@giggs_boson @naomirwolf Evidence for them: https://t.co/mW1bfTFWoy
@jimmacjr1980 @oprman @pixieskygoddess You are right. I did misunderstand. This story is probably better than the pee story. Apples to apples. My apologies. https://t.co/TOeHfiUZ2k
“This study...what about the other 72 people? The majority weren’t even talked to. This is like me staying 'How many people who smoke cigarettes didn’t get lung cancer? Does that mean it doesn’t cause lung cancer?'" - @KristenMeghan, OSHA PPE Expert https:
@GregWest_HALOJM Pretty simple concept: something is better than nothing. Real world example: https://t.co/V9uJa5LkkG
@nbm_1981 @CBrunsholm I artiklen henvises der ellers til et real life study fra CDC med nogle frisører i Michigan https://t.co/nSj2EpZnZS
An investigation in Missouri found no clients were known to be infected with COVID-19 after 139 clients were exposed to two hair stylists with the disease. Everyone wore face coverings, which likely helped prevent spread of COVID-19. https://t.co/SliUOlJK
@eVDBGQP1vRkvakv @Drfm11 でも美容院の論文は知ってますよ。 https://t.co/IsxmfVowIh ほら、マスクには効果あるじゃないですか! マスクしましょうよ、コロナ終わらせたいから。
@TomaszN52304316 @poldek34 @czasow @MZ_GOV_PL Miło, że zmieniasz temat, ale to nie konkret, to opinia, niestety, ignoranta. Konkret masz na przykład tutaj: https://t.co/exkYhuuLLQ
RT @Balacla27914533: 2/2 symptomatic hairstylists served 139 clients. No one got sick. If you read a little deeper, it is acknowledged that…
RT @Balacla27914533: 2/2 symptomatic hairstylists served 139 clients. No one got sick. If you read a little deeper, it is acknowledged that…
RT @Balacla27914533: 2/2 symptomatic hairstylists served 139 clients. No one got sick. If you read a little deeper, it is acknowledged that…
@partiarazem @ZandbergRAZEM @PolsatNewsPL Lockdown, ale przemyślany - nie całkowity. Zamykanie niektórych branży jest sprzeczne z tym co pokazują badania i emocjonalnie napędza antykowidziarzy... Może zamiast zamykania - większe kary za brak masek, czy org
RT @raichle6ix: @TorontoStar No detail provided but since this spans several days we can assume the staff were infected. Assuming everyone…
RT @Balacla27914533: 2/2 symptomatic hairstylists served 139 clients. No one got sick. If you read a little deeper, it is acknowledged that…
@tacostam @MacNowak @Zpopk To musi być jakiś cud, bo maseczki przecież nie działają: https://t.co/exkYhuuLLQ!
RT @DrZoeHyde: (1/3) Study of 2 hairstylists with #COVID19. Both wore masks at work, as did clients. No cases were reported among their 139…
RT @DrZoeHyde: (1/3) Study of 2 hairstylists with #COVID19. Both wore masks at work, as did clients. No cases were reported among their 139…
آجکل اس فوٹو پر تنقید ہو رہی ہے۔ https://t.co/OTwh8ZuxSn یہ امریکہ کی وبائی کنٹرول کی آفیشل ویب سائٹ پر شائع شدہ تحقیقی رپورٹ ہے۔ طبی جریدہ میں بھی شائع ہوچکی ہے۔ اگر مریض اور دیگر افراد نے ماسک پہنے ہوں اور مناسب احتیاط کریں تو وبا کے پھیلنے کا اندیشہ بہ
@MemesOfPakistan اگر آپ اسے پڑھ سکیں تو یہ امریکہ کی ہیلتھ کی افیشل سائیٹ پر سٹڈی کا لنک ہے۔ https://t.co/OTwh8ZuxSn
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/LrrrDgcruS via @CDCgov
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists After Exposure at a Hair Salon with a Universal Face Covering Policy — Springfield, Missouri, May 2020 | MMWR https://t.co/LrrrDgcruS
@c_thorough @jcoots43 @AlexBerenson Just curious, what was your reaction when this story came out? Were those 139 salon customers just genetically superior, or is the MSM lying again? https://t.co/cLOOBNm4dU
@alexanderdecroo @YvesCoppieters @GLBouchez @Sophie_Wilmes @Maggie_DeBlock Peut-on voir les données sur les "clusters" provoqués par coiffeurs, esthétiques en 🇧🇪 qui justifieraient leur refermeture ? Voici une preuve que le risque est nul : CDC USA : https
@POTUS @JoeBiden This is a Fact ✅, wearing a mask reduces SARS-CoV exposure. Sources: https://t.co/5PeZkhlXbb https://t.co/qVEvOHKxvu https://t.co/RFlYNpZiCA
@LarryBoorstein @BeschlossDC 3/ Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/s2WM7NzAIS via @CDCgov
@MykeVw @criodanomurchu My immediate question is where is the comparison of different masks and fits? Yes bad masks affect the data. Bandanas actually increase your chance of getting covid but a mask made of triple layers of cotton or non woven fabric incr
@threemadness Getting a haircut is extremely low risk https://t.co/hOYUlOtmMj
@campanac @AlexBerenson https://t.co/8VQBH79sTg https://t.co/zY1Y70erP1 https://t.co/wLJ7DQE9vJ https://t.co/XJpKHq7O4t More? Or is this enough?
#wearAMask 👍🏼👏🏼✌🏼😷 Get the Vaccine when you’re able to! Be the Difference! https://t.co/wgmy6PBRGD
@GaleMarieNOLA @RevMelanieNOLA https://t.co/Z4Y3OXtMTg The short answer to your question is that masks really work. Universal mask use + vaccination are the best tools that we have against this virus. Masks along with social isolation almost wiped out flu
@elium2 Yes. If you both are diligent about mask use. There was an MMWR on it. https://t.co/IZvBpLw7fm
@KidsB4Covid @SylviaTilaks @Morag68982676 @TigressEllie Remember this real life example from last year https://t.co/8zWE8t6OMk
@daveirl Exactly that, what makes it worse is that with mask wearing and face coverings barbers and hairdressers are about the safest commercial settings you can get. Follow the science? https://t.co/jqSvOLHCwT
@_7SaD_ @FelixMTP1 @MyriamArnaux1 @Madamuni @MahmoudZureik 1) J'ai écrit quelque part qu'il doit être obligatoire en extérieur ? 2) https://t.co/hCEwtLcOZe https://t.co/e99Us9vGyQ https://t.co/YKW4TWIjI7 https://t.co/yXcFYoaCvc https://t.co/vbPxZWLpB7 http
@mileslunn @haleewalsh86 @Milhouse_Van_Ho @MichelleRempel This is the study that your Nature article is providing Citation for It is also the study they were citing in your other article It is an observational study, not an RCT study There was no control g
@jwbisbatman @CNN Masks protect others if you have Covid. You wouldn’t know you have viral shed before symptoms appear or if you are asymptotic. https://t.co/PRCAImWMgH masks are not unconstitutional. We have to be dressed in public. Private businesses can
@GeekJimi @michaelmalice They’ve been collecting data for a year now, and some scientific conclusions can be drawn. Not all science can be done in a lab. And we’re never going to do a causal study unless we decide to be nazis. https://t.co/Jfam9K4Eir
@GeorgeHandiman @kdino @davidgura Not sure what you mean my zero proof unless you hate epidemiology - but this is one of my favorite studies. I went back to my hairdresser and helped support her small business. https://t.co/epc7AatJ31
@johncardillo It's tragic you believe otherwise: https://t.co/mW1bfTFWoy
@gRiLLiOne @vesitel @ProMiika @JuuLeh Tsemppiä valitsemallasi tiellä! Tiede on alusta asti erottanut eri maskit toisistaan. Kangasmaskeista ei ole hyötyä, mutta muista kylläkin ja erityisesti maskinkäyttäjä ei levitä tautia samassa mitassa. Tässä tiete
@jhaskinscabrera They literally cited a couple of hairdressers in Missouri..."so masks 'may work". Seriously? Let's throw out all the rules of scientific discovery because it fits our narrative. #ForgetYourMask #FactsMatter #FactsNotFear #TruthWillPreva
@richallan100 @james7074 @TruthandFreedo8 @BrianEspino14 you might want to check the "journalist"'s reference which is a study based on 2 stylist https://t.co/rHAWZm6yh6
@giggs_boson @BonaDrag1 @michaelmalice While ventilation is key, masks are not intended to be principally to protect the wearer, but to protect transmission from the wearer. This small, but impactful study from the US is a clear way of showing how they do
@fullofbeans_sid @PeterUpsidedown @DrBonnieHenry @bcndp Another example of mask effectiveness: 2 hairstylists had symptoms in the spring of last yr; continued to cut hair. Then tested positive. 139 clients & multiple other stylists did not catch the vi
@jgrugeon @alienzamongus @BreedingPomp @portraitchaser @TMells30 @CNN Oh, and you might want to look up the word "anecdotal." https://t.co/SmGRnRnmGi
@vA0INLclEG8SGWv こんな話もあるでよ。 美容師2人が感染していてもマスク着用によって客は誰も感染しなかった。(MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2020 Jul 17;69(28):930-932. ) https://t.co/RRMiDT9v7w
@Fritzy500 “139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both the stylists and the clients wore face masks, no symptomatic secondary cases were reported; among 67 clients tested for SARS-CoV-2, all test results were ne
@CrazyTrain88217 Here is the article from the CDC. Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists... https://t.co/EhW9HFsIt2 via @CDCgov
RT @LajousMartin: Salón de belleza, uso obligatorio de cubrebocas para trabajadores y clientes. 2 estilistas sintomáticos->139 clientes->0…
RT @LajousMartin: Salón de belleza, uso obligatorio de cubrebocas para trabajadores y clientes. 2 estilistas sintomáticos->139 clientes->0…
RT @LajousMartin: Salón de belleza, uso obligatorio de cubrebocas para trabajadores y clientes. 2 estilistas sintomáticos->139 clientes->0…
RT @LajousMartin: Salón de belleza, uso obligatorio de cubrebocas para trabajadores y clientes. 2 estilistas sintomáticos->139 clientes->0…
@CrazyTrain88217 139 clients, no COVID infections: Hair salon study shows face masks work https://t.co/s2WM7NzAIS
RT @LajousMartin: Salón de belleza, uso obligatorio de cubrebocas para trabajadores y clientes. 2 estilistas sintomáticos->139 clientes->0…
RT @LajousMartin: Salón de belleza, uso obligatorio de cubrebocas para trabajadores y clientes. 2 estilistas sintomáticos->139 clientes->0…
RT @LajousMartin: Salón de belleza, uso obligatorio de cubrebocas para trabajadores y clientes. 2 estilistas sintomáticos->139 clientes->0…
RT @LajousMartin: Salón de belleza, uso obligatorio de cubrebocas para trabajadores y clientes. 2 estilistas sintomáticos->139 clientes->0…
Veo demasiados estudios ya que apuntan a que con sana distancia, ventilación y uso de cubrebocas es posible empezar una reapertura más masiva. Ya hay bastante inmunidad por contagio, más vacunas, más lo que ya hemos aprendido, pasando verano podría ser ya
#UsaCubrebocas y de preferencia #doublemask
RT @LajousMartin: Salón de belleza, uso obligatorio de cubrebocas para trabajadores y clientes. 2 estilistas sintomáticos->139 clientes->0…
Esto es de hace casi un año y lo dijimos varias veces pero pues “el cubrebocas sirve para lo que sirve y no sirve para lo que, desafortunadamente no sirve” como política de gobierno
Salón de belleza, uso obligatorio de cubrebocas para trabajadores y clientes. 2 estilistas sintomáticos->139 clientes->0 contagios. En la reapertura #Covid_19mx el uso del cubrebocas se vuelve más importante en espacios cerrados. https://t.co/M7sDDZl
RT @JSchmukler: 23/ Miren: en Missouri en Julio dos estilistas CON SÍNTOMAS atendieron a 139 clientes entre los dos. tanto estilista como c…
@GevaertThomas Kappers: https://t.co/XSr7GRIkH1
RT @JSchmukler: 23/ Miren: en Missouri en Julio dos estilistas CON SÍNTOMAS atendieron a 139 clientes entre los dos. tanto estilista como c…
RT @JSchmukler: 23/ Miren: en Missouri en Julio dos estilistas CON SÍNTOMAS atendieron a 139 clientes entre los dos. tanto estilista como c…
23/ Miren: en Missouri en Julio dos estilistas CON SÍNTOMAS atendieron a 139 clientes entre los dos. tanto estilista como cliente con barbijo. Contacto estrecho por 30 minutos o más. Hubo CERO CONTAGIOS. Incluso con contacto estrecho. CERO. https://t.co/
@StevenTrustrum @TweetrDon45th This one This is the “new research” for the pro-maskers. It’s very limited because it has a very small sample size. Two infections/cases Sample size does matter, as you mentioned https://t.co/Wgtfpgowip
@StevenTrustrum @TweetrDon45th Yes, which links back to the same article 🙄 & the citation that isn’t a hyperlink, when I copy & pasted it into my browser this is the study that it led me to This study showed that masks “worked” in the case of two
@StevenTrustrum @TweetrDon45th Wrong That is not a study 😂 It’s an opinion piece The author mentions some studies but doesn’t even provide proper citation 🙄 As far as I can tell this is the study that she’s talking about. It was also referenced in that CD
RT @FaheemYounus: Is COVID airborne? Rarely. Two symptomatic COVID+ hair stylists exposed 139 clients for >15 min each. Both parties wer…
@jdoubleu8 @CNBC You can see the effect already after a month. How about this case, where 2 hair stylists that were positive saw 139 clients and none of them got infected. They were both wearing masks. https://t.co/IwpE93fqlJ And how do you explain why
@BarryGadbois I agree things should not be discussed in absolutes but focused on relative risk. Not just risk to one’s self, but to the community. The use of masks is harm reduction. There are plenty of real life examples but here’s one from MMWR https://t
@scrowder "The institute’s models also predicted that, as of 23 September, increasing US mask use to 95% — a level observed in Singapore and some other countries — could save nearly 100,000 lives in the period up to 1 January 2021." https://t.co/BNDsx6IAKR
@jsprondel Schwierig. Die Putzhilfe kommen ja auch ins Haus, allerdings mit mehr Abstand. Aber Masken, richtig getragen, waren in der ersten Welle völlig ausreichend. Unklar, ob das auch bei den Mutanten noch hält. https://t.co/bDBzCRwW5u
RT @JeromeAdamsMD: @Daniell41347238 I get the confusion and frustration- I really do. And don’t blame people for having questions. But the…
@vanranstmarc Maskers waren voldoende in Missouri om een superverspreiding te stoppen... 139 klanten, nul transmissie. Maskers op de werkvloer. Simpel en doeltreffend. https://t.co/XSr7GRIkH1
@Daniell41347238 I get the confusion and frustration- I really do. And don’t blame people for having questions. But there is more and more science (both anecdotes and studies) showing that in public settings masks work. Here’s one: https://t.co/u8VM9iAF
RT @lfoquet: @SGeysenbergh ipv theoretisch denken, kijk eens naar plekken waar bepaalde sectoren open zijn. Ik voel me eerlijk gezegd veili…
@Coisbackeljau @terzaketv Duidelijk: https://t.co/XSr7GRIkH1
@SGeysenbergh ipv theoretisch denken, kijk eens naar plekken waar bepaalde sectoren open zijn. Ik voel me eerlijk gezegd veilig bij de kapper: beide mondmasker aan, vragenlijst aan deur, zwijgen tijdens knipbeurt, met kaart betalen, ... Duidelijk: https:/
@lindaholmes There's pretty solid clinical evidence that both parties masked and low capacity in a salon isn't really a concern. https://t.co/FcOL1fBLfM I found a place that is diligent about masks and distancing and got a haircut in July and then again t
RT @Balacla27914533: 5/Along with the @jeremyphoward paper which used flawed modeling and interpreted virus seasonality as having been a pr…
RT @Balacla27914533: 5/Along with the @jeremyphoward paper which used flawed modeling and interpreted virus seasonality as having been a pr…