@Andysmalls13 @ZackStrength This is not a meta-analysis. This is a very poor, low level literature review. https://t.co/FRKgRhaysg https://t.co/D3gMt343Cn https://t.co/D3JQgU7fmS https://t.co/zr0tYpjGi9 https://t.co/zPFKqugLvj https://t.co/giNVjzzZD9
@JoeKerr57254356 @fleroy1974 @DankReject @SBakerMD @KenDBerryMD I’ll give you an example of what industry conflicts of interest really look like! And even then the research isn’t always wrong! The most quoted study by the plant based community is this to v
@marilyn_ella @lowcarbGP @LDLSkeptic @KenDBerryMD @DoctorTro @ifixhearts @DrScottMurray @bschermd @DrAseemMalhotra @lowcarb_aus @BrownAdey @AdrianSotoMota It's not about me vs them. Their opinions are not consistent with scientific consensus. https://t.co/
@Jwatwatkins @TyRBeal European Atherosclerosis Society gives 6 reasons why it is causal. People with genetically high LDC have high rates of heart disease deaths, while the converse is true for those with genetically low LDC ... https://t.co/OgmULlRMPg
Det här är förövrigt en sak som fler borde tänka på - LDL-C är en oberoende kausal riskfaktor för hjärtkärlsjukdom även om man i övrigt är normalviktig, motionerar och är rökfri. https://t.co/9gyiuygGOl
@mark_eats_meat @holmanm https://t.co/EcJgztxDB0 Let's look at some real science shall we?
@BHonorgaurd @Mangan150 Sorry, but there is sufficient evidence to establish a causal link between LDL cholesterol and coronary artery disease. You can refer to this paper which has been cited over 2000+ times I also just wrote a thread discussing both v
@ProfitLegend @Mangan150 No. We know exactly how LDL particles causes heart disease as well. It's full understood. Read this study: https://t.co/n119fmtAFP
@NoCarbsNation @AnimalBasedFood @Mangan150 "Consistent evidence from numerous and multiple different types of clinical and genetic studies unequivocally establishes that LDL causes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease." https://t.co/n119fmu8vn
@OMeriluoto @sonjatwilson @fredusirvio Se, että sinä et tiedä LDL:llä olevan (kausaali)yhteyttä ateroskleroosiin ei tarkoita, ettäkö sitä ei olisi "consistent evidence from numerous and multiple different types of clinical and genetic studies unequivocall
@Peej0413 @ElieJarrougeMD ruh roh.. https://t.co/3j3NuoP1RI
@FatAngryBoomer1 @ZackStrength "Consistent evidence from numerous and multiple different types of clinical and genetic studies unequivocally establishes that LDL causes ASCVD. " Do what you will with this information, but the facts are out...there's causa
@chilisa49836209 @hnjulio00 @AntelmPujol @consumogob https://t.co/trvxrqZ70o El LDL actúa como marcador subrogado a ApoB. El problema no es tenerlo elevado puntualmente si no, tenerlo elevado durante muchos años, el efecto es acumulativo. Si lo bajamos en
@Yo_soy_JulyR Aquí algunas referencias para consultar: https://t.co/Dk8AsmW6fk https://t.co/gcZxOkAPtm https://t.co/zrcgbrfgt0 https://t.co/L4d4u4H1kT https://t.co/qTo82NAl0w https://t.co/BY2b2ksF7i https://t.co/xZTN7ZXUvw Su tweet es un despropósito y si
@susanwoledge @ScepticalDoctor @ButterFueled https://t.co/EcJgztybqy the totality of the evidence shows us that LDL-c is very much a concern. The lower, for longer, the better
@disinfowars9 Two good papers on the matter worth reading: https://t.co/MUjjUQ4sCN https://t.co/XNimpH0Zf4
@pl8tocave Two good papers on the matter worth reading: https://t.co/MUjjUQ4sCN https://t.co/XNimpH0Zf4
@LoreofRunning1 @LDLSkeptic @bschermd @DrPaulMason @DrAseemMalhotra @malcolmken @DrEades @drericwestman Here's the source of the chart: https://t.co/vzheYEzdS9
@ClausCarlsen1 @Nope53640754 @moomoolabiff @javvta @LDLSkeptic @DoctorTro @BrianLenzkes @nicknorwitz There is more evidence backing LDLs causal role than anything else in modern medicine including RCT data from 200,000 subjects https://t.co/aZdTWgdf3s
@simselena20 @DriscollLizanne @AlastairMcA30 @doctor_oxford @gmcuk https://t.co/Cpy9etRyxY added to this consensus statement. I'd say yeah, you don't know what you are talking about. Back to the drawing board for you 👋👋👋
👉 Targeting LDL-C SOONER rather than LATER will provide a greater reduction in lifetime risk of cardiovascular event❤️ 👉 All strategies to lower LDL-C, irrespective of the underlying mechanism, will lower CVD risk @escardio Consensus Statement : https:/
@PauOller @balsalobrephd @consumogob En cuanta al riesgo cardiovascular. Aunque este financiado por farmacéutica, metodología y diseño es correcto, por lo tanto no se puede invalidar: https://t.co/UAE8oZTXUI
@AsarCadyn @Alkeryn @KenDBerryMD Both the naturally randomized genetic studies and the randomized intervention trials consistently demonstrate that any mechanism of lowering plasma LDL particle concentration should reduce the risk of ASCVD events.https://t
@PaulRBerg Regarding apoB: Hundreds of studies: epidemiological, clinical trials Mendelian randomization trials - see https://t.co/dBg9UTW2Oa and https://t.co/8qKqhnDZjW and https://t.co/u4YoqetsAw and https://t.co/iNQwGLHljv
@Chaddadbod @Theresa_Furey @Alpha_Omega592 @_CynthiaThurlow Vegan diet definitely superior to prevent CVD https://t.co/tNA6fMKt27
@DrJColeridge @narsvedge @NutritionMadeS3 @DrNadolsky Facts? From the book writers Uffe and Aseem?? OMG, evidence from large clinical trials demonstrates very clearly that lowering LDL cholesterol reduces our risk of death overall. NEVER get advice from me
(J'aurais dû mettre ce papier plus haut. Pour bien enfoncer le clou du lien entre LDL et maladies cardiovasculaires, ce papier est extrêmement puissant et mérite une lecture entière : https://t.co/sW1HJWdcz2) ⬇️ https://t.co/ZOSIKEbnL7
RT @dr_cois: https://t.co/9bxkHbpLwk https://t.co/pM9grOZK1O These #carnivore folks can be truly insufferable at times.
https://t.co/9bxkHbpLwk https://t.co/pM9grOZK1O These #carnivore folks can be truly insufferable at times.
@TheCarnivoreLaw @JayneReesBuxton @stedreefer And then chase that down with this paper from European Cardiology society which looks at Mendelian, RCTs and prospective cohorts which shows a tight relationship with LDL and CVD risk. The paper by Dr Malhotr
RT @EstebanDL: Uno de los ejemplos mayores de pseudociencia, que la corriente actual de cardiología ve como ciencia es este artículo Usar a…
RT @EstebanDL: Uno de los ejemplos mayores de pseudociencia, que la corriente actual de cardiología ve como ciencia es este artículo Usar a…
RT @EstebanDL: Uno de los ejemplos mayores de pseudociencia, que la corriente actual de cardiología ve como ciencia es este artículo Usar a…
RT @EstebanDL: Uno de los ejemplos mayores de pseudociencia, que la corriente actual de cardiología ve como ciencia es este artículo Usar a…
RT @EstebanDL: Uno de los ejemplos mayores de pseudociencia, que la corriente actual de cardiología ve como ciencia es este artículo Usar a…
Uno de los ejemplos mayores de pseudociencia, que la corriente actual de cardiología ve como ciencia es este artículo Usar a Hill para causalidad con algo que compone el sistema es ignorancia Hill se aplica a agentes externos https://t.co/bP9OgXNFrd Coin
@BetsyGoesGlam @ZahcM Slight reductions if you lower LDL enough <~60mg/dl https://t.co/Gw8Izgy6wB
@Guldtyr @BradStanfieldMD @PeterAttiaMD @hubermanlab You might find this of interest: https://t.co/pTZ4etePmx
To appraise the clinical and genetic evidence that low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). https://t.co/6OK5wVIeDW
RT @KoushikReddyMD: @KayLKelley @DrNadolsky @DrMarthaGulati @DBelardoMD Linking 2 papers. The consensus documents based on the totality of…
@KayLKelley @DrNadolsky @DrMarthaGulati @DBelardoMD Linking 2 papers. The consensus documents based on the totality of evidence from genetics, mechanisms, and various levels of clinical data. https://t.co/SotCqFgksc
@dmrind @DBelardoMD ApoB lowering reduces ASCVD events in ACS patients (PROVE-IT, ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, IMPROVE-IT) and stable CAD (4S, FOURIER, and REVEAL) EZE % lowering is similar w hi & mod-intensity statins. https://t.co/HhQSxwSqxV add’l links: https
@Nope53640754 @upda4_updates @DoctorTro @Drlipid @DrNadolsky How long will it take you to read this one? 6 months? A year? Maybe you need to go to college first. We will wait. https://t.co/1xHBI1HVge
@Nope53640754 @upda4_updates @DoctorTro @Drlipid @DrNadolsky We grown ups also don’t use “blog links”. Here you guy big guy https://t.co/1xHBI1HVge
@RootCauseDoctor Hi doctor. what do you say about these studies? https://t.co/XhKXOgc5o9
@scripwatch @bfhhealth Here you go : https://t.co/Rc7vrYQNik
@beeupset @Rhino_79_ @herbivore_club It's the amount and type of fat (and carbs) you eat that are important for your cholesterol levels, in particular ldl-c. That is a fact. And see also this study "uneqivocally establishing that ldl causes ascvd" https://
RT @ZahcM: How anyone can find the Euro "con-sensus" paper compelling is beyond me. But to each his own. I prefer this one: https://t.co…
@Greg86527593 @ifixhearts I’m sorry, but one person has not done more research than thousands of scientists working in this area for over 40 years! Here is a summary- https://t.co/arGY7LMHZA
@nakedathletes @ifixhearts @malcolmken I can. Here is the evidence. https://t.co/arGY7LMHZA
RT @ZahcM: How anyone can find the Euro "con-sensus" paper compelling is beyond me. But to each his own. I prefer this one: https://t.co…
RT @Drlipid: @DBelardoMD Danielle - that stunning remark asking "is there high-quality evidence or causal evidence about apoB" proves my po…
RT @Drlipid: @DBelardoMD Danielle - that stunning remark asking "is there high-quality evidence or causal evidence about apoB" proves my po…
How anyone can find the Euro "con-sensus" paper compelling is beyond me. But to each his own. I prefer this one: https://t.co/yjxW3ZyeNS
@JBianco215 @ifixhearts Here's a good review. The parts I find particularly compelling is the existence of multiple efficacious drugs working via different pathways. https://t.co/EszQPWsPnj
RT @Drlipid: @DBelardoMD Danielle - that stunning remark asking "is there high-quality evidence or causal evidence about apoB" proves my po…
RT @Drlipid: @DBelardoMD Danielle - that stunning remark asking "is there high-quality evidence or causal evidence about apoB" proves my po…
RT @Drlipid: @DBelardoMD Danielle - that stunning remark asking "is there high-quality evidence or causal evidence about apoB" proves my po…
@ifixhearts What is your take on this paper? https://t.co/9Qq9KfeQaX
@MattyHODL @ifixhearts Take a read. https://t.co/9Qq9KfeQaX
@pnwK8 @ifixhearts They have. https://t.co/9Qq9KfeQaX
RT @Drlipid: @DBelardoMD Danielle - that stunning remark asking "is there high-quality evidence or causal evidence about apoB" proves my po…
@DBelardoMD Danielle - that stunning remark asking "is there high-quality evidence or causal evidence about apoB" proves my point. Clearly the writer has not looked at the extensive literature (do simple pub med search) at all. Start here https://t.co/u4Yo
RT @Drlipid: @howardn @NutritionMadeS3 That "LDL" debate has been long settled. Read carefully - https://t.co/u4YoqetsAw and https://t.co/B…
@bobik314 @a_bazydloMD Wpływ ApoB na ryzyko chorób serca, stanowisko: https://t.co/c1liiSpU0L Co się dzieje jak farmakologicznie obniżymy czyjś cholesterol, metaanaliza: https://t.co/I0eHXYmp5U O tłuszczach nasyconych, i o tym że HDL wcale nie chroni prz
RT @theproof: The data is clear in that whether you look at genetic studies, observational studies or intervention studies the same general…
See his tweets
The data is clear in that whether you look at genetic studies, observational studies or intervention studies the same general relationship exists. Higher ApoB containing lipoproteins = higher risk of developing heart disease. PMID: 28444290 https://t.co
RT @Drlipid: @howardn @NutritionMadeS3 That "LDL" debate has been long settled. Read carefully - https://t.co/u4YoqetsAw and https://t.co/B…
@howardn @NutritionMadeS3 That "LDL" debate has been long settled. Read carefully - https://t.co/u4YoqetsAw and https://t.co/B35GAzqj2L
RT @Dallinar: @rashmeeushah @AnnMarieNavar @ericpetersonMD 1. LDL is linearly causal in ASCVD https://t.co/hhfDjR6TOL 2. Atherosclerosis is…
@rashmeeushah @AnnMarieNavar @ericpetersonMD 1. LDL is linearly causal in ASCVD https://t.co/hhfDjR6TOL 2. Atherosclerosis is a decades long process 3. Lifetime risk of ASCVD in females is 39% 4. Lipid lowering therapies are extremely safe and effective ev
@HighDensityLife @ifixhearts Thats not true. Causality was established trough evidence from RCTs, MRs, Kohorts and Mechanistic Studys. Triangulation was used. https://t.co/Rc7vrYQfsM So whats your issue with this Paper. Honest question, did you ever see
Butter contains high amounts of saturated fat, which like trans fat, increases LDL cholesterol. LDL is a causative risk factor for atherosclerosis.. https://t.co/8PXM4TVF4I
@jryandx There are multiple genetic causes of increased or decreased ldl/apoB particle levels. Read the original review in full. Then read this https://t.co/Ug1jQdWdYP Then this https://t.co/Iug7jxLUrn Again, it’s about as established as it gets
I remember from @LDLSkeptic @LDLskeptic2 the reference of a trial with corn oil, that did lower LDL but with had more decesead than the control.
@REV_Insulin_Res @KenDBerryMD Canola oil has less sat fat and more MUFA/PUFA compared with butter, which does lead to lower levels of LDL cholesterol. Speaking of which, there's evidence we should try to lower LDL if we want to reduce risk for CVD. https:
We literally have drugs that reduce CVD and INCREASE LDL!
We have a huge body of evidence that replacing SFA with MUFA and PUFA reduces LDL cholesterol https://t.co/Ltnq79WgLf And we know from a massive body of evidence that LDL is a causal risk factor in CVD https://t.co/zCJ1DIKZU0
@YesImaFed @Mangan150 @TyRBeal https://t.co/Cpy9eu99Wy the consensus statement on LDL
@MathieuChiasson @nicknorwitz Ah, you want evidence of causality, not mechanisms. The most compelling, IMO, is the consonance of a) genetic studies and b) experimental evidence via multiple different points of attack - on actual disease outcomes, not marke
@MasalaFry69 @ScepticalDoctor It feels weird to say this - I usually challenge notions on the other end of the LDL opinion spectrum - but the evidence that LDL is causal in heart disease is pretty overwhelming. If this is false, then chuck out 90% of medic