↓ Skip to main content

Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 2: Preparticipation Screening for Cardiovascular Disease in Competitive Athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 2: Preparticipation Screening for Cardiovascular Disease in Competitive Athletes
Published in
Circulation, December 2015
DOI 10.1161/cir.0000000000000238
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barry J. Maron, Benjamin D. Levine, Reginald L. Washington, Aaron L. Baggish, Richard J. Kovacs, Martin S. Maron

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 25%
Other 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,378,342
of 17,521,884 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#3,416
of 17,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,204
of 291,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#83
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,521,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.