RT @BrumReproTea: The paper we discussed can be found here: https://t.co/2exgp87KqT
The paper we discussed can be found here: https://t.co/2exgp87KqT
Great assembly on #transparency related empirical evaluations: trilogy across all biomedical literature, with special issues on social sciences👇(https://t.co/eMVHBEMDbv; https://t.co/QqQaNsq3b8; https://t.co/YRmNmLmP7L; https://t.co/Gxns25itWq; https://
RT @JoshuaDWallach: This works builds upon some of our earlier assessments of transparency, also published in @PLOSBiology: Reproducible R…
RT @JoshuaDWallach: This works builds upon some of our earlier assessments of transparency, also published in @PLOSBiology: Reproducible R…
This works builds upon some of our earlier assessments of transparency, also published in @PLOSBiology: Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature (w/Iqbal @MuinJKhoury et al.) https://t.co/nfILDvqbJ0
RT @JoshuaDWallach: This work builds upon our previous manual evaluations of transparency indicators in the biomedical literature. @Steli…
RT @JoshuaDWallach: This work builds upon our previous manual evaluations of transparency indicators in the biomedical literature. @Steli…
This work builds upon our previous manual evaluations of transparency indicators in the biomedical literature. @SteliosSerghiou developed an open-source, automated approach and evaluated 2.75 million articles on PubMed Central. https://t.co/5vLWuYoTEx h
@dougaparry @tdienlin @BrianNosek @g_theonion @UCBITSS "Transdisciplinary estimates for the prevalence of transparency and reproducibility related research practices" (https://t.co/y0x3FvWenM) poster summarises psyc (https://t.co/wmVTpF5r8c), soc sci (http
RT @IoanaA_Cristea: @dsquintana @Tom_Hardwicke @JoshuaDWallach @PLOSBiology Rejoinder also from @JoshuaDWallach (w/ John Ioannidis & Kevin…
RT @IoanaA_Cristea: @dsquintana There's actually quite a lot but I don't recall something showing this straightforward relationship. @Tom_H…
RT @IoanaA_Cristea: @dsquintana @Tom_Hardwicke @JoshuaDWallach @PLOSBiology Rejoinder also from @JoshuaDWallach (w/ John Ioannidis & Kevin…
RT @IoanaA_Cristea: @dsquintana @Tom_Hardwicke @JoshuaDWallach @PLOSBiology Rejoinder also from @JoshuaDWallach (w/ John Ioannidis & Kevin…
@dsquintana @Tom_Hardwicke @JoshuaDWallach @PLOSBiology Rejoinder also from @JoshuaDWallach (w/ John Ioannidis & Kevin Boyack): https://t.co/4p4xblNJg4 Then our own work (w/ @NaudetFlorian) in clinical psychology: https://t.co/b2wCdctuJb (published in
@dsquintana There's actually quite a lot but I don't recall something showing this straightforward relationship. @Tom_Hardwicke (already mentioned) has work on this in psychology, together w/ @JoshuaDWallach https://t.co/T3N4ptVFKx See also the classic @P
RT @Tom_Hardwicke: Context: this is data collated and summarised from four different research projects run by the @METRICStanford and @METR…
RT @Tom_Hardwicke: Context: this is data collated and summarised from four different research projects run by the @METRICStanford and @METR…
Context: this is data collated and summarised from four different research projects run by the @METRICStanford and @METRIC_Berlin groups. Biomed1: https://t.co/ayHjmFD5Tj Biomed2: https://t.co/NJB0BsRqXI Social Sciences: https://t.co/tyihVPhrw2 Psychology:
TFW an article on transparency and reproducibility in biomedical research provides its own source data...as a SAS dataset. https://t.co/pqfFtqQw1A
RT @JoshuaDWallach: Building upon previous evaluation of biomedical #transparency & #reproducibility (https://t.co/0Ov1pEkS7h): Improvement…
RT @JoshuaDWallach: Building upon previous evaluation of biomedical #transparency & #reproducibility (https://t.co/0Ov1pEkS7h): Improvement…
RT @JoshuaDWallach: Building upon previous evaluation of biomedical #transparency & #reproducibility (https://t.co/0Ov1pEkS7h): Improvement…
RT @JoshuaDWallach: Building upon previous evaluation of biomedical #transparency & #reproducibility (https://t.co/0Ov1pEkS7h): Improvement…
RT @JoshuaDWallach: Building upon previous evaluation of biomedical #transparency & #reproducibility (https://t.co/0Ov1pEkS7h): Improvement…
RT @JoshuaDWallach: Building upon previous evaluation of biomedical #transparency & #reproducibility (https://t.co/0Ov1pEkS7h): Improvement…
Building upon previous evaluation of biomedical #transparency & #reproducibility (https://t.co/0Ov1pEkS7h): Improvements in data sharing statements over time & more funding/COI information. Replication, protocol sharing...still rare. @PLOSBiology
論文で生データやプロトコルの記載がないよ、再現性どうなのよっていう報告。 エビデンス至上主義の人はこういうエビデンスの脆弱面も考慮したほうがよろしいですね。 https://t.co/6ffz0IfW3w
RT @Science_Open: Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature https://t.co/8NvoZotWt4 #openscience @P…
@AviAmit26 לא חדש . זה מצטרף לשורת דיווחים עח אי עקביות בפרסומים , מתודולוגיה ניגוד עניינים ועוד מכל טוב הארץ #PLOSBiology: Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature https://t.co/vOhSld6vYD מאוד מטריד
RT @AtorElabor: Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature – ScienceOpen https://t.co/ZMODnoAUAG
RT @AtorElabor: Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature – ScienceOpen https://t.co/ZMODnoAUAG
RT @AtorElabor: Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature – ScienceOpen https://t.co/ZMODnoAUAG
RT @Science_Open: Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature https://t.co/8NvoZotWt4 #openscience @P…
Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature – ScienceOpen https://t.co/ZMODnoAUAG
Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature https://t.co/8NvoZotWt4 #openscience @PLOSBiology
RT @SLouhimies: #PLOSBiology pinpointing concerns & providing baseline data to measure improvements in #research #reproducibility https://…
RT @SLouhimies: #PLOSBiology pinpointing concerns & providing baseline data to measure improvements in #research #reproducibility https://…
RT @SLouhimies: #PLOSBiology pinpointing concerns & providing baseline data to measure improvements in #research #reproducibility https://…
RT @pash22: Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature by John Ioannidis & @DrKhouryCDC https://t.c…
RT @SLouhimies: #PLOSBiology pinpointing concerns & providing baseline data to measure improvements in #research #reproducibility https://…
RT @SLouhimies: #PLOSBiology pinpointing concerns & providing baseline data to measure improvements in #research #reproducibility https://…
RT @pash22: Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature by John Ioannidis & @DrKhouryCDC https://t.c…
Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature by John Ioannidis & @DrKhouryCDC https://t.co/hrXnmvsyGD
RT @SLouhimies: #PLOSBiology pinpointing concerns & providing baseline data to measure improvements in #research #reproducibility https://…
#PLOSBiology pinpointing concerns & providing baseline data to measure improvements in #research #reproducibility https://t.co/R9tUF6gkgs
RT @akuksu: Closed source software can also cause a very low reproducibility of research #PLOSBiology https://t.co/v0PsflUPsw
RT @akuksu: Closed source software can also cause a very low reproducibility of research #PLOSBiology https://t.co/v0PsflUPsw
RT @akuksu: Closed source software can also cause a very low reproducibility of research #PLOSBiology https://t.co/v0PsflUPsw
Closed source software can also cause a very low reproducibility of research #PLOSBiology https://t.co/v0PsflUPsw
-Acceso público a datos crudos -Realización de estudios de replicación -Documentar financiación -Publicar informes revisores por pares https://t.co/dDAoBB59qJ
RT @KatharinaVolz: Following up on the article "why most published research findings are false" the reproducibility crises persists https…
A broader problem with biomedical research https://t.co/75gpYaiZ53 AND humans aren't 70 kg mice. https://t.co/hPnXO9wTg7
@MJIBrown @PubPeer @MicrobiomDigest Well a little bit of both https://t.co/iSgY96as8p
PLOS Biology: Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature https://t.co/PD6yL6XBNc
RT @florenciatevy: Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature via @PLOSBiology https://t.co/mJCnPRN…
Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature via @PLOSBiology https://t.co/mJCnPRNuji
@PGPapanikolaou μπα...αν θες για hoaxes για δες εδω (τον ξέρεις τον Γιαννη φανταζομαι ) https://t.co/7m5Tf4ddYA @Anatoli1813
RT @dataparasite: Of 441 random biomed articles published last 15 years, none made raw data available. Only 1 provided full protocol. https…
RT @dataparasite: Of 441 random biomed articles published last 15 years, none made raw data available. Only 1 provided full protocol. https…
RT @dataparasite: Of 441 random biomed articles published last 15 years, none made raw data available. Only 1 provided full protocol. https…
RT @dataparasite: Of 441 random biomed articles published last 15 years, none made raw data available. Only 1 provided full protocol. https…
RT @dataparasite: Of 441 random biomed articles published last 15 years, none made raw data available. Only 1 provided full protocol. https…
RT @dataparasite: Of 441 random biomed articles published last 15 years, none made raw data available. Only 1 provided full protocol. https…
RT @dataparasite: Of 441 random biomed articles published last 15 years, none made raw data available. Only 1 provided full protocol. https…
RT @dataparasite: Of 441 random biomed articles published last 15 years, none made raw data available. Only 1 provided full protocol. https…
RT @dataparasite: Of 441 random biomed articles published last 15 years, none made raw data available. Only 1 provided full protocol. https…
Στις βιοϊατρικές έρευνες 1/441 έδωσε πλήρες πρωτόκολλο-0/441 όλα τα δεδομένα.Σκεφτείτε τι γινεται σε άλλους τομείς https://t.co/7m5Tf4ddYA
RT @genetics_blog: Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature https://t.co/xlIKcCLOMm
RT @genetics_blog: Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature https://t.co/xlIKcCLOMm
Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature https://t.co/xlIKcCLOMm
RT @stevehit: Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature https://t.co/bWtN8Wfkvy #reproduciblescienc…
RT @KirkegaardEmil: Of 441 randomly chosen biomed studies (pub 2000–2014). ZERO had data openly available. https://t.co/40mPPFAD4Z #opensci…
RT @JelteWicherts: Of 268 randomly chosen empirical biomed articles, none provided access to raw data. Only 4 studies were replications htt…
RT @KirkegaardEmil: Of 441 randomly chosen biomed studies (pub 2000–2014). ZERO had data openly available. https://t.co/40mPPFAD4Z #opensci…
RT @dataparasite: Of 441 random biomed articles published last 15 years, none made raw data available. Only 1 provided full protocol. https…
RT @KirkegaardEmil: Of 441 randomly chosen biomed studies (pub 2000–2014). ZERO had data openly available. https://t.co/40mPPFAD4Z #opensci…
RT @carlystrasser: More evidence of lack of reproducibility/transparency in Biomed: https://t.co/lS8JLj2qfl in @PLOSBiology
RT @carlystrasser: More evidence of lack of reproducibility/transparency in Biomed: https://t.co/lS8JLj2qfl in @PLOSBiology
RT @dataparasite: Of 441 random biomed articles published last 15 years, none made raw data available. Only 1 provided full protocol. https…
RT @carlystrasser: More evidence of lack of reproducibility/transparency in Biomed: https://t.co/lS8JLj2qfl in @PLOSBiology
More evidence of lack of reproducibility/transparency in Biomed: https://t.co/lS8JLj2qfl in @PLOSBiology
RT @KirkegaardEmil: Of 441 randomly chosen biomed studies (pub 2000–2014). ZERO had data openly available. https://t.co/40mPPFAD4Z #opensci…
RT @KirkegaardEmil: Of 441 randomly chosen biomed studies (pub 2000–2014). ZERO had data openly available. https://t.co/40mPPFAD4Z #opensci…
RT @KirkegaardEmil: Of 441 randomly chosen biomed studies (pub 2000–2014). ZERO had data openly available. https://t.co/40mPPFAD4Z #opensci…
RT @dataparasite: Of 441 random biomed articles published last 15 years, none made raw data available. Only 1 provided full protocol. https…
RT @KirkegaardEmil: Of 441 randomly chosen biomed studies (pub 2000–2014). ZERO had data openly available. https://t.co/40mPPFAD4Z #opensci…
RT @KirkegaardEmil: Of 441 randomly chosen biomed studies (pub 2000–2014). ZERO had data openly available. https://t.co/40mPPFAD4Z #opensci…
RT @KirkegaardEmil: Of 441 randomly chosen biomed studies (pub 2000–2014). ZERO had data openly available. https://t.co/40mPPFAD4Z #opensci…
RT @KirkegaardEmil: Of 441 randomly chosen biomed studies (pub 2000–2014). ZERO had data openly available. https://t.co/40mPPFAD4Z #opensci…
RT @KirkegaardEmil: Of 441 randomly chosen biomed studies (pub 2000–2014). ZERO had data openly available. https://t.co/40mPPFAD4Z #opensci…
RT @KirkegaardEmil: Of 441 randomly chosen biomed studies (pub 2000–2014). ZERO had data openly available. https://t.co/40mPPFAD4Z #opensci…
RT @KirkegaardEmil: Of 441 randomly chosen biomed studies (pub 2000–2014). ZERO had data openly available. https://t.co/40mPPFAD4Z #opensci…
Top #openedu story: PLOS Biology: Reproducible Research Practices and Transpare… https://t.co/yExGzzaye0, see more https://t.co/vtUf0W3rg2
RT @OpenDataSalford: #PLOSBiology: Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature https://t.co/Jiw4ZA4jqc
#PLOSBiology: Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature https://t.co/Jiw4ZA4jqc
RT @KirkegaardEmil: Of 441 randomly chosen biomed studies (pub 2000–2014). ZERO had data openly available. https://t.co/40mPPFAD4Z #opensci…