RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
RT @charlesbrew: Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reaso…
Then there were the two hairdressers in Missouri who failed to infect their clients. Couldn't possibly be any other reason for that besides the masks, right!? Seriously, this is one of the most cited pieces of "research" in favor of masks. https://t.co/
@OldSeaClam @GovParsonMO An amazing way to protect the vulnerable including children. 😷 https://t.co/RtSlGlmWgM https://t.co/RtSlGlmWgM
@krf502 This is multiple studies and the results of those studies. Google the authors and mask. It was easier than posting the actual studies of 10 different studies. https://t.co/uMTji3F42t
@pezzertron @Saffiya_Khan1 @mo_brexit @AndyBurnhamGM @JuliaHB1 @TurboTurd77 Appears to be a tad more than anecdotal. https://t.co/aFiTtdDI5v
RT @DrLeonBlack: @JuliaHB1 @TurboTurd77 @AndyBurnhamGM Seriously, none? https://t.co/AlwFphG5oC
RT @DrLeonBlack: @JuliaHB1 @TurboTurd77 @AndyBurnhamGM Seriously, none? https://t.co/AlwFphG5oC
@JuliaHB1 @TurboTurd77 @AndyBurnhamGM Seriously, none? https://t.co/AlwFphG5oC
RT @YoSoyCoco_: Dato, no relato: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con #COVID19 atendieron 139 clientes en 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventil…
@itsonlythemoose @Telegraph There are several studies referred in this: https://t.co/CiUJKPj4T9 Eg. https://t.co/OxNMCZrGXZ Or: https://t.co/DesjEHq7df Or: https://t.co/UkCKXYwS1S There are several more studies you can click on in the article.
RT @YoSoyCoco_: Dato, no relato: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con #COVID19 atendieron 139 clientes en 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventil…
RT @YoSoyCoco_: Dato, no relato: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con #COVID19 atendieron 139 clientes en 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventil…
Dato, no relato: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con #COVID19 atendieron 139 clientes en 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventilación, pero con barbijo las dos partes. Hubo CERO contagios. Estudio publicado por el CDC: https://t.co/kG7WteW2iS #GobiernoDeInútile
@slippy_maxwell @ABC7 How many? Where are you getting your science from? Trumps ass? https://t.co/PA9rkAxyDH
@EhrineAshbark @NeilClark66 @Waterstones * "effective in stopping larger respiratory droplets" (but now we know it's spread via aerosol so this conclusion is not useful) > https://t.co/VmZGVNzgm9 * No control group, high number of participants declined
RT @MillerStream: The CDC bases their “expert knowledge” that masks work on 2 hairstylists who had COVID but wore masks so most of their cl…
@MountainAsh2020 @daveirl On masks here’s an example from the US that the CDC has on their website. IMO It demonstrates how masks can reduce the risk in commercial settings to an acceptable level while we’re waiting for vaccines, rather than masks being an
Dato, no relato: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con #COVID19 atendieron 139 clientes en 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventilación, pero con barbijo las dos partes. Hubo CERO contagios. Estudio publicado por el CDC: https://t.co/kG7WtfdDaq #GobiernoDeInútile
RT @jagsinghJPJ: @JuliaHB1 Your masked mandate came from a ‘study’ of two hairdressers!! While tens of other studies show they don’t work…
@ClarkeMicah @JuliaHB1 @spectator As you know, the study looked at effect to wearers, not the effect of transmission to others. Here are some studies that looked at that: https://t.co/WdXLyrbXJ3 https://t.co/ML8cW5BED7 https://t.co/0TftdrF5R6 https://t
@giggs_boson Willful ignorance: https://t.co/mW1bfTFWoy
@moonhare77 @DancerDad @ParisDaguerre Really ? This is new https://t.co/5B6pDFNFrM really ? This is old https://t.co/5oAhreXVLq really ? This is since Covid19 https://t.co/5oAhreXVLq
Dato, no relato: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con #COVID19 atendieron 139 clientes en 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventilación, pero con barbijo las dos partes. Hubo CERO contagios. Estudio publicado por el CDC: https://t.co/kG7WtfdDaq #GobiernoDeInútile
@JuliaHB1 Your masked mandate came from a ‘study’ of two hairdressers!! While tens of other studies show they don’t work. Who are the #covidiots. Go figure! https://t.co/Al4R92mOIW
RT @MillerStream: The CDC bases their “expert knowledge” that masks work on 2 hairstylists who had COVID but wore masks so most of their cl…
RT @MillerStream: The CDC bases their “expert knowledge” that masks work on 2 hairstylists who had COVID but wore masks so most of their cl…
RT @MillerStream: The CDC bases their “expert knowledge” that masks work on 2 hairstylists who had COVID but wore masks so most of their cl…
The cdc is less scientific than a elementary student.
RT @MillerStream: The CDC bases their “expert knowledge” that masks work on 2 hairstylists who had COVID but wore masks so most of their cl…
RT @Kingfreak491: If you knew you had COVID what are you doing working and exposing others knowingly?
If you knew you had COVID what are you doing working and exposing others knowingly?
RT @MillerStream: The CDC bases their “expert knowledge” that masks work on 2 hairstylists who had COVID but wore masks so most of their cl…
RT @MillerStream: The CDC bases their “expert knowledge” that masks work on 2 hairstylists who had COVID but wore masks so most of their cl…
RT @MillerStream: The CDC bases their “expert knowledge” that masks work on 2 hairstylists who had COVID but wore masks so most of their cl…
RT @MillerStream: The CDC bases their “expert knowledge” that masks work on 2 hairstylists who had COVID but wore masks so most of their cl…
RT @MillerStream: The CDC bases their “expert knowledge” that masks work on 2 hairstylists who had COVID but wore masks so most of their cl…
RT @MillerStream: The CDC bases their “expert knowledge” that masks work on 2 hairstylists who had COVID but wore masks so most of their cl…
🌎🤡
Unreal
The CDC bases their “expert knowledge” that masks work on 2 hairstylists who had COVID but wore masks so most of their clients didn’t get COVID. If a 7th grader were to submit this to his science teacher, he’d get a D. https://t.co/UVmY6YkAcj
RT @MillerStream: The CDC bases their “expert knowledge” that masks work on 2 hairstylists who had Covid but wore masks so most of their cl…
The CDC bases their “expert knowledge” that masks work on 2 hairstylists who had Covid but wore masks so most of their clients didn’t get COVID. If 7th grader were to submit this to his science teacher, he’d get a D. https://t.co/UVmY6YkAcj
RT @CaledonGary: @CP24 "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both the stylists and the…
@CP24 "Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both the stylists and the clients wore face masks, no symptomatic secondary cases were reported" https://t.co/u0a1LI6WpR
RT @YoSoyCoco_: Dato, no relato: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con #COVID19 atendieron 139 clientes en 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventil…
Dato, no relato: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con #COVID19 atendieron 139 clientes en 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventilación, pero con barbijo las dos partes. Hubo CERO contagios. Estudio publicado por el CDC: https://t.co/kG7WtfdDaq #GobiernoDeInútile
Thinking you don’t need mask- remember this? https://t.co/UgfFvx4hhD and don’t forget the cheese - as far as I can see, we just completely can’t rely on just one intervention https://t.co/nlC915rUNG
@dontbetyet You can’t have missed this /it’s from aaages ago
@davey1233 @Ljubica1 @JuliaHB1 You can’t control the test though, unless you want to purposely infect people with covid. Some countries have experienced super spreader events which will increase the risks. One anecdotal example was the two hairdressers (be
Dato, no relato: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con #COVID19 atendieron 139 clientes en 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventilación, pero con barbijo las dos partes. Hubo CERO contagios. Estudio publicado por el CDC: https://t.co/kG7WteW2iS #GobiernoDeInútile
@plutosaturn2 @BonnieCrombie There is no data that personal services are a source of transmission. If you want to talk about irresponsible I’ll wait for your condemnation of Ford allowing a gathering of thousands in London, or Trudeau ditching quarantine e
@robertjensen Nou dat onderzoek na onderzoek dat kun je wel verwijderen Robert, er zijn ook genoeg onderzoeken die het tegendeel bewijzen. https://t.co/pTjTriacU6
@Nuck_Chorris_NL @rianne666 @WalterW48247913 @123Max6 @RTLnieuws Daarnaast kan ik exact hetzelfde als jij, maar dan met onderzoeken en wetenschappelijke artikelen. https://t.co/pTjTriacU6
RT @YoSoyCoco_: Dato, no relato: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con #COVID19 atendieron 139 clientes en 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventil…
RT @YoSoyCoco_: Dato, no relato: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con #COVID19 atendieron 139 clientes en 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventil…
Dato, no relato: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con #COVID19 atendieron 139 clientes en 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventilación, pero con barbijo las dos partes. Hubo CERO contagios. Estudio publicado por el CDC: https://t.co/kG7WtfdDaq #GobiernoDeInútile
They should take them to court. With NO evidence of spread to back up Defendant’s claim, it would be interesting.
@erdocAA it's not following the science that's for sure https://t.co/bblylaYEKk
@Safetyman979 here's the peer reviewed study on the matter https://t.co/MRuOFU36zn
@pollert11 A teď fakta. Jen to, s čím pracovali naši legislativci už srpnu 2020. Mimochodem, při operaci roušku nosíte nebo ne? https://t.co/RupMFCzEH9 https://t.co/jhHUyj1dXz https://t.co/C7vgYRtpiE https://t.co/2ZxvN0UDZ1 https://t.co/bIhMKeDS76 https://
RT @Balacla27914533: 2/2 symptomatic hairstylists served 139 clients. No one got sick. If you read a little deeper, it is acknowledged that…
Dato, no relato: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con #COVID19 atendieron 139 clientes en 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventilación, pero con barbijo las dos partes. Hubo CERO contagios. Estudio publicado por el CDC: https://t.co/kG7WtfdDaq #GobiernoDeInútile
@RyanStrom @randymco @mdoy79 @jordanbpeterson @YouTube Even though I don't rely on surgical masks to prevent aerosol inhalation, they clearly worked in the Missouri hair salon case. Wild type has an expected attack rate of 58%. https://t.co/3ivLwY96Fe
@KiksBert Tuo "näyttö" perustui lähinnä kuulopuhetasoiseen tiedon keruuseen. https://t.co/ulZO40H5tF
@co2detective @sarap0621 @CFIB @fordnation They are essentially to the people who rely on this income to put food on the table. Put proper safety protocols in place and safely reopen business that should not he closed. https://t.co/MKBmnG1LnG
Dato, no relato: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con #COVID19 atendieron 139 clientes en 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventilación, pero con barbijo las dos partes. Hubo CERO contagios. Estudio publicado por el CDC: https://t.co/kG7WtfdDaq #GobiernoDeInútile
@QuentinFry Yep real world different from labs. There was also a powerful study of two hairdressers in Missouri that the CDC used to justify mask mandates for 330m people. https://t.co/ToOTQMjdTv
@MacNowak @PolaMatysiak @poselTTrela Serio? A co powiesz na pracę z kimś w jednym pomieszczeniu i jeszcze nachylanie się nad nim? Bez sensu te maseczki, prawda? A tu proszę, grubo ponad setka klientów, dwie zakażone fryzjerki i zero stwierdzonych zakażeń:
RT @JSchmukler: Esto es de JULIO DE DOS MIL VEINTE, y ya lo compartí varias veces pero va de vuelta. En Missouri, dos peluqueros SINTOMÁTIC…
@Dierenbach Follow the science, damn denier https://t.co/Mrdtiiv0ju
@PeterNY15 take a look at this: https://t.co/HOQHnCqhDm. I’d disagree with and you say the evidence has been incredibly strong and consistent for reduced transmission among those wearing masks. PPE works. you may be referring to “mask mandates” vs “mask w
RT @rtbrownjr: @justin_hart Or that the CDC long relied on an anecdote about 2 hair stylists in Missouri, and never did an RCT that might h…
@justin_hart Or that the CDC long relied on an anecdote about 2 hair stylists in Missouri, and never did an RCT that might have proven the point (or, of course, proven the negative). https://t.co/US3mVPLyaH
@krnmhndbll @neelwraae @EleLund Her er der lidt mere der taler for effekt af mundibind. Der var (næsten) ingen restriktioner under det danske studie. https://t.co/7R4UJn89kp https://t.co/lPU97C1mmX https://t.co/FR4JP38Hs7 https://t.co/YNCLaXsJh8
Datos: En 2020 dos peluqueros infectados con COVID atendieron 139 clientes a lo largo de 10 días. Sin distancia ni ventilación, pero con barbijo las dos partes. Hubo CERO contagios. Estudio publicado por el CDC: https://t.co/nBZenlZxLb #GobiernoDeInútiles
RT @JSchmukler: Esto es de JULIO DE DOS MIL VEINTE, y ya lo compartí varias veces pero va de vuelta. En Missouri, dos peluqueros SINTOMÁTIC…
RT @JSchmukler: Esto es de JULIO DE DOS MIL VEINTE, y ya lo compartí varias veces pero va de vuelta. En Missouri, dos peluqueros SINTOMÁTIC…
RT @JSchmukler: Esto es de JULIO DE DOS MIL VEINTE, y ya lo compartí varias veces pero va de vuelta. En Missouri, dos peluqueros SINTOMÁTIC…
RT @JSchmukler: Esto es de JULIO DE DOS MIL VEINTE, y ya lo compartí varias veces pero va de vuelta. En Missouri, dos peluqueros SINTOMÁTIC…