@BanounHelene CDC doesn't write the opposite of what I said. https://t.co/AUtyfPn4i1
@RandPaul Your numbers are incorrect. 1/3 – SARS-CoV-2 infection/disease leads to much Higher Myocarditis risk compared to vaccine in adolescents (up to 5.6 [2 to 5.6] fold higher risk) https://t.co/R2GURLlLJk
@dadofpaddy @NiklasSchmolka @TheOmniLiberal https://t.co/mQCkm7o7sa. "How about all of them" So this one too? You are less likely to have heart complications from the vaccine than from Covid, including for teen boys and young men. So it would be good to ta
@bleezer182 @Tommy_Nicoletti @SkillTreeGaming @TheOmniLiberal https://t.co/mQCkm7o7sa. yes you are. But I'm sure you dont trust the CDC
@PatriotExtreme @LBHumphries @Positiveday1184 @kyledav50941622 @liedsuddenly @laurens13779 @MakisMD "myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination was diagnosed at a rate of 22.0–35.9 per 100,000 among males aged 12-17 " 1 in 2800 https://t.co/sCOTntqdG2
RT @19joho: And it’s not even the right comparison since covids harms are not limited to myocarditis.
@BasedRedpi17384 @WhiskeySlvrBall @imjdsharp @nypost The CDC has also said that "the risk for cardiac complications was significantly higher after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination for both males and females in all age groups." htt
RT @thebadstats: Rav is happy to give the State of the Evidence to information-starved Francis Foster and explains that for young men you a…
RT @19joho: And it’s not even the right comparison since covids harms are not limited to myocarditis.
RT @19joho: And it’s not even the right comparison since covids harms are not limited to myocarditis.
RT @19joho: And it’s not even the right comparison since covids harms are not limited to myocarditis.
RT @19joho: And it’s not even the right comparison since covids harms are not limited to myocarditis.
RT @19joho: And it’s not even the right comparison since covids harms are not limited to myocarditis.
RT @19joho: And it’s not even the right comparison since covids harms are not limited to myocarditis.
RT @19joho: And it’s not even the right comparison since covids harms are not limited to myocarditis.
RT @19joho: And it’s not even the right comparison since covids harms are not limited to myocarditis.
RT @thebadstats: Rav is happy to give the State of the Evidence to information-starved Francis Foster and explains that for young men you a…
And it’s not even the right comparison since covids harms are not limited to myocarditis.
RT @thebadstats: Rav is happy to give the State of the Evidence to information-starved Francis Foster and explains that for young men you a…
Rav is happy to give the State of the Evidence to information-starved Francis Foster and explains that for young men you are much more likely to get myocarditis from the vaccine than from Covid. Of course, he's completely wrong. https://t.co/Whhh5TELLi ht
@theePicklepower @Elennar_Linwen @nick_dowd @JReadin2022 @Nefrodar @JoJoFromJerz Try expanding your research horizons, MAGAt. https://t.co/GJIKvpncJ5
@theePicklepower @Elennar_Linwen @nick_dowd @JReadin2022 @Nefrodar @JoJoFromJerz You got nothing. I got: Teen boys ages 12-17: 2-6 times the risk of heart complications post infection compared to post vaccination Young men ages 18-29 7-8 times the risk
@theePicklepower @Elennar_Linwen @nick_dowd @JReadin2022 @Nefrodar @JoJoFromJerz 2/ Teen boys ages 12-17: 2-6 times the risk of heart complications post infection compared to post vaccination Young men ages 18-29 7-8 times the risk of heart complications
@cryptodoj @Lex_Jurgen @RedBird74003923 @nypost Here are the numbers that the CDC produced. Comparing the two. But not the individuals who fell this week of course. I am positive it is worse than told as everytime they are incorrect. It is a bad thing f
@HKhash1 @BNandRainbow https://t.co/0tSozavgtU https://t.co/Ww0VlTkmQf この辺りです 主に若年者のデータです
@DSM_Dan @trades_jared @SmellHappy3 @DiedSuddenly_ So the CDC saying myocarditis is an issue with the shot and the virus is incorrect? How many were infected and vaccinated? Why do you not believe the CDC? Why label those speaking up "celebrators" Dehu
RT @Electro331331: CDC Website. Link Below. Studies have found an increased risk for cardiac complications after SARS-CoV-2 infection and…
@aAlAKEoF7Y275 @nuko26336013394 @8zUWk6FnhTTdmxB 心筋炎の話ですよ あなたが求めたものなのでどうぞ読んでください
@TronAvatar @Debunk_the_Funk @TheChiefNerd These are estimates based on observation and non-ideal strata. There are no other studies that show even close to those estimates (which they give per million). In this https://t.co/oTiS5HTlci you see reversed sam
Aşıdan kaynaklanan Miyokardit, SARS-CoV2 viral miyokardit riskinden hala iki ila sekiz kat daha düşük. https://t.co/tumojNNYIy
@ScooterScience @ztkelly @Dr4OurNHS @ColinASylvester It's VERY RARE because FRAUDULENT STUDIES ARE HIDING THE TRUTH. Explain why those infected >30 days post vax are considered unvaxxed. https://t.co/OoRxy8CwAC
@2023_justice @Theoread11 @RayTwing @LozzaFox Obviously untrue https://t.co/HnD5ZNoIhi https://t.co/ZP1jvAvo26 https://t.co/nZ0SeMsKK4 Etc etc etc
@HiddenPinky @VigilantFox #veryrare and #verymild You will any way get COVID with this "vaccine" So, even if we believe the CDC rates you'll get both risks combined. LoL https://t.co/CiV3KiPKcw
RT @RenardJauneFL: L’honnêteté intellectuelle consiste à expliquer à ses lecteurs que le risque de myopathie est également associé au Covid…
L’honnêteté intellectuelle consiste à expliquer à ses lecteurs que le risque de myopathie est également associé au Covid et que ce facteur de risque est plus élevé que le risque associé au vaccin. Chacun décidera en son âme et conscience. https://t.co/6Uf
@cpfcbeast @AIandDesign @justin_hart Nope... read for yourself. https://t.co/5MP4L7mMpj
@Clauwild1 Não achei esta matéria especificamente, mas se procurarmos no google acharemos vários estudos (inclusive no CDC) mostrando o risco aumentado com as picadinhas. https://t.co/2WedfZYrXo
@Stfon5 @AIandDesign @justin_hart Yes, pretty much exactly that: https://t.co/5MP4L7mMpj
The @CDCgov has turned into a complete shill for the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex. Look at this dishonest graphic: https://t.co/frYFqhvL0h They completely gloss over the fact that most of the vaccinated still get infected. So your heart gets hit twic
@marketmodel Not all of the papers I gave you looked only at death. Why tell me you’ve read the papers when you haven’t? https://t.co/1ZZ8hIlQ15 No, the virulence has not decreased over time. You’re reacting emotionally and regurgitating talking points in
@slackingoff3 @TheDrJon @thevegdoc Here it is. Interesting https://t.co/B9w9iP9aQT
RT @Quidnam: @AlexBerenson This is the study they rely on. Hilariously, the "infection" cohort is constructed without regard to vax status…
@virologytruth @IanCopeland5 COVID is bad for your heart. Get vaccinated. https://t.co/dhSf3Mip7s
@Texan__Pride @disclosetv To me looks like it depends how many shots you got 1.7% chance on your first shot 1.8+% after your second dose Conclusion is that it will only keep increasing because we use the same ideas to this day🙃 https://t.co/lh9BjInrlf
RT @Try1Ban99002: @disclosetv It reads you get a 1.7 chance like things on the first shot (infection from the first original mRna) 1.8+ af…
@disclosetv It reads you get a 1.7 chance like things on the first shot (infection from the first original mRna) 1.8+ after you got your second shot. Thus leading to the conclusion that this rate will increase in fold every booster if made on the same id
@atrupar Just injecting a little data from the CDC to your post https://t.co/1Z7dFSaUDb
@td1439 @Metshubb How bout this one... https://t.co/A9ZF1aC76C
@jg091297 @badler That same publication says vaccines have a lower rate of myocarditis than covid infections a year after that article was published. They cite this paper, released after the your article which was released early 2021. https://t.co/MKDqp0A
RT @Quidnam: @AlexBerenson This is the study they rely on. Hilariously, the "infection" cohort is constructed without regard to vax status…
@MakisMD Covid infection has a higher chance of giving someone myocarditis than the vaccine, but you'll never tweet about that, interesting... https://t.co/qS4wK7rbeu https://t.co/H6DnhiMIxa
RT @Quidnam: @AlexBerenson This is the study they rely on. Hilariously, the "infection" cohort is constructed without regard to vax status…
Please do your research on heart-related issues involving COVID-19 and the Vaccines: *It's not just the CDC who has researched this, but countless other agencies/medical assocations, including NIH, Cedars-Sinai, as well as AHA Journals + countless others*
@SleepMD_zzz @jaclark2491 @DrLoupis https://t.co/qS4wK7qDoW They did but conspiracy theorists only have to do say people are lying or stats are fake and keep spewing their agenda https://t.co/f5L5FGBgMM
@DublinMimi @lrg256 @TheBigBengal @thehill Wait, we trust the CDC now? Ok, if we trust the CDC now, lets post some more statements/statistics from them: https://t.co/qS4wK7qDoW https://t.co/6ebU7Siy1v
@Bujinkan2525 @Jbabes7 @MRodTheGreatest @Lukewearechange Males 18-29 after Covid infection: 55-100 per 100k After 1 dose: 0.9-8.1 After 2 dose: 6.5-15 I am not sure the data from pre Covid but am looking, think these numbers alone show some significance
@NotAHoax @BrandonLive I think I did, like this one. My statement is easily disprovable. You can simply point to the data where myocarditis was "mild". https://t.co/yHDAJ6RI6J
RT @Quidnam: @AlexBerenson This is the study they rely on. Hilariously, the "infection" cohort is constructed without regard to vax status…
RT @Quidnam: @AlexBerenson This is the study they rely on. Hilariously, the "infection" cohort is constructed without regard to vax status…
RT @Quidnam: @AlexBerenson This is the study they rely on. Hilariously, the "infection" cohort is constructed without regard to vax status…
@TracyBethHoeg @TheChiefNerd @VPrasadMDMPH @Fynnderella1 @P_McCulloughMD @RWMaloneMD @Kevin_McKernan @molsjames @DrKellyVictory @JAMACardio @elonmusk Strange how that study wasn't referenced in the note. Instead, one that compared death outcomes 90 days po
@AlexBerenson This is the study they rely on. Hilariously, the "infection" cohort is constructed without regard to vax status (as though they wouldn't overlap). So what they're really showing is jab+infection=even worse. No kidding! https://t.co/rgysHB
@LM_Entry @CovfefeAnon @elonmusk @TheChiefNerd The study: https://t.co/4i8Jx723aU What it says is that you’re unlikely to develop myocarditis immediately after getting the jab, and that after a month, they stop looking unless they can blame it on Covid. W
@TheChiefNerd @VPrasadMDMPH @TracyBethHoeg @Fynnderella1 @P_McCulloughMD @RWMaloneMD @Kevin_McKernan @molsjames @DrKellyVictory This is the study they rely on. Hilariously, the "infection" cohort is constructed without regard to vax status (as though they
@CaveArma @gsl1776 @nytimes @TheAthletic No increase?CDC disagrees Incidences of myocarditis and myocarditis or pericarditis were calculated after first, second, unspecified, or any (first, second, or unspecified) dose of mRNA COVID-19 (BNT162b2 [Pfizer-B
@nypost I'ma just set this down here https://t.co/pqlhX5USQM
@TheMFingCOO @rjb77ca @Chesschick01 I’m not implying. https://t.co/hfe2hNZOUn
@wfaa https://t.co/qFiXjyLpja "Data from 40 health care systems participating in a large network found that the risk for cardiac complications was significantly higher after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination for both males and femal
@RobinBo01314180 @harkshetweets @Elsa_fourth The fact that you posted this shows you need to work on media and scientific literacy. respectfully. This is fiction. Covid is much more dangerous to your heart. https://t.co/RSCyP199gb
@Patchworkwords https://t.co/S59YqDuZk3 appeal To authority… and you are a rando internet person who has provided evidence and now just used an “appeal to authority” sorry but I’ll trust the CDC and the data over you
@johnnystonerosa @slowquacious @HarleyT98387309 @Matrixester @JTLovesHimself8 Not gullible enough to believe that any vaccine for pregnant women is 100% safe and effective. How gullible are you? Do you believe it? https://t.co/lAlqZcxXi6
@texasrunnerDFW @RudyHavenstein On a population level, unvaccinated had higher rates of all cause mortality and vascular events during the pandemic… https://t.co/WVgs3MgWjh
@PhilipAaaaaaaa @chris_komatsu Alright, you want more stratified data… let’s turn to reference 3 from your own paper. https://t.co/BY8i0nqdfk
@KerceWill @QuanShiYinPusa @Faye44506836 @BetsyRi66304373 Not that I think you read https://t.co/IuCSTyROyf
@silfen2 @jonboy79788314 @nypost Here is the link. When in a debate I only say fact checked info. You cannot win. Read it and weep my friend. https://t.co/gxHWif19kM
@smartwookiee @thatreviewplace @JohnRuddick2 And yet this data, like the Korean data, and like other data sets goes the other way. https://t.co/U0j6VFQnkx
CDC Website. Link Below. Studies have found an increased risk for cardiac complications after SARS-CoV-2 infection and mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, but few have compared these risks. https://t.co/gxHWif19kM
RT @KelleyKga: @nycexpatmom @TracyBethHoeg @VPrasadMDMPH @davidzweig This is the flawed MMWR they used for the rate of myocarditis post-Cov…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…
RT @DRobertaLacerda: Relatório MMWR do CDC q superestima a incidência de miocardite pós COVID por do considerar os casos notificaria em hos…