↓ Skip to main content

Joint External Evaluation—Development and Scale-Up of Global Multisectoral Health Capacity Evaluation Process

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Infectious Diseases, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Joint External Evaluation—Development and Scale-Up of Global Multisectoral Health Capacity Evaluation Process
Published in
Emerging Infectious Diseases, December 2017
DOI 10.3201/eid2313.170949
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Bell, Jordan W. Tappero, Kashef Ijaz, Maureen Bartee, Jose Fernandez, Hannah Burris, Karen Sliter, Simo Nikkari, Stella Chungong, Guenael Rodier, Hamid Jafari

Abstract

The Joint External Evaluation (JEE), a consolidation of the World Health Organization (WHO) International Health Regulations 2005 (IHR 2005) Monitoring and Evaluation Framework and the Global Health Security Agenda country assessment tool, is an objective, voluntary, independent peer-to-peer multisectoral assessment of a country's health security preparedness and response capacity across 19 IHR technical areas. WHO approved the standardized JEE tool in February 2016. The JEE process is wholly transparent; countries request a JEE and are encouraged to make its findings public. Donors (e.g., member states, public and private partners, and other public health institutions) can support countries in addressing identified JEE gaps, and implementing country-led national action plans for health security. Through July 2017, 52 JEEs were completed, and 25 more countries were scheduled across WHO's 6 regions. JEEs facilitate progress toward IHR 2005 implementation, thereby building trust and mutual accountability among countries to detect and respond to public health threats.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 20%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 22 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2021.
All research outputs
#947,840
of 20,375,326 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#1,079
of 8,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,214
of 296,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#17
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,375,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.