@AstorAaron Mask mandate areas vs mask optional areas: 0.5% to 1.3% reduction in spread. https://t.co/BCC7RMF6pT
@PandaBear_Mikki @CO_COVIDWATCH @GovofCO For what it's worth, he's WRONG about masks. https://t.co/zUFdUno0Uy
@buckthekid97 @cxcx0fficial @washburneffect @VaccaDave @TSN_Edge @TomPelissero @TSN_Sports The data does not support your conclusion. https://t.co/nH6kT1bCqx https://t.co/XkHOUIxpJB
RT @lord_juli: Veamos la consistencia del estudio por los datos que los CDC nos ofrecían en EEUU: https://t.co/GjEJIm4G31
@ohadsamet https://t.co/43Pl49AGBi and https://t.co/zsygph6DIz. Data suggests you would still have covid peaks in Sweden, but they would have killed far fewer people.
Veamos la consistencia del estudio por los datos que los CDC nos ofrecían en EEUU: https://t.co/GjEJIm4G31
@robertopobletef @don_ulpiano @Jou_Kaiser Las mascarillas con suerte reducen un 1% el riesgo de contagio. 3 estudios: 1- Estudio CDC. https://t.co/I15GMGuqBW Reducción 1,8 a 1,9%
RT @Freakoutery: @txsalth2o Because masks don't actually work. CDC research said that for every 200 cases in masks optional areas, a mask m…
RT @Freakoutery: @txsalth2o Because masks don't actually work. CDC research said that for every 200 cases in masks optional areas, a mask m…
@TechNAustin @ksorbsinnrvoice @megbanana7 @lone_rides People have posted "studies" that supposedly prove masking does significantly slow the spread and every time I read them they are speculative or they admit that they failed to account for other factors
RT @uw_chatfotd: Aunque su condado o estado no tenga un mandato de máscara, continuando usando una máscara en interiores ayuda a prevenir l…
即使您所在的县或州没有戴口罩的规定,在室内继续戴口罩有助于防止 COVID-19 的传播。 https://t.co/HaQH9Ibxyb #coronavirus #covid19 #corona #virus #quarantine #socialdistancing #pandemic #graphic #health #publichealth #chinese #letschat #uwchat https://t.co/G4gUlRhkEw
Aunque su condado o estado no tenga un mandato de máscara, continuando usando una máscara en interiores ayuda a prevenir la propagación de COVID-19. https://t.co/HaQH9Ibxyb https://t.co/xuL8ffRFdz
Even if your county or state does not have a mask mandate,continuing to wear a mask while indoors helps prevent spread of COVID-19 https://t.co/HaQH9Ibxyb #coronavirus #covid19 #corona #virus #quarantine #socialdistancing #pandemic #health #publichealth #e
@GreenLe69138272 @ReallyUlysses @NeverSleever This concludes masks are useful but if you read past page 1 they only reduce covid cases by 1.8% after 100 days. https://t.co/gLUa6HUmTl via @CDCgov
@karol @mattyglesias "Mandates make no difference." Please show your work. https://t.co/6gm7JCEwHm
@Jennife26687573 @blondiedag @NC_Governor According to the CDC, they only reduced cases by 1%. Yall use them as your Bible so take them for their word...MASKS...DON'T....WORK https://t.co/th9r1CT0Vr
@gabegard @Adogwalker77 @WRAL Maybe let's start with the CDC's study showing a 1% decrease in cases in places where masks were required. https://t.co/th9r1DaCk1
@DerMitDenZahlen @LTebart @G_J_60 @Karl_Lauterbach Ich hab zwei Studien angeführt. Hier noch eine, die bis in den Dezember geht. https://t.co/XdRdZkFg0M
@LisaASmithChatt @malar0ne @ENirenberg Yeah! What a moron! Btw. Did you happen to see that the CDC agrees with him? https://t.co/8WkY4O6U4l https://t.co/aMsgLb8DNu
@2020_Vision_ @memec61 @Robin81647 @james_mclamb @BuckSexton Right. Need better info than that one. There is better info here the conclusion is that the masks did the reducing but read and you find they failed to account for other factors. https://t.co/
RT @Freakoutery: @txsalth2o Because masks don't actually work. CDC research said that for every 200 cases in masks optional areas, a mask m…
@pseudnonymus @statesman It's three sources, including an analysis. This is what APH knows that we don't. https://t.co/udBNl6Tfd4 https://t.co/5DwL6SSZs3 https://t.co/bMBw8vXI4P
@myrabatchelder How bout this? https://t.co/YBOQvWUL15
RT @Freakoutery: @txsalth2o Because masks don't actually work. CDC research said that for every 200 cases in masks optional areas, a mask m…
RT @Freakoutery: @txsalth2o Because masks don't actually work. CDC research said that for every 200 cases in masks optional areas, a mask m…
RT @Freakoutery: @txsalth2o Because masks don't actually work. CDC research said that for every 200 cases in masks optional areas, a mask m…
@txsalth2o Because masks don't actually work. CDC research said that for every 200 cases in masks optional areas, a mask mandated area would get between 199 and 197 cases. That's literally from the mouth of the CDC. https://t.co/BCC7RMF6pT
RT @sweetdeesez: “Daily case and death growth rates before implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the refere…
@KashPrime @jvipondmd @deejcane @TorontoStar “Daily case and death growth rates before implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the reference period.” Directly from the CDC’s newest mask study- Masks have so far provided a max
@mentalfloss999 @RandolphTGrant @MattWelch @Jamoy4 What I find from CDC. https://t.co/rTDMB9JCBk A claimed reduction in the spread of less than 2% at 81 days. BUT read the paper and you find that they did not account for other factors. Which means they c
@Polytropic @RebelNewsOnline Which ones? Masks don't significantly slow or prevent the spread... https://t.co/KqiebJEPLR Masks do... https://t.co/rTDMB9s1JM
RT @WissamAzma: لى أي مدى تعتقد أن وضع #الكمامة يقلل من حالات الإصابة بالفيروس؟ 50٪؟ 60٪؟ 35٪؟ لا❗️بل أقل من 0.5% حسب دراسة نشرها مركز الس…
RT @WissamAzma: لى أي مدى تعتقد أن وضع #الكمامة يقلل من حالات الإصابة بالفيروس؟ 50٪؟ 60٪؟ 35٪؟ لا❗️بل أقل من 0.5% حسب دراسة نشرها مركز الس…
RT @WissamAzma: @NedaaAlkhamis حسب دراسة نشرها مركز السيطرة على الأمراض الأميركي CDC وضع #الكمامة يقلل من حالات الإصابة بالفيروس أقل من 0.5…
RT @WissamAzma: @NedaaAlkhamis حسب دراسة نشرها مركز السيطرة على الأمراض الأميركي CDC وضع #الكمامة يقلل من حالات الإصابة بالفيروس أقل من 0.5…
@kurteichenwald @adamcarolla Maybe you prefer this one? Now go read it carefully. "the models did not control for other policies that might affect case and death rates" See the issue??? https://t.co/rTDMB9s1JM
@seekthe35613266 @SteveKrak Is it? Can you cite some peer-reviewed papers to that effect? :) I've seen plausible-looking studies that came to conclusions in both directions. See just for instance https://t.co/XqNo5aVvhm
RT @WissamAzma: لى أي مدى تعتقد أن وضع #الكمامة يقلل من حالات الإصابة بالفيروس؟ 50٪؟ 60٪؟ 35٪؟ لا❗️بل أقل من 0.5% حسب دراسة نشرها مركز الس…
RT @WissamAzma: @NedaaAlkhamis حسب دراسة نشرها مركز السيطرة على الأمراض الأميركي CDC وضع #الكمامة يقلل من حالات الإصابة بالفيروس أقل من 0.5…
RT @WissamAzma: @NedaaAlkhamis حسب دراسة نشرها مركز السيطرة على الأمراض الأميركي CDC وضع #الكمامة يقلل من حالات الإصابة بالفيروس أقل من 0.5…
RT @WissamAzma: @NedaaAlkhamis حسب دراسة نشرها مركز السيطرة على الأمراض الأميركي CDC وضع #الكمامة يقلل من حالات الإصابة بالفيروس أقل من 0.5…
@NedaaAlkhamis حسب دراسة نشرها مركز السيطرة على الأمراض الأميركي CDC وضع #الكمامة يقلل من حالات الإصابة بالفيروس أقل من 0.5% https://t.co/u1vHB2RbPK
@The_Biddle @krqe "Limited" is very apt! The CDC says 80-100 days after mask mandates were issued, there was only a reduction of cases by 1.8%. This is another way of saying that 98.2% of cases still happened. Not especially effective, in my opinion. https
@biteme214 @krqe According to the CDC, there is a reduction of cases by 1.8% after 80-100 days after mask mandates. In other words, even with mask mandates, 98.2% of cases will still happen. Personally, I don't consider that effective. https://t.co/S1cDiu7
RT @WissamAzma: لى أي مدى تعتقد أن وضع #الكمامة يقلل من حالات الإصابة بالفيروس؟ 50٪؟ 60٪؟ 35٪؟ لا❗️بل أقل من 0.5% حسب دراسة نشرها مركز الس…
RT @filsdelenin: @JuliaHB1 Remind me which university you got your epidemiology degree again? Once again, I provide you with research paper…
RT @filsdelenin: @JuliaHB1 Remind me which university you got your epidemiology degree again? Once again, I provide you with research paper…
RT @filsdelenin: @JuliaHB1 Remind me which university you got your epidemiology degree again? Once again, I provide you with research paper…
RT @filsdelenin: @JuliaHB1 Remind me which university you got your epidemiology degree again? Once again, I provide you with research paper…
RT @filsdelenin: @JuliaHB1 Remind me which university you got your epidemiology degree again? Once again, I provide you with research paper…
PERU…!!! omg
RT @filsdelenin: @JuliaHB1 Remind me which university you got your epidemiology degree again? Once again, I provide you with research paper…
@JuliaHB1 Was your university degree in epidemiology or public health? Little girls are not there just to be cute for your pleasure, they can also get covid. There are dire consequences to not wearing masks. https://t.co/eOdBbqpa6o https://t.co/vjcuoLXTXW
RT @filsdelenin: @JuliaHB1 Remind me which university you got your epidemiology degree again? Once again, I provide you with research paper…
RT @filsdelenin: @JuliaHB1 Remind me which university you got your epidemiology degree again? Once again, I provide you with research paper…
RT @filsdelenin: @JuliaHB1 Remind me which university you got your epidemiology degree again? Once again, I provide you with research paper…
@JuliaHB1 Remind me which university you got your epidemiology degree again? Once again, I provide you with research papers on wearing masks and spread of covid and 1 on Peru! https://t.co/vjcuoLXTXW https://t.co/O2iT61uQnV https://t.co/E4MM4OKvzf https:
@JuliaHB1 @talkRADIO Still waiting for your sources supporting your argument that masks do nothing to influence spread of Covid. These are not absurd, or cherry picked. https://t.co/I3WRp3Schm https://t.co/eOdBbqpa6o https://t.co/eaccJKTBa6 https://t.co
@ItsJustMe122 @heath3011 @Lexzie20 @FoxNews 😂🤣 Lol uhhhhhhh yes they are. You didn’t read the article. The article literally cites a study based off of data from 38 states. https://t.co/wAWPlDAIXw
@beanrulechester @JuliaHB1 @talkRADIO I responded as below, still waiting for Julia to come up with her sources. Maybe she 'cherry picks' those who she replies to because she knows very little. https://t.co/E6cm6XvWbo
@JuliaHB1 @talkRADIO What a short answer! Still waiting for your sources on mask wearing and covid spread. These aren't cherry picked either. https://t.co/I3WRp3Schm https://t.co/eOdBbqpa6o https://t.co/eaccJKTBa6 https://t.co/vjcuoLXTXW https://t.co/
@IncreaseMyT @PhilHollowayEsq @FultonCoSchools Well, the Bangladeshi one did. If you bothered to read beyond the abstract. And you moved the goalpost in that one. https://t.co/tnmKqYxUTa https://t.co/oTywAd2Z5l
@bete_n0ire @ChristianZach18 @stephen_miceli @mikeswriting @kylenabecker https://t.co/6hHXpU4Svx "Daily case and death growth rates before the implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the reference period."
@Caniac_from_ROC @rachbarnhart @DocEMurray @LPeppone Here are 2 strong studies https://t.co/Bi4shd6vcf https://t.co/Y8WETfFVFK https://t.co/kHtZARd2w9
@davidzweig Lab study: https://t.co/pd17AjppiA Policy analyses: https://t.co/c4mewet3Jc https://t.co/SkjEtwVo0P The US is an outlier in mass deaths without masks. Mask policies would help https://t.co/3fs7HLcWmz
@nbtoppers2 @m_yoquelet @MattWalshBlog The aforementioned study by Guy GP, Jr., Lee FC, Sunshine G, et al. looked at data from 2,313 individual US counties. https://t.co/gNB485EOql
RT @asosin: We have two strong studies showing that state-level face masks policies are associated with reduced COVID-19 growth rates. htt…
We have two strong studies showing that state-level face masks policies are associated with reduced COVID-19 growth rates. https://t.co/4iLwbJ5JiY https://t.co/1XWtczEc2Y https://t.co/YAYkV1DhRq
@RKelleyComms Policy needs to follow science: mask recommendations don't work. Mandates do. Requiring people to wear face masks significantly decreases the daily growth rate of reported cases. Sources: 1. https://t.co/rIMM5n8klc 2. https://t.co/zhUyGdpY6u
@Lady__Seraphina And here is a report from the CDC that shows how effective masks are. https://t.co/KUCtKJvFCr
@a649867189 @lapublichealth As I mentioned, many of the “references” listed in your post link directly to more substantial, peer-reviewed studies showing masks ARE effective. Ones like this: https://t.co/rFV21YCGj9 or this one: https://t.co/hUEbblbpEg http
@AGR3111 @DrEricDing And someone just made the point I was going to make: Dogs are smarter and more empathetic than people. https://t.co/EfEvQAokIR
@missykender @TheTobster111 @MissouriTimes @DrSamPage @AGEricSchmitt I put science in quotes because so many people use it incorrectly. It isn't something you believe in, it's a process of discovery. Here's a CDC study showing masks have essentially no eff
@ThitherCrib6723 @Yotboyo @ASoftstar @petemorristwit Not only will regular people not believe in another report CDC didn't believe those findings. Read this one carefully you will find that they did not account for other factors so they really can not say
@yabasic5 I see we share a love of policy analysis! These are two great studies. Mask policies start to work today and the effect size increases over time. Each case prevented prevents several more cases. https://t.co/Bi4shd6vcf https://t.co/Y8WETfFVFK ht
@quidpropumpkin @AP Why would I wear a mask that does not prevent or significantly slow the spread of a virus? https://t.co/rTDMB9s1JM https://t.co/KqiebJEPLR
@JoelmFleischman @OmarMKE1 "Association of State-Issued Mask Mandates and Allowing On-Premises Restaurant Dining with County-Level COVID-19 Case and Death Growth Rates — United States, March 1–December 31, 2020 | MMWR" https://t.co/K1OifosLZb
@emw2104 @AnnCoulter Better to read the study linked in the article and understand the issue with the study. It may be like this one where the conclusions left out very very important information that was in the study. https://t.co/rTDMB9s1JM
@jstephenson84 @AnnCoulter Got a link to that? You need to read carefully because many times the study does not say what they claim it does. Like this one, read carefully.p https://t.co/rTDMB9s1JM
@Airylawyer @AnnCoulter Is there? Have a link to this study as I sure would love to check it out. You have to check them carefully. Else you find a study that claims something but careful reading shows that not to be the case at all. Such as this one. h
@GallihughDeb @JeffSharlet Social media scientist.. Love that one. By the way it is a CDC report that shows masks don't work. https://t.co/KqiebJEPLR Then there is the report that claims masks do work at less than 2% efficacy BUT they failed to take ot
@humerusfx @NoWokeWalker @Vandal_Izer @prageru @thewillwitt What idiocy? wearing a mask at restaurant most the the time (even when drinking if possible) so you don’t risk others health seems pretty data driven to me https://t.co/h8Jl1Z6Xs1
@w7B89CHoh1Vak52 @hertfordian21 @JujuliaGrace @EveryDoctorUK Indeed it does. And efficacy of masks has been known for over 100 years. https://t.co/5iDvlah1cW https://t.co/sv8cRRN9MW
@Christi_Satire That’s not a mistake. Doesn’t suit the mainstream media narrative. Read the report. https://t.co/A11Za8tS1L
@Lee_Tourneau @CBSNews Weird, I can't find that. https://t.co/LDu9G5vvYK
@fachoconserva20 Es que sí funcionan, pero en la práctica su utilidad y su impacto es en un % bastante bajo. Seguirá habiendo contagios, 1.8 % de reducción en CDC https://t.co/T7hVgM2NVH Estudio de Stanford con efectividad del 11% para quirúrgica y 5% para
Association of State-Issued Mask Mandates and Allowing ... https://t.co/qKTDg0QFPx