. hastalıktan sonra 100kda 200e kadar çıkabilen risk alıda 35e kadar çıkabiliyor. sen hangi riski alıyorsun. çalışma genişliği
@AlexBerenson @CDCgov From the source: “the risk for cardiac outcomes was 1.8–5.6 times as high after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after the second vaccine dose.” https://t.co/VBRBzsj6Ns
@Pbeaudryqc @snow_cyclist @Frank_Whonose LOL Question science et chiffres, >15M de personnes dans cette étude: https://t.co/XA0mY7SHit