RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
Heard random anecdotes from a physician!
RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
@facts_pa 😉 just making a point. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
@AdamProbolsky https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE Oops that’s not it. I might be doing a parody here
🔥🔥🔥
RT @justin_hart: Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
Oh. You mean random anecdotes shouldn’t be used as science? Tell that to the CDC. https://t.co/QR75ZOl5YE
RT @amyburto: Evidence for mask wearing just keeps growing! 😷 https://t.co/p4aUso1gMa
@staniforthl @KristenMeghan @ztobitcoin If people were not wearing masks, the spread would be more rapid and those infected would likely be hit by a higher viral load, increasing lethality. There are an abundance of studies indicating this, including real
Επειδή κάποιοι ανησυχούν https://t.co/cxtyGG2r3t, τα κομμωτήρια είναι από τους χώρους εκείνους που **γνωρίζουμε** (με evidence) οτι μπορούν να ανοίξουν με ασφάλεια (αν βεβαίως τηρηθούν απλά μέτρα): https://t.co/wDgM4qMcvJ (Εξακολουθώ να βρίσκω εντυπωσιακή
You can read that great study via the CDC link below, but if I may summarize the June 2020 study's findings? #WearAFuckingMask https://t.co/vLCFwUIqrm
@dirtroadliving1 @Liz49006033 @roussin_brent "Consistent and correct use of face coverings, when appropriate, is an important tool for minimizing spread of SARS-CoV-2 from presymptomatic, asymptomatic, and symptomatic persons." https://t.co/yW3w102BrX 6/?
@VTMNIEUWS Daarnaast tonen verscheidene studies aan dat een contactberoep toch niet zo gevaarlijk zijn Meer zelfs in heel Europa mogen ze blijven doorwerken maar enkel in België zijn contactberoepen het kantelpunt voor een derde golf🙄deze sluiting is pure
@EVHVHE @VTMNIEUWS Contactberoepen blijken weinig tot niet besmettelijk indien de veiligheidsmaatregelen gevolgd worden, de heropening na golf 1 en diverse studies van de beauty federatie(s) bewijzen dit alsook een studie van de CDC https://t.co/WT7i6hEeV
@TadeuszRozycki @wpaczos @danieltilles1 Ale klucz może być we fragmencie, który wkleiłem. Jeśli masz taką szkołę jak na fotce - maseczki, dzieci same w ławce - to transmisja jest radykalnie ograniczona (vide ten casus: https://t.co/exkYhuuLLQ). Tymczasem P
@CoronaAanval @vanranstmarc @Bv202 Contactberoepen een hoog risico ? 1 Noorse studie beweert dat er een heel klein beetje meer risico is, iets wat een studie van de CDC los van tafel veegt... https://t.co/WT7i6hmE3Z Met 30 1 broek vastnemen is niet gevaarl
@VictorAlenBE @HelevenMichiel Indien ze de maatregelen niet volgen is de kans op besmetting idd veel hoger. Nu voor echt concrete cijfers verwijs ik u graag door naar @Beautyfed_BE en andere federaties nu wat die internationale studie betreft: https://t.co
@FreedNDeed @FreckledLiberty It isn’t “science” it’s just legitimately scientifically proven. Aside from the actual research studies (like this one https://t.co/01xJArCt3p, if masks did nothing, why do surgeons wear them to prevent spreading an infection d
@Psyarchy @FreckledLiberty Here is another great study: https://t.co/aHPOcXGUds
@redsteeze MSM parroted CDC's in-depth study on MASK effectiveness: "Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from TWO STYLISTS After Exposure at a Hair Salon with a Universal Face Covering Policy" -- thank GOD for *REAL* SCIENCE!!! https://t.co/zler
@chetempochefa @RobertoBurioni @MedicalFactsIT Visto che qualcuno chiede ulteriori informazioni, eccole. https://t.co/QGDaJwk4Lr
Komaan @JanJambon, #éénminuutkappermoed!
RT @BartDeconinck: Overtuigend wetenschappelijk bewijs dat kappers - mits voorschriften - geen enkel probleem vormen voor transmissie COVID…
Overtuigend wetenschappelijk bewijs dat kappers - mits voorschriften - geen enkel probleem vormen voor transmissie COVID-19. @GLBouchez https://t.co/VcZuFazZwc
@HandNF Thanks, this is particularly interesting https://t.co/d9PFF1dxnS
@gerdosi Also if you have time would you mind to take a look at https://t.co/CbMjkZeBmp and the papers they refer (i have only read 2 cases out of lab enviroment but they have more https://t.co/nLh43ZBp0U and https://t.co/YHkLo1dm8g ). dont this ones show
A follow up report by the CDC showed that despite the stylists being Covid +, there was no spread (lack of spread was attributed to proper mask use): https://t.co/LIr1RvUtky
@javicmuniz i guess if california had ANY kind of reliable contact tracing system, we’d know what were actual hotspots and wouldn’t have to just guess what to shut down... meanwhile: https://t.co/6VRx5zOoik
@realtruthcactus @Sir_KnowlesCBE @TexAg0892 @michaeljknowles Just gonna leave three real scientific studies on mask wearing for you to consider: https://t.co/KbjZJbWiwN https://t.co/0UyfAT8L5w https://t.co/PbRBImtLSj
@rbrt__o Yes, you are right. An important paper for the power of masking (139 clients exposed, none got sick, 67 tested and those negative): https://t.co/VWyAINTH7a
@liberty_dane Så et kort, midlertidigt påbud, der nedsætter smittespredningen med op til 13% på 10 dage er "minimal effekt"? #dkpol https://t.co/hAapCPV4Xm
@SVL_1971 @Desirecharlott1 Zie mijn andere tweet. Kappers zijn niet meer besmet dan hun klanten (NL). Bemette kappers hebben het virus niet overgedragen (USA). https://t.co/lEkcQdXpVC
@Desirecharlott1 @SVL_1971 Een mooi staaltje Belgenvirologie. Evidence based medicine zoekt feiten. 1- Zijn kappers meer en vaker besmet? Niet in Nederland. Klanten besmetten dus niet hun kappers. 2- Hebben besmette kappers hun klanten besmet? Niet in de U
@kenmo757 @MrAndyNgo The idea is that if you have it, and wear a mask, you're not projecting as far to the people around you. It's just like covering a cough or sneeze. And it does work. From July: In Missouri, 2 infected hairdressers, 139 customers, 67 t
@auntbec15 I still wouldn't go... https://t.co/e442GlInux
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/JUq9qrq4bz via @CDCgov
@JAFOOFAJ @1chicklette @kmc1213 Oof, I can/can’t imagine. Masks are good, though, as a frontline of defense (obvs not the whole story). You’ve probably seen or heard of this study. (In my mind, you work at Nordstrom. 🙂 I’m not asking - just saying.) htt
I am less concerned that I have become that person that notices on how a study was cited in (checks notes) The New York Times and sends my fact check, than that data from these studies that I read has taken up space in my brain and won’t leave. 🤦🏻♀️
@nytimes I actually found two errors in this story. 1. In the salon example, only 58 of the 139 clients agreed to be tested. 72 refused. It is a noted limitation of the results. Some may have caught, they just don’t know. (1/2) https://t.co/ZAJo6jl3gQ
@GinLessIsMore So frustrating But one caveat Just so you have the info regardless of what you decide https://t.co/ocYVsgKNZi
@GinLessIsMore Do what you are comfortable with......here is an article from the CDC that applies to this situation. I work in an office with masks and not able to socially distance. Everyone has to research and make the best decisions for themselves.
@JuliaHB1 Imbecile. https://t.co/3fgmPYQrP1
@RealCDurks @Thinkingmom19 @roccogalatilaw to the studies of the NIH and CDC. "Consistent and correct use of face coverings, when appropriate, is an important tool for minimizing spread of SARS-CoV-2 from presymptomatic, asymptomatic, and symptomatic perso
RT @Spoonhead8: @Jan24827157 @padfootcare @Saffiya_Khan1 "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-1…
Science...
@DrKimSue Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@nypost Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@j0ssef2 Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@RiderBabe52 Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@mikewasson There was this: https://t.co/P7CdXcw4vC
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@kevin_willetts @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Maybe he read this: Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@BOYCOTT_ELITE @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@lokimickeysull1 @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@Stevie_Nip @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@RayB03892178 @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@Damnyankee_la @mikewisewv @Johnny_Joey Did you know better and know about this? Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/7ZrIP67dFh via @CDCgov
@rottenchester @NYGovCuomo @melissadderosa Yes, I watched too. They clearly had not been following the news here and were unprepared for this obvious question. We know masks work in salons - and NY has strict protocols. https://t.co/KcLoUo6yf4
@Chris_Chapman61 @ScottishJenbel @cushyglen @thehistoryguy Hi, what is going to be an acceptable source for you? https://t.co/Yu2aEU2uja
RT @DrGomi: @crouzet @DBlameble @LehmannDrC @DidierPittet @BAG_OFSP_UFSP @alain_berset ni celui ci , qui est intéressant : est ce que les c…