@ajlamesa I’m skeptical. 6-82% effective? CDC has max of 1.8% on their website https://t.co/W3H43anAsk https://t.co/Exk51HO6vE
RT @sweetdeesez: @natemax Why should anyone wear masks? The CDC’s own study from just a few months ago found the benefit so negligible, it…
RT @sweetdeesez: @natemax Why should anyone wear masks? The CDC’s own study from just a few months ago found the benefit so negligible, it…
@Culture_Rot @FelicityGirlsss @Nuclear_Kitties @Well_RN @gayguycandleco @MelissaJPeltier Hi fellow piece of shit! Your concern for long term side effects of vaccines is stupid. No vaccine has ever been found to have long term side effects. Never. This incl
@EcoSexuality @GovRonDeSantis What is your source for “masks would stop this”? Get serious. CDC’s paper even shows < 2% reduction in case growth rate. Hardly stopping. https://t.co/74WyRmVhpn
@ScottAdamsSays The CDC said mask mandates only reduced growth rates 2%. I call that worthless. This bulletin says they are statistically effective, but 2% is ineffective. https://t.co/TRBS027Zdo
RT @JuliaRaifman: Policy analyses: @health_affairs study indicates mask mandates all people were associated w/ reduced COVID, but mask pol…
RT @BlackPhysicists: @RepVernonJones @Forbes The fact is that masks do work. https://t.co/ti51ogMFhc https://t.co/HdnINShrvn
@RepVernonJones @Forbes The fact is that masks do work. https://t.co/ti51ogMFhc https://t.co/HdnINShrvn
RT @JuliaRaifman: Policy analyses: @health_affairs study indicates mask mandates all people were associated w/ reduced COVID, but mask pol…
@Jackson90771068 @rmh25250 @RevGregorySNeal @fthomas01 @MattWalshBlog There's dozens of academic studies showing the effectiveness of masks, here's one https://t.co/DHG0c8a6re Or you could just look at the states with high mask usage and better following
@MaskedResister1 @redsteeze Masks less than 2% effective, per CDC 2021-03-12: https://t.co/RLwViVA4VB
RT @JuliaRaifman: Policy analyses: @health_affairs study indicates mask mandates all people were associated w/ reduced COVID, but mask pol…
@AnitaKhalini @Gwwd3824 @LPPAorg This is table 1 from the cdc report. https://t.co/ZxcST0KRdH https://t.co/c8BFN6ppIM
RT @JuliaRaifman: Policy analyses: @health_affairs study indicates mask mandates all people were associated w/ reduced COVID, but mask pol…
RT @JuliaRaifman: Policy analyses: @health_affairs study indicates mask mandates all people were associated w/ reduced COVID, but mask pol…
RT @JuliaRaifman: Policy analyses: @health_affairs study indicates mask mandates all people were associated w/ reduced COVID, but mask pol…
@thecjpearson @RepVernonJones I understand the entertainment value of your campaign, but in real life, in the grown-up world, masks do help. https://t.co/0ScqKXebbM https://t.co/MUAJYkBoYI
RT @JuliaRaifman: Policy analyses: @health_affairs study indicates mask mandates all people were associated w/ reduced COVID, but mask pol…
RT @sweetdeesez: “Daily case and death growth rates before implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the refere…
RT @JuliaRaifman: Policy analyses: @health_affairs study indicates mask mandates all people were associated w/ reduced COVID, but mask pol…
Policy analyses: @health_affairs study indicates mask mandates all people were associated w/ reduced COVID, but mask policies for employees-only were not https://t.co/QBfQ7odAOL @CDCgov own analyses of face mask mandates: https://t.co/cyWWTKwts6
RT @sweetdeesez: “Daily case and death growth rates before implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the refere…
RT @rangermonk1: That .5% though, totally justified the increase in child suicide rates.
RT @rangermonk1: That .5% though, totally justified the increase in child suicide rates. https://t.co/2O1Yc49Q5r
RT @sweetdeesez: “Daily case and death growth rates before implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the refere…
RT @sweetdeesez: “Daily case and death growth rates before implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the refere…
RT @tarsnot: This is actually incredible. That the CDC even put this out is amazing. Bookmark it
RT @sweetdeesez: “Daily case and death growth rates before implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the refere…
RT @tarsnot: This is actually incredible. That the CDC even put this out is amazing. Bookmark it
RT @sweetdeesez: “Daily case and death growth rates before implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the refere…
That .5% though, totally justified the increase in child suicide rates.
@largegaydog @POTUS The CDC disagrees. 1.9% decrease in infection and death rate between 81-100 days... not very effective. https://t.co/GbHWtD0S0T
@kucherov_anton @BallouxFrancois It didn't. They were rising steadily in both states since September. It slowed more in North Dakota in January where the only policy difference was a 2-month mask mandate. https://t.co/WgNKfWD3sb https://t.co/vLEQTeuZv
@stbrorstenberg Sett ett par från amerikanska CDC men inga jättestora effekter. Masker kan som bäst vara en del av en lösning men ensamt räcker det inte långt https://t.co/9a9cCjbqTe
RT @xxQuizelxx: @histofarch @sourpatchlyds i searched cdc in my bookmark manager. found the updated study. scroll to the bottom and look at…
CDC bahkan sudah mengeluarkan studi tentang efek pembolehan makan di tempat umum yg akan menaikkan kasus & kematian dalam rentang 40-100 hari setelah aturan diberlakukan: https://t.co/bpkFliDV84
@jeneps "Follow the Science" https://t.co/ijIj3PKWAl
@histofarch @sourpatchlyds i searched cdc in my bookmark manager. found the updated study. scroll to the bottom and look at the table to draw your own conclusion. https://t.co/szgyIrti3g
@999mattyg @JeffreyPeel @Ian_in_SPACE Mask effectiveness estimated by the CDC at 2% reduction in 100 days... https://t.co/iEKqdxxEdT
@NMoonitz I’ve read the CDC’s own study on masks showing they don’t work over and over and can’t figure out what I’m not getting from it. https://t.co/ufZUPMUWfE https://t.co/JOTAGQogNU
RT @kylenabecker: Furthermore, mask efficacy with a population that is not at risk and with low mortality rates makes little sense. The CD…
@thehill Can't risk that .7% they help! https://t.co/ijIj3PKWAl
@BowenJp @brisco_0317 @TrishtheDish_7 @erichhartmann @HyperbolicLens @mamasaurusMeg @MomOnAMission30 @amzieaa @NBCNews Nope. We have the evidence that very much suggests otherwise: https://t.co/cuGiQV33D3
@mtgreenee @RepThomasMassie Especially when the @CDCgov’s own near year long study say makes don’t even work. #MaskUp is all theater designed to breed a generation of obedient youth to their communist masters. #CommunistDemocratParty https://t.co/uf
RT @kylenabecker: Furthermore, mask efficacy with a population that is not at risk and with low mortality rates makes little sense. The CD…
RT @sue_meadows11: But someone’s afraid of something.🤔
RT @kylenabecker: Furthermore, mask efficacy with a population that is not at risk and with low mortality rates makes little sense. The CD…
RT @sue_meadows11: But someone’s afraid of something.🤔
RT @sue_meadows11: But someone’s afraid of something.🤔 https://t.co/KNZ7n7DLik
RT @sue_meadows11: But someone’s afraid of something.🤔
RT @sue_meadows11: But someone’s afraid of something.🤔
@ksorbs Look at all the Karens on here that don't follow the science. The CDC has know since at least March that mask mandates make less than a 2% difference, at best, and possibly even less than that: https://t.co/RLwViVA4VB
RT @sue_meadows11: But someone’s afraid of something.🤔
But someone’s afraid of something.🤔
RT @kylenabecker: Furthermore, mask efficacy with a population that is not at risk and with low mortality rates makes little sense. The CD…
@brisco_0317 @BowenJp @HyperbolicLens @TrishtheDish_7 @mamasaurusMeg @erichhartmann @MomOnAMission30 @amzieaa @NBCNews I don't. You just refuse to look at it. Here's some: https://t.co/cuGiQV33D3
@HyperbolicLens @BowenJp @brisco_0317 @TrishtheDish_7 @mamasaurusMeg @erichhartmann @MomOnAMission30 @amzieaa @NBCNews That's not a study. It avoids all external factors like enforcement and compliance. Population, population density. Bsaically anything th
RT @kylenabecker: Furthermore, mask efficacy with a population that is not at risk and with low mortality rates makes little sense. The CD…
@longagnani @Alessia00286018 @VandelliMichela @LeucantLilium @cmgaston Questo è sufficiente? https://t.co/CSwzlPpKdN
@EasterWarshiper And here’s another report https://t.co/6uXecn4akO
RT @kylenabecker: Furthermore, mask efficacy with a population that is not at risk and with low mortality rates makes little sense. The CD…
DonaldJTrumpJr liked this tweet: https://t.co/oqD6Kmf4L8
@Pepite785 @PharmaDoc2 @flohin Avez vous des preuves de ce que vous avancez ? Selon l'estimation du centre des maladies infectieuses américain , le CDC , le port obligatoire du masque, a diminué au bout de 100 jours le taux d'infections de...2%. https://
RT @kylenabecker: Furthermore, mask efficacy with a population that is not at risk and with low mortality rates makes little sense. The CD…
RT @kylenabecker: Furthermore, mask efficacy with a population that is not at risk and with low mortality rates makes little sense. The CD…
RT @kylenabecker: Furthermore, mask efficacy with a population that is not at risk and with low mortality rates makes little sense. The CD…
RT @kylenabecker: Furthermore, mask efficacy with a population that is not at risk and with low mortality rates makes little sense. The CD…
RT @kylenabecker: Furthermore, mask efficacy with a population that is not at risk and with low mortality rates makes little sense. The CD…
RT @kylenabecker: Furthermore, mask efficacy with a population that is not at risk and with low mortality rates makes little sense. The CD…
RT @kylenabecker: Furthermore, mask efficacy with a population that is not at risk and with low mortality rates makes little sense. The CD…
RT @kylenabecker: Furthermore, mask efficacy with a population that is not at risk and with low mortality rates makes little sense. The CD…
Furthermore, mask efficacy with a population that is not at risk and with low mortality rates makes little sense. The CDC estimated daily case & mortality growth rate at just -0.9%-1.9% after 100 days. This is negligible in the childhood population.
RT @KeepingItFresh1: @dannorton111 @srn_blk @ABC Masks prevent spread. https://t.co/bPdJR0zCYG
@dannorton111 @srn_blk @ABC Masks prevent spread. https://t.co/bPdJR0zCYG
@LangmoreRoscoe @coreydidntdoit1 @j_g_allen I agree data analyses are challenging with much heterogeneity & time varying covariates, but we have good evidence masks are effective at state & county & individual level, such as the @CDCgov study b
@DougMustGo @adamcarolla https://t.co/CPxfGsMPpe https://t.co/UmO5s9khVY https://t.co/uPs6jqcG3o Looking forward to hearing how these are all fake
@elora_michelle @SenTedCruz Hmm, experts say that masks do nothing nor do separation, so maybe you should stop spreading misinformation. According to the CDC, masks reduce spread by less than 1.5%. https://t.co/rN5i65Zwjx
@ClaveauHerve @PoitrasDaniel1 @flstudiom4ster @wearynoticer @jhamel Mandating masks was associated with a decrease in daily COVID-19 case and death growth rates within 20 days of implementation. https://t.co/vDqaPLQTE5
@jpseidling @MartyMakary Here's a link to the CDC website where they describe mask mandates leading to decreases in cases and death rates in the first 9 months of the pandemic (https://t.co/at7qgUfNCM) https://t.co/RK6SSybbMf
@FletcherRaziel @hockey_walrus @SussusA14789098 @prageru Here’s a quick question why do masks lower transmission rates of Covid? https://t.co/bNxSlWTCaQ
@anthonyAJC @Voice4Victoria doesn't make me exactly comfortable in accepting the data. its not accurate as admitted, and the social interactions of the Chinese isn't exactly 'western'. I much prefer CDC data which shows around 1-2% efficacy rates 1-20 days
0.5% etki için mi maske zorunlu yani. Bir an önce maske zorunluluğunu kaldırın özellikle çocuklarda. @drfahrettinkoca @saglikbakanligi