@USAtheGreat89 @CodewordCovfefe @DonaldJTrumpJr Actually, places that have had higher mask use have also enjoyed lower case counts. Of course, people wearing masks under their noses and under their chins do nothing to help stop the spread. https://t.co/iz
@BrianKJones8 @jaemdpc @erichhartmann This one claims they are less than 2% effective but read it close and you find they did not take other factors into account. https://t.co/rTDMB9s1JM
RT @mipardudire: Las 😷 son un fetiche, hay q repetirlo aunque sea una perogrullada. Por qué? Porque la mentira, para q sea aceptada, debe…
These resources are recommended by #4actionpanel speaker @JuliaRaifman: https://t.co/RMYFGuM9YR https://t.co/bcSm7ciooV https://t.co/ZoLZLVLz8T
@SPTHKI @lasleh @iltasanomat Tästä on näyttöä vaikka millä mitalla. Esim. @MIT’n https://t.co/pkWnrjtzhV ja @CDCgov’n https://t.co/aeOq3Fo6rL. Maalaisjärkelläkin tajuaa, että lähikontaktien kautta leviävän virukseen tehoavat lähikontakteja vähentävät toime
RT @BuddingHomeste1: @goddass @Le_Andrew_ @WichitaUSD259 So, as someone who allegedly "trusts the science," you've DEFINITELY changed your…
@goddass @Le_Andrew_ @WichitaUSD259 So, as someone who allegedly "trusts the science," you've DEFINITELY changed your mind now that you've been presented with "the science," right? Have you got more conclusive evidence to present, or are we all done here?
@ErinTiernan @bostonherald Even @CDCgov reports that #maskmandate https://t.co/dje8JHJ9Hy makes a difference! Playing politics... looks like Baker is playing politics at the expense of MA residents.
@ItIsAlwaysN0w @martajewson Actually there’s lots of data in support of mask mandates. https://t.co/8xb0ndaHnr
@calmrainyday @isrPiccolo @y1shaul @yairlapid הCDC האמריקאי (גורם מספיק מוסמך ואמין?) ערך מחקר מקיף בארה"ב בתקופת המגיפה. מצורפת הטבלה שמסכמת את יעילות המסיכות בהורדת ההדבקות: והלינק למאמר: https://t.co/d1Uy22L8vH https://t.co/naf8MnTyhw
@fallonholloway @BrandiKruse It is not "non negligible". https://t.co/1p3jTbcnlH https://t.co/GwS6x0qtqx
RT @skepteis: @RFanciola @DerGastrotester @cocoz62277008 @sabineguadagni1 @EnableSuccess1 @SwissScience_TF "Allowing on-premises restaurant…
TRAD «L’autorisation de dîner au restaurant été associée à une augmentation des taux quotidiens de croissance des cas Covid, 41 à 100 jours après la mise en œuvre et de l'augmentation des taux de croissance quotidiens des décès 61 à 100 jours après la mise
@RFanciola @DerGastrotester @cocoz62277008 @sabineguadagni1 @EnableSuccess1 @SwissScience_TF "Allowing on-premises restaurant dining was associated with an increase in daily COVID-19 case growth rates 41–100 days after implementation and an increase in dai
@EmenaOTSJackDor @NattyBumppo15 @murderhole720 @brown44531 @AymanM @ilovebuvette Yes it is. Indoor dining is a huge source of infections. https://t.co/HQAyEF3L0y
@dav5 @GovernorTomWolf @CDCgov This is from the CDC endorsing masks in conjunction with limiting indoor dining, I'm sure there are more instances and supporting docs regarding the efficacy of masks if you look for them. https://t.co/GhI8fjIXI0
@LegendaryEnergy Here's a fact check on the science of masks; CDC's own study found that mask mandates only reduced transmission etc by *at most* 1.9%. https://t.co/vQ5AmfWhsA
Most people still don't seem to realize that CDC's own study of mask mandate effectiveness found that masks, at best, only reduce cases by 1.9%. Similarly low effect sizes for indoor dining mandates. Ignore their bogus slides, look at the actual science
@W0rd0fG0d Or all States combined . . . "Mask mandates were associated with statistically significant decreases in county-level daily COVID-19 case and death growth rates within 20 days of implementation." So who is cherry picking? https://t.co/pfVGUvN
@michelletandler You can already do busses and ubers without masks in half the country and will continue to be able to do so indefinitely. And this is fine because mask mandates only affect infection rate by 0.5%. https://t.co/BCC7RMF6pT
@NathanMackBrown Mask mandates are associated with a 0.5% reduction in spread. So everyone following her sign would make her 0.5% less tired. CDC study: https://t.co/BCC7RMF6pT
RT @9KUSATHINKS: As far as masks go @VoteNotRed you may want to read this article. Masks In a new study, the CDC found face #masks had a N…
RT @9KUSATHINKS: As far as masks go @VoteNotRed you may want to read this article. Masks In a new study, the CDC found face #masks had a N…
As far as masks go @VoteNotRed you may want to read this article. Masks In a new study, the CDC found face #masks had a NEGLIGIBLE IMPACT on coronavirus numbers that didn’t exceed statistical margins of error.” 3/9/21 https://t.co/rGpFjJxcB4 https://t.co/
@Arlington_Dad @DrTomori Here’s one example: https://t.co/6mdfsHIyTB
RT @sweetdeesez: @hkislander17 @Travis_in_Flint Not according to the CDC’s most recent study (linked below at the top of the thread), or ne…
@csswebcloud @josevenegas2017 ajaja saco wea pa grande, aweonao e ignorante: 1- Estudio CDC. https://t.co/I15GMGuqBW Reducción 1,8 a 1,9%
@Bryce_Martel @MC_Cards @KuyaPB Here’s one of the major studies which shows a statistically significant decrease in covid rates in the 2700 counties in America that implemented mask mandates compared with those that didn’t -and that’s cloth and improper we
RT @Freakoutery: @KarenVaccinated @TPCarney If by "work" you mean 0.5% to 1.5% reduction in spread then sure. But that doesn't mean they're…
@KarenVaccinated @TPCarney If by "work" you mean 0.5% to 1.5% reduction in spread then sure. But that doesn't mean they're effective at arresting spread. https://t.co/BCC7RMF6pT
@mikesasin @JessKwazz @GovofCO “In the first 20 days after implementing mask mandates, new cases slowed by 0.5 percentage points.” https://t.co/CenDQa5Mtv
@DirkBargen @vonk1970 @kyle_ferriter @billybinion Here's some peer reviewed studies on mask mandates and indoor gathering regulations. There's plenty more, but I'm sure your Google works just as well as mine. Try to be more informed. https://t.co/eiASCUKd6
@NoLore Here's one, then. https://t.co/K7ERmw3aLG
RT @sweetdeesez: @analgerbil @mmpadellan Do you have any links to studies done on real people, rather than a cartoon, that shows masks are…
@nheld @sdonline @GovMikeDeWine @OHNationalGuard "Mandating masks was associated with a decrease in daily COVID-19 case and death growth rates within 20 days of implementation." https://t.co/OgKy2hMJuG
@ReSamuelAdams @ebennett74 In any case broader analysis also showed that counties with mandates faired better. https://t.co/oTywAd2Z5l
@NickChallis92 @JGray97942412 You were comparing our restrictions to the US. The fact that their death rate is 3x ours seems relevant. They continue at ~1,000 deaths per day. Also relevant is that, though our restrictions have helped, we still haven't beat
Make sure you include the impact on case rises in your study then.
@russvought When the CDC can say with a straight face that a 0.5% in 20 days to 1.8% after 100 days is a statistically significant reduction for transmission? Hell nah. https://t.co/nQpsSQMWw2
@rooftop_voter @ebennett74 🤣😂 indeed. Answer still same. They did work. Multiple studies have shown masking and distancing reduced case loads, hospitalizations and deaths when implemented. In schools https://t.co/y4jgQQ1l2r In community https://t
@jDaz @AstorAaron Where do you get your data? I am unable to find a reputable source that supports your statement. https://t.co/RgisGltqsG https://t.co/C0K5M8LG15
@RawknRyan @ebennett74 You assume I’m out of my lane. https://t.co/oTywAd2Z5l
@whohead1 @BMR28127590 @willhumble_az @LaurieRoberts @dougducey @AZGOP Gee, that's funny. https://t.co/xWpFBfVbUT
What is the science saying? I refer you to table 2 where they compare regions with mask mandates to those same regions later which lifted them.
@Neoavatara The actual number is 0.5% to 1.8%, and that's according to the CDC. https://t.co/BCC7RMF6pT
@bc_skelly @SherylToyosi @KMOV You would be very incorrect. https://t.co/oTywAd2Z5l Not to mention our own wonderful governor squelched a study showing they worked..
@Strandz_ @TinaLisk @trish_zornio @GovofCO Mask mandates work: https://t.co/zUFdUno0Uy But your anecdotes of partial info are readily useful 🙄 Blocking for misinformation
RT @JuliaRaifman: @gowithgibbs @asosin @dartmouth @CovidActNow I am so sorry to see what is happening in Vermont & hope this helps— These…
RT @JuliaRaifman: @gowithgibbs @asosin @dartmouth @CovidActNow I am so sorry to see what is happening in Vermont & hope this helps— These…
RT @JuliaRaifman: @gowithgibbs @asosin @dartmouth @CovidActNow I am so sorry to see what is happening in Vermont & hope this helps— These…
RT @JuliaRaifman: @gowithgibbs @asosin @dartmouth @CovidActNow I am so sorry to see what is happening in Vermont & hope this helps— These…
RT @JuliaRaifman: @gowithgibbs @asosin @dartmouth @CovidActNow I am so sorry to see what is happening in Vermont & hope this helps— These…
@gowithgibbs @asosin @dartmouth @CovidActNow I am so sorry to see what is happening in Vermont & hope this helps— These are 2 peer-reviewed studies on mask policies and a CDC MMWR describing how good masks on 2 people reduce spread by about 95% htt
@MassDPH @MassGovernor “Mandating masks was associated with a decrease in daily COVID-19 case and death growth rates within 20 days of implementation. Allowing on-premises restaurant dining was associated with an increase in daily COVID-19 case growth rate
@bills_n_thrills @killedbyproxy Här en intressant CDC-studie från i våras. Mubskyddskrav vis-a-vid öppna restauranger:https://t.co/OxNRoZnxVr https://t.co/7TkUEKoR1h
@Anrhi91 @ManterolaMarco @biobio 1- Estudio CDC. https://t.co/TQdN18LmjQ Reducción 1,8 a 1,9% 1/3 https://t.co/w2j7C3qhEi
“Mandating masks was associated with a decrease in daily COVID-19 case and death growth rates within 20 days of implementation. Allowing on-premises restaurant dining was associated with an increase in daily COVID-19 case growth rates…” https://t.co/UqEsJX
@Choclo_007 @RodolfoH_ES Hay que ser ignaro y estatista para creer que los políticos hacen algo por tu bien ajjaja. 1- Estudio CDC. https://t.co/I15GMGuqBW Reducción 1,8 a 1,9% 2- Mascarillas en estudiantes CDC. https://t.co/uKPVwPCNYc 1 pcr de dif c/500
@Tullingebo @EFCswe @EngstrandConny @gorberg Det går visst det. 😊 https://t.co/WQH86rck7M
@pixfiber Surgical masks, if worn by everyone in the room, reduce transmission significantly. See e.g. https://t.co/iOdpA8gV8F Why do you keep talking about "business"?
@jbarro I’m sure you don’t care but there is actual research on this and undermines your Vibin’: https://t.co/MvUX7ADlGM
@youareloud @CamMason8 @KOINNews What do you think your image proves??? Here's some actual evidence. https://t.co/LHHKDLhaKM
@ANABA37329490 マネキンでもロボットでもなく、実際の人間がマスクを着用した現実での結果です。 CDCの調査結果からマスクを義務化した州での効果がこちらにあります。 マネキン実験ではなく、現実の結果です。 これを否定するエビデンスをあなたは何か提示できますか? https://t.co/j4iqffsErj
RT @estebanjq3: @TinaG_SD @arindube @lelia_glass @femonomics I believe these are among the best sources of information about the effectiven…
@lelia_glass @KiraboJackson Crowded indoor settings have risks that add up. I agree mask policies should pertain to when & where there is the most benefit. Indoor dining is high risk -- reducing risk can keep community transmission low so restaurants c
RT @estebanjq3: @TinaG_SD @arindube @lelia_glass @femonomics I believe these are among the best sources of information about the effectiven…
@TinaG_SD @arindube @lelia_glass @femonomics I believe these are among the best sources of information about the effectiveness of various types of masks: - https://t.co/RsmPicgk7B - https://t.co/TMul2glLg6 - https://t.co/4T4gu1sXV5 - https://t.co/yc417CiiU
RT @JustEric: Your own web site says the number is closer to 2%. https://t.co/wqwhRjvoWu
https://t.co/XnCibeSklD why does your own website say 2 percent? #liar
RT @JustEric: Your own web site says the number is closer to 2%. https://t.co/wqwhRjvoWu
Your own web site says the number is closer to 2%. https://t.co/wqwhRjvoWu
@livi_lein @PKurucar @redsteeze Do you? Prove it. https://t.co/KqiebJEPLR First one shows you are wrong. Second one claims you are correct BUT failed to account for other factors. I have found nothing better. https://t.co/rTDMB9s1JM
@BuySellTrains @Johnrigsby128 @LenBanco @patriottakes Mask vs unmask Again, no doubt you don't believe in actual data. https://t.co/7HJY8kcRAg
@elsycecicc @Revolncion @adnradiochile Ninguna sirve para nada con suerte reducen un 1% el riesgo de contagio. 1- Estudio CDC. https://t.co/I15GMGuqBW Reducción 1,8 a 1,9% 2- Mascarillas en estudiantes CDC. https://t.co/uKPVwPCNYc 1 pcr de dif c/500 alum
@TextbookAmI https://t.co/aEm1hsENMn Mask mandates had basically no impact on cases/deaths https://t.co/XcXLkoX9Lw
@andrewthesmart @jajamjamejames @WesPegden Every study that I have looked at has failed to control or account for other factors. This one claims that masks reduced the spread by almost 2%. ALMOST 2%... https://t.co/rTDMB9s1JM
@kylamb8 @RMConservative Here is the study published by the CDC https://t.co/cZjp5Ga715