@AlexanderNordg8 @Essensielt_no Du lyver. Den studien som viste best effekt mot smitte, var på "bare" 90%. Aavitsland omtaler den her: https://t.co/YEyk71W663
@tveitmiljo @Essensielt_no Her burde jeg lenket direkte til denne: https://t.co/YEyk71W663
@NorthCountyDoc @eekymom @CDCgov @pfizer the record (largely due to other scientists pushing back on the claims). https://t.co/jsrxEOX8ti The 1st & only real-world study the CDC had done up until that date was this one: https://t.co/Uzx91or0iQ In it
@KetsVikno @RobertW08822183 @imjdsharp @krassenstein @FloridaPalms2 Citation Full segment: https://t.co/tZGAm4yULR These sentences overstated effectiveness & were inaccurate: - "The virus STOPS with EVERY vaccinated person" - "It [the virus] cannot
@Taj353 @tinkerb2007 @CaraNicAine @cmclymer That card is in lime with what the study she's talking about showed; which was that it was 90% effective @ preventing *infection* in the study participants over 3 months. https://t.co/Uzx91or0iQ She wasn't doing
@usappa00 @KarlaODell11 @marccair @BrodenStarJacob @Holden_Culotta @RobertKennedyJr @nytimes a host to go get more people." I don't know where that part came from, is what I mean, because it wasn't in the CDC report: https://t.co/Uzx91or0iQ Also, when she
@wobski421 @CredaCreda @1ainTro11sBots @bazcarter15 @cathyby @ShaneJa16905901 Walensky did oversell the effectiveness of the vaccines during that interview by speaking in broad terms like that. To the point the CDC had to issue a statement 3 days later wa
@CEWCEWCW @Elmaestrohombe @swd2 @elenor_candy @NBCNews The real-world data she was referring to is this study, published that same day: https://t.co/Uzx91or0iQ It showed that Pfizer & Moderna (J&J wasn't in it) were 90% effective @ preventing infec
@MFTruth413 @DonKeyusmc @ArthurSchwartz @WalshFreedom after the claims were made. In Belgium (all 3 people in the vid were talking about U.S. data in 2021). The study Maddow/Walensky (mis)spoke of (dated 3/29/21, same day of the broadcast). did not study t
@tveitmiljo @Essensielt_no @DidrikSoderlind "... at Senneset løy om at mRNA-vaksinen hadde smittereduserende effekt, hvilket hun gjorde, ..." mRNA-vaksinene har smittereduserende effekt, dog reduseres både den og sykdomsindusert immunitet raskere enn ønsk
@TheCIVICSc @GetSchwifyinere She was specifically on to talk about this study: https://t.co/8K1Pxe4mrZ
@pomai72818446 @HemiHobbs5150 @GSostakas @MarkWar16520311 The retraction was issued by a CDC spokesperson in the New York Times on 4/1/21. It's paywalled too (like Fortune, here's a readable archived link): https://t.co/jsrxEOXGiQ The CDC study: https://t.
@ATUnchaind @surracoisinluck @tpv_tragula @AuronMacintyre The study (published the same day of that show): https://t.co/Uzx91or0iQ Rachel's claims "The virus stop w/ EVERY vaccinated person" and "The virus cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go ge
@coleonshay878 @mazemoore @NBCNews With all due respect, I'm afraid that is mistaken. Examining the quotes: "The virus stops w/ EVERY vaccinated person" Note sure how that's truth if for Moderna & Pfizer, the study she's talking about said 90% effectiv
@OldSoul3333 @ChrisThomasNJ @david_ciolli @grynbaum @amandacarpenter The study: https://t.co/Uzx91or0iQ Also worth noting that by simply saying "vaccinated people", that could be taken to mean people who got J&J (like she did); but that vaccine wasn't
@DGrayTexas45 @catisold @WTP4621 @TimRunsHisMouth Her reporting was wrong. I've talked about why on here before too many times: https://t.co/hBMimoLpoY I don't know, is it that our wires got crossed & you are under the impression that I meant she did
@rubrogram @ToonFly73 @AndyShrimpton4 Walensky's is from 3/29/24 on the Rachel Maddow show. The CDC had just published their 1st (& only until that point) real-world study that same day: https://t.co/Uzx91or0iQ A 3 month study (perhaps not long enough
@SecularLad @SaladDongs @Towleegetshigh @dttpeople @TheOmniLiberal wasn't a study examining whether or not transmission can occur coming from vaccinated people who'd gotten a breakthrough case/infected. Hard to know what % of TV watchers looked up the stud
@slyyzo @Reineir72 @appalachiafrog @hannahsobusty @MLiamMcCollum She also said in the segment "it's not just in the clinical trials, but also in *real-world* data." CDC published their 1st real-world study that same day: https://t.co/Uzx91or0iQ And J&J
@ryanbeed @tawitterbanned @wannabeerbad @KinseyKat1 @TSchlanders @Censored4sure @TTAVOfficial I mean, I did post separately where I didn't use "lie" but could demonstrate embellishing the data. The response? You told me she got it from a 95% study. Didn'
@ryanbeed @ScotMAGA24 @tawitterbanned @wannabeerbad @KinseyKat1 @TSchlanders @Censored4sure @TTAVOfficial "True" that "if you get💉you 👉𝙬𝙤𝙣'𝙩👈(will NOT) get COVID? "True" until Delta? 95% "true"? 90% "true"? (pic 2, March 2021) https://t.co/Uzx91or0iQ
@ryanbeed @tonylinfreedom @wannabeerbad @KinseyKat1 @TSchlanders @Censored4sure @TTAVOfficial 90% If not a "lie", it was certainly misleading/embellishment. This was the data (their 1st real-world study): https://t.co/Uzx91or0iQ The claims she made there
@Thundahr @maid_julie @dbenner83 @RobertKennedyJr The issue here with her declaration is that she was claiming it came from findings included in a CDC study that was published that same day (3/29/21). However, the study didn't look @ transmission of the vi
@k1llcha1n @TrueCliffWash @linuxdaddy @Amer_icanbadass @CollinRugg @maddow One example of where her report was wrong can be observed @ the 0:45 mark. "It [the virus] cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people." She was (mis)reporting a
@danaparish @CDCDirector @CDCgov 75% reduction in asymptomatic infection 15-28 days after 1 dose of the vaccine. https://t.co/9fc4LCRmpo(21.../fulltext 80% is asymptomatic infections after 2-doses https://t.co/Zm3655eX34... 90% reduction in asymptomatic in
@Corvus3110 @truthscant @f_grimes3 @goddeketal Maddow's claim didn't reflect the findings of the study she (mis)reported on: https://t.co/Uzx91or0iQ For example, she also claimed (same segment) "The virus cannot use a vax'd person as a host to go get more
@caffeinatedsurf @GetSchwifyinere @DanLairdMD @kari_jerge “At the time, the CDC had a study showing it might stop transmission. That’s what Maddow reported. The study Rochelle Walensky was referencing was this one https://t.co/bNbEw7OICM There was no inv
@jdusse455 @fran1791125505 @Loan__Nguyen Oui, ça a été testé. T'as pas réussi à faire tes propres recherches ? C'est étonnant 😉 https://t.co/mJCGFHNmtI https://t.co/qXv7Ks2XmW https://t.co/gNpbeD2Cpb https://t.co/RCPbFzkE9l https://t.co/CtSrvJ6hSt ht
@JeremyFoub @StefanCuvelier @mdiplo Dès mars 2021 nous avions des études pour parler de cet effet de la vaccination. https://t.co/ANRdjRUhYU https://t.co/JSL2Ldqp7D https://t.co/C8RGDYcEro
@Censored4sure @BretWeinstein She deserves no credibility.
@vinceflibustier @ArthurDelaporte A-t-elle dit "les riches boivent du sang avec des paupières de bébés" ? Sinon c'est de la diffamation. D'accord avec vous sur le reste : rendons pénalement responsable ceux qui ont forcé ou encouragé l'injection de ce va
@Fred4Bonnet @lonnibesancon Non, de ce côté là pas trop de souci. https://t.co/tuE88LBhfZ https://t.co/GZxbkxYW7i https://t.co/fjPBbD1PM7 https://t.co/Xf5g0JgyMZ https://t.co/Bea7ojcDLv https://t.co/BhGUAOxxP7 🔽
@Alex22324434 @lonnibesancon @sauvagedavid75 C'est pour ça que l'effet sur l'infectiosité est toujours évalué après commercialisation du vaccin. Et ces évaluations ont commencé dès que la vaccination a commencé. https://t.co/tuE88LBhfZ https://t.co/GZxbk
@Wait__Helen @BuddyB04863931 @CEWCEWCW To be fair, her report wasn't entirely accurate. Full segment: https://t.co/ym0bjZ448Z "The virus cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people" for example. The study didn't look @ transmission of t
@LeafsRag @TheChiefNerd https://t.co/aZ4juIlaj6 You don’t read much
@susanovans @teniscat @MikeSington @MalcolmNance Here's the segment in full; directly from MSNBC's official YouTube channel (therefore, not doctored). https://t.co/cP7YTMtmTf She reported that a CDC study that was released the same day of her broadcast (
@00a03d @teniscat @MikeSington @MalcolmNance "The virus stops with *every* vaccinated person" I can't say she "lied" but I don't know if we could fairly call that accurate reporting either if the study she was "citing" didn't show that about the mRNA vacci
@TruBluRayne @GAVolb @GuntherEagleman @dustinemills24 @maddow @MSNBC For the sake of accuracy, indeed it was March 2021, but unfortunately it still wasn't accurate to the info that was known at that time, I'm afraid. On March 29, 2021, that report in the
@MardukTiamat333 @Buenrolloreturn https://t.co/iOhb8fkEeV el estudio del CDC
@Marc_Veld When vaccines match circulating strains better we can prevent up to 90% of infections https://t.co/mieUXnpTxm 5/
@QLexPipiens @Gabry_1966 @VedovaPierluigi Qui ci sono dati pubblicati su riviste prestigiose e siti governativi che dimostrano che con Delta i vaccini riducevano anche la trasmissione. Suppongo tu ne abbia di altrettanto attendibili che li smentiscono, ver
@david8029 @nard_turko @rcam_tv @EdKrassen @TuckerCarlson @joerogan @Timcast True. I should’ve said that study confirmed earlier findings. I believe this study from early 2021 was the one she was referencing. It’s also true she incorrectly stated studies s
@NinaHeistad @HansMagnusNils1 Hvordan har du allerede glemt at vaksinen ble introdusert som et smitteverntiltak ment for å stoppe smittespredningen? https://t.co/JYFxy3Hmbe https://t.co/WRmOTCaVxP
@TSNAVS @RunarSterdahl @piscesgutt Lyver Preben Aavitsland her? Lyver jeg når jeg sier at han hevder at vaksinen beskytter mot spredning? Eller er det du som lyver?: https://t.co/JYFxy3Hmbe https://t.co/vpX3rPeQN2
@TSNAVS @piscesgutt Hva er galt med kildene jeg har referert til tidligere? Her har du enda en: https://t.co/tjL33v3qwb
@PaavoRusava @ivanpuopolo Tässä yksi. Tosielämän "tutkimus" CDC sivuilta vuodelta 2021. 90% infektion ehkäisy. Täyttä 💩 puhetta. https://t.co/XDkecmcEmp
@MarceVann @loziovale71 @francolungro @Hipatia36538162 Se ora viviamo una vita normale senza restrizioni é proprio grazie a quei vaccini. Gli unici ossessionati che parlano ancora di pandemie, virus e tutto il cuccuzzaro sono i novax. Fatevi una vita. http
@caru_fred @loulou2745 @MathieuMolimard @ansm @FCREMIEUX @Sante_Gouv @sretailleau @EtienneGayat @sup_recherche @Eric__Berton @SFPT_fr Il y en a d'autres, avant cette date. Sachant que nous avions des doutes avec déjà l'observation d'une réduction de la c
@jack_hallen @Thecouchcoach11 @jfinglas2 @mail_american @maddow @alexwagner The CDC data she meant: https://t.co/Uzx91or0iQ ▫️It doesn't say what she claimed. It says it was 90% effective over a 3 month period in a studied group. ▫️ She says "every" vacc'd
@Liwformail @zabigfrench1 @clementfreze @MrSam144 Les études sont claires à ce sujet. Oui, la vaccination impacte favorablement la transmission. https://t.co/GSGsheHr16
@Liwformail @zabigfrench1 @clementfreze @MrSam144 Si 😉 Quelques exemples d'études montrant que la vaccination réduit la transmission : https://t.co/mJCGFHNmtI https://t.co/gNpbeD2Cpb https://t.co/CtSrvJ6hSt https://t.co/RCPbFzkE9l https://t.co/qXv7Ks2
@PraliNoisette @mimiryudo Protection against infection when vaccines are closely related to circulating variants
@jacktown03 @missmissy202 @IanCopeland5 @P_J_Buckhaults No evidence for any of those claims especially making up data. The results from the clinical trials were consistent to what was observed in real world studies. https://t.co/aZ4juIkCty https://t.co/f
@SaiyanBio The communication has however a few flaws, one of them being the lack of emphasis on variant specific vaccines protection against infection. They are a good match for circulating strains and even a temporary boost in protection against infection
@BoeckBernard @Luketheduke1960 @Yvonne781550689 @maneke68945622 @vanranstmarc @TomBombadon De effectiviteit v vaccin in onderstaand onderzoek werd bepaald over 3 maand. Waarbij de 14 dagen iedere vaccinatie niet werden meegenomen. 2 prikjes =1 maand ni
@Luketheduke1960 @Yvonne781550689 @BoeckBernard @maneke68945622 @vanranstmarc @TomBombadon https://t.co/lTIMc29uBG In de beschrijving : omdat immuniteit status na vax onbekend is wordt na elke prik 14 dagen niet meegerekend.
@Plandemie19 @laurenceteamhcl @BedelChristine C'est quoi dans le mot "tous" qui t'échappe ? "protection", c'est-à-dire? La transmission a été analysée sur des études terrain S1/2021. 5 exemples : https://t.co/mJCGFHNmtI https://t.co/qXv7Ks2XmW https://t.co
@SaiyanBio This fucking X app is messing up with QTing tweets https://t.co/WuRi8I5nXB
@docmattgyver @OlivierHertel @LePoint There’s massive amount of misinformation here. When vaccines match circulating strains well (which is the case) they can prevent up to 90% of infections
@19joho @Michigan_Noah Vaccines can prevent up to 90% of infections when they match circulating strains well. Getting the variant specific vaccine benefits everyone around you https://t.co/WuRi8I5nXB
@SaiyanBio Variant specific boosters diversify our immune landscape and when they’re a good match like this year, I’d be very surprised if Covid was common in people who get the booster based on neut titers and data reflecting protection against alpha http
@KindrachukJason First of all, get well soon. Your experience is a reminder that variant specific boosters are required to further reduce transmission. This year's one is a far better match for circulating strains. Our goal should be to achieve that again.
@GaryGareGare @Topiramatee We should always stay up to date with boosters. Variant specific boosters are a far better match. You can achieve this again https://t.co/mieUXnpTxm
@GaryGareGare @Topiramatee Variant specific boosters are game changers that are completely overlooked, your immune system is taught more mutations. When you have a better match, here’s what happens https://t.co/mieUXnpTxm
@Topiramatee I’d be very surprised if symptomatic infection was common in vaccinated individuals considering this year’s match for circulating strains
@VeloSimone @Lunesly_ No, when there’s a good match they can prevent up to 90% of infections. We can reach this performance again with variant specific boosters as they’re a good match for circulating strains
@Mira_24_ @C_A_Gustave Not on the long term, but one shot of XBB.1.5 specific vaccine will protect you until you get your new booster. When vaccines match circulating strains better, you can prevent up to 90% of infections. Get it
RT @m_ccini: Un gesto vale molto più di 1000 parole….tutto chiaro, non sapevo più dove aggrapparvi… https://t.co/hywVChNDCG
@C_A_Gustave @JPWeiland Of course not. When it matches your circulating strains, you can prevent up to 90% of infections. If you still get infected, it’s not a productive infection and you can’t transmit. Inversely, lower intrinsic severity + immune escape
@EpiEllie Totally puzzled here. We have a lot of evidence showing vaccines DO provide long lasting and robust protection against Covid. Variant specific boosters further reduce transmission. When it matches circulating strains well, you can prevent up to 9
We need to reduce infections altogether. Remember mRNA vaccines can prevent up to 90% of infections when they are a better match for circulating strains. An example here with Alpha that had 17 mutations on spike compared to WT 10/ https://t.co/WuRi8I5nXB
@CDCgov Poke @wanderer_jasnah @K_G_Andersen @angie_rasmussen we have data showing XBB.1.5 specific 💉 are a pretty good match for circulating variants BUT they are not recommended at population level to dramatically reduce infections altogether?! We can ac
RT @CLestuzzi: @mapurevoimah @Doctor_Gio_2 @m_ccini @piliani_zaolo @LaBombetta76 @giusbrindisi @robygt77 smettiamo di dire sciocchezze, per…
Un gesto vale molto più di 1000 parole….tutto chiaro, non sapevo più dove aggrapparvi… https://t.co/hywVChNDCG
@mapurevoimah @Doctor_Gio_2 @m_ccini @piliani_zaolo @LaBombetta76 @giusbrindisi @robygt77 smettiamo di dire sciocchezze, per favore. Il vaccino limita il contagio! E' dimostrato dagli studi sul personale sanitario, sottoposto a test periodici https://t.co
@nicolasberrod What we tend to forget is that when vaccines match circulating strains better, they dramatically reduce infections. Example here with alpha (17 mutations on spike vs WT) : vaccine prevented up to 90% of infections. Yes infections. 4/
@GYamey That guy again ? He’s going to ruin our booster campaign. The true benefits of boosters are at population level. See what we can achieve when boosters match circulating strains. Vaccines prevented 90% of infections when alpha was dominant