↓ Skip to main content

The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a committee opinion

Overview of attention for article published in Fertility & Sterility, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
Title
The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a committee opinion
Published in
Fertility & Sterility, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan Penzias, Kristin Bendikson, Samantha Butts, Christos Coutifaris, Tommaso Falcone, Gregory Fossum, Susan Gitlin, Clarisa Gracia, Karl Hansen, Andrew La Barbera, Jennifer Mersereau, Randall Odem, Richard Paulson, Samantha Pfeifer, Margareta Pisarska, Robert Rebar, Richard Reindollar, Mitchell Rosen, Jay Sandlow, Michael Vernon, Eric Widra

Abstract

The value of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) as a screening test for in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients has yet to be determined. Several studies demonstrate higher birth rates after aneuploidy testing and elective single-embryo transfer (eSET), suggesting the potential for this testing to decrease the risk of multiple gestations, though these studies have important limitations.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 199 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 16%
Other 23 12%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 43 22%
Unknown 44 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 50 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2019.
All research outputs
#792,269
of 16,275,012 outputs
Outputs from Fertility & Sterility
#321
of 7,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,705
of 282,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fertility & Sterility
#4
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,275,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.