RT @lord_juli: @BuenoEnfurecido @toni17lopez Medido por los CDC y corroborado con los datos en España. Estadísticamente insignificante: ~1…
@v9GzJ4EEaAUYblZ ついでに米CDCでも独自に行ったアメリカ合衆国の実測統計に基づく論文も載せといてやるよ。 マスク義務化の州と非義務化の州での感染者およびコロナ死の推移が決定的に差が出たという結果だ。 最早、言い逃れの出来ない事実だ。 https://t.co/4ZdEup1vXw
@sj_ca1867 @CeeKingJustice @JeromeAdamsMD @be_prosperous1 "Mask mandates were associated with a 0.5 percentage point decrease (p = 0.02) in daily COVID-19 case growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.1, 1.5, 1.7, and 1.8 percentage p
@TactNowInfo @dockaurG Not one of them saw any reduction in transmission vs unmasked, INCLUDING N95 masks. https://t.co/N8edwcU608 https://t.co/al2Itds6aW https://t.co/TB1c2atWmv https://t.co/nkZ4FyG4IN https://t.co/SVodcUUy6H https://t.co/QvFw8pc5jK
@StillShakinIt That's my fav analogy! Condoms & birth control pills: 98+% effective w/ perfect use Real world use: 87% & 93% Masks: CDC claims, what, 80%? Real world use, per CDC study: <2% https://t.co/tGoBrG4QPi
@mr_nuzum @StillShakinIt @EpiEllie Condoms & birth control pills: 98+% effective w/ perfect use Real world use: 87% & 93% Masks: CDC claims, what, 80%? Real world use, per CDC study: <2% https://t.co/tGoBrG4QPi
@sloeginpsyop Makes me think of the birth control pill If used perfectly= 99+% efficacy Real world use (w/ flawed humans)= 96+% Masks used "perfectly"= What's CDC say? 80% reduced risk? Real world = <2% Sure, still blame the flawed humans!! https://t.
@BretOlson8 @NoCRTinSchools @EdKrassen This is what I find on that link. https://t.co/SSU2Vs2XnJ
@JygaBite @amandalhu The CDC told us in '21 that masks only reduce cases by less than 2%! https://t.co/xZLXASDKTC
@SpencerJonesMPH But masks are also one part of a multipart prevention strategy. In addition to masking indoors, I’m not yet eating inside restaurants. See, for example: https://t.co/03Lv4hKcSQ
RT @Musa18103218: Association of State-Issued Mask Mandates and Allowing ... https://t.co/2XfgT0XqZr via @CDCgov
@nickpopemod @michaelpsenger CDC's own data shows they're worthless. "Mar 1 - Dec 31, 2020, state-issued mask mandates associated with a 0.5% - 1.8% decrease in daily COVID-19 case growth rates" *Not* <2% decrease in total cases! <2% decrease in G
@MitchellAdams90 @DaneEssler @AmericaShaman @AaronJMoriarity @akafacehots The CDC told us in '21 that masks only reduce cases by less than 2%! https://t.co/JccXYRkShA N95's are actually PAINFUL to have on your face for more than about 10 minutes. #MASK
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @JuliaRaifman: The study findings are also aligned with other strong DiD event study analyses https://t.co/Y8WETfGtvi
Well, yes. And, would be even better if essential spaces still had REAL mandates with REAL N95s and a public information campaign. (Hint: gappy surgicals and wearing a mask under your nose don’t count). Thanks for sharing!
The study findings are also aligned with other strong DiD event study analyses https://t.co/Y8WETfGtvi
@strauss_matt And another one. https://t.co/YB6MT9IKUS
@Sweet_Sake1 @JehnonJ @DiedSuddenly_ https://t.co/yFchinGtHM skip down to 6th paragraph. Masks made no difference in spread. "Mask mandates were associated with a 0.5 percentage point decrease" - read the whole thing.
@Mimsy2020 @topohobo @chicagobars reopening on-premises dining at restaurants, a known risk factor associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection (2), is associated with increased COVID-19 cases and deaths, particularly in the absence of mask mandates https://t.co/W
@doc_gero I've yet to hear anyone compare masking to the birth control pill. I always learned PERFECT USE = 99+% effective. Real world use= ~96% Why is masking 50% effective (per CDC) Real world results = <1% Yet, human error still blamed?! https://t.c
@BBiloup @finstreet @Philippe_Parola Après 1 an d’essai, le 5 mars 2021, une étude qui compare les régions avec et sans masque. -0,018%! Chacun met le curseur où il veut. Mais 0,018% par jour semble bien négligeable tant le 0 est proche. sans compter la
@WeiZhangAtmos @jaxxdragonan @EricTopol Why do healthcare workers wear N95s then? Have you disproven this study? Solid p-values. There’s the 20% reduction in daily case growth. https://t.co/UrvLfpwJvU
@jvgraz @AJMooreHealth Effectiveness of Mask Wearing to Control Community Spread of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/kIBPPiQmWi https://t.co/wPpq6N49ej https://t.co/cSaSVmo0L3
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
@TolbertLake Right, because people who refused to wear masks despite mandates were never going to comply anyway, and guess who were more likely to get COVID and die? Even the article you posted has issues with its own study. By the way, here's a better st
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask…
83. OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE Two more studies of mask mandates across US states, again showing the localities with mask mandates had lower transmission whilst the mandates were in place, and lower hospitalisations from covid-19 https://t.co/IZwrdTTYgj http
I have yet to see a serious rebuttal to this study from 2020 which looked at over 2,300 US counties with mask mandates vs over 800 without. The results showed as much as 20% drop in daily case growth rate (which was 3-10% during the study period). https:/
@jaypinho Besides the Cochrane study, the other substantive point Stephens makes is this... and there's a suspicious absence of blue text on those last couple of sentences. First thing I found was this which directly contradicts it. https://t.co/AXaizcpff
RT @JuliaRaifman: In MMWR, 2020 https://t.co/SkjEtwVo0P
RT @JuliaRaifman: In MMWR, 2020 https://t.co/SkjEtwVo0P
RT @JuliaRaifman: In MMWR, 2020 https://t.co/SkjEtwVo0P
In MMWR, 2020 https://t.co/SkjEtwVo0P
@TheSGEM @GidMK @CaulfieldTim @newscomauHQ @Globalbiosec But there are tons of papers on this. Just not RCTs: https://t.co/yja3ZNApMZ https://t.co/LowUdYRj4h https://t.co/v4iQtnPwrF https://t.co/kNSLPlZgG1 https://t.co/VE9tyt5uF3 https://t.co/CfZWA4Kcli h
@ZombyWoof2022 @jimmy_dore @lisa_iannattone Wow. Could you be any more obtuse? Masks work to reduce COVID cases: https://t.co/kIBPPiQmWi https://t.co/cSaSVmo0L3 https://t.co/wPpq6N49ej
@jimmy_dore @lisa_iannattone Actual studies, not opinion pieces, that Dore will never consider: Masks work to reduce COVID cases: https://t.co/kIBPPiQmWi https://t.co/wPpq6N49ej https://t.co/cSaSVmo0L3
@PaulQuinn1984 @mikethemadbiol @aetiology @EpiEllie 2. Masks don’t work: try again, see this tweet from CDC ID doc citing multiple articles and reports showing mask efficacy. https://t.co/YDV7zB1MFu
@nilikm @Billius27 Not a single one is peer reviewed, all are observational or randomized community studies. These are actual RCT studies, all show no benefits. https://t.co/Ojtsod56eg https://t.co/gN5CTSU0CI https://t.co/BQrQQYHDeO https://t.co/V3wVcC0
@CharlotteNC2022 @DiedSuddenly_ Peer reviewed, dozens of RCT mask studies over 30 yrs proving masks ineffective?https://t.co/Ojtsod56eg https://t.co/gN5CTSU0CI https://t.co/BQrQQYHDeO https://t.co/V3wVcC0OGb https://t.co/TiaCi28DFJ https://t.co/NAAIL
@TrumpDIDWin1 @Papabare2024 @JedediahBila I’m guessing you’re referring to this study, which measured the effect of mask MANDATES’ effect on Covid GROWTH RATES, concluding that mandates had a statistically significant effect in reducing spread & should
@justin_hart Was talking about this one. Everything they said turned out to be incorrect and not once has one restaurant been the epicenter of a super spreader event. And this "study" was used for so long to tout the efficacy of masking. https://t.co/2GrIY
@kprather88 Links to peer reviewed RCT studies below. https://t.co/Ojtsod56eg https://t.co/gN5CTSU0CI https://t.co/BQrQQYHDeO https://t.co/V3wVcC0OGb https://t.co/TiaCi28DFJ https://t.co/NAAIL3LmLN https://t.co/93gO8bl6g0 https://t.co/s4lJgfq6yo
@coevidizover @MrAhmadKMalik Since you’ve repeatedly demonstrated your inability to live in reality with facts - and again every anti-masker is an opportunity … https://t.co/qCy7vlORRb
@worldsman14 @JustinRothWX @elonmusk And even from the CDC: https://t.co/oqjMF7Fx1Z go down about half way: Mask mandates were associated with a 0.5 percentage point decrease (p = 0.02) in daily COVID-19 case growth rates 1–20 days --- you are right, it
@YoloCountyCA The mask only give you a false sense of security. CDC'S own Study Shows these mask don't help stop the spread or infection. Work on strengthening your immune system so you can fight off these viruses, you know like before they brainwashed us
@BronzeTalos @KellyGoodmanPhD @DrSusanOliver1 I guess I should leave this selection of observational and other studies here too… https://t.co/X0gJUu6b5S
@Scooter_Solo8 @DeanGou77434347 @BrentLeeSDCIC Cool story my dude. https://t.co/SGJGwJiqYo
@GoingNomadUK Association of State-Issued Mask Mandates and Allowing On-Premises Restaurant Dining with County-Level COVID-19 Case and Death Growth Rates — United States, March 1–December 31, 2020 https://t.co/5KrZv1iY5y
@CRXclusive @kylenabecker And another... "Mandating masks was associated with a decrease in daily COVID-19 case and death growth rates" https://t.co/rFUOP94anB
@JonesPhD @CaulfieldTim @adamsmiller @AntibioticDoc @AmeshAA like this one: https://t.co/kNSLPlZgG1
@justinAB_SF @bobepidemiology So so many. Here is just one. But look at any state's or country's case rate that dropped mask mandates. When masks were used the cases were less. It can be easily seen on every graph. https://t.co/c5Zwoe364d
RT @ooana: 😂😂😂😂 wow. Holy shit. So much of our media I think not only had a massive hard on for hating Trump - it was a chance for them to…
😂😂😂😂 wow. Holy shit. So much of our media I think not only had a massive hard on for hating Trump - it was a chance for them to let their sociopathy fly free. That’s it. They got their day. We got in the way. People have NO idea how much of American TV
FYI, an étude in medical study literacy.
@Scizz8 @protakill @PeterDClack Like mask science? Peer reviewed RCT mask studies - https://t.co/lUexYbRFOU https://t.co/Ojtsod56eg https://t.co/gN5CTSU0CI https://t.co/BQrQQYHDeO https://t.co/V3wVcC0OGb https://t.co/TiaCi28DFJ https://t.co/NAAIL3Lm
@yaneerbaryam These peer reviewed studies from the CDC +more say no. https://t.co/lUexYbRFOU https://t.co/Ojtsod56eg https://t.co/gN5CTSU0CI https://t.co/BQrQQYHDeO https://t.co/V3wVcC0OGb https://t.co/TiaCi28DFJ https://t.co/NAAIL3LmLN https://t.co
@Hollywood1114 @UndercoverFBI9 @SavageNomad12 @PapiTrumpo Now dont be lazy read the entire study. It shows that those forced to mask and those with no mask mandates have the same ir nearly the same levels of infections and deaths. https://t.co/ai7zSTNp9F
@solid2gas @Calif_Today_NTD But here you go: https://t.co/NM59lSTJvq
@photographerXA @Matt_Clough @AnnaWondering @JamesfWells @whykeepitup @VikiLovesFACS If science is a debate, and discussion - then you wouldn't make blanket statements that you flatly refuse to converse with someone based upon their profile picture alone.
RT @jimearl666: Dore exhibits a reckless and malicious disregard for the truth: "Mask mandates were associated with statistically significa…
Dore exhibits a reckless and malicious disregard for the truth: "Mask mandates were associated with statistically significant decreases in county-level daily COVID-19 case and death growth rates within 20 days of implementation." https://t.co/cSaSVmoyAB