↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the Guidelines of the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
185 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of the Guidelines of the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, October 2017
DOI 10.1002/cpt.762
Pubmed ID
Authors

PCD Bank, KE Caudle, JJ Swen, RS Gammal, M Whirl‐Carrillo, TE Klein, MV Relling, H‐J Guchelaar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 16%
Student > Master 18 11%
Other 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 46 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 32 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Unspecified 10 6%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 51 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#1,857
of 4,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,559
of 337,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#24
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.