↓ Skip to main content

A Web-Based Registry for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Heart, Lung & Circulation, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
A Web-Based Registry for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia
Published in
Heart, Lung & Circulation, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.10.019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn R Napier, Jing Pang, Leanne Lamont, Caroline E Walker, Hugh JS Dawkins, Adam A Hunter, Frank M van Bockxmeer, Gerald F Watts, Matthew I Bellgard

Abstract

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is the most common and serious monogenic disorder of lipoprotein metabolism that leads to premature coronary heart disease. Patients with FH are often under-treated, and many remain undiagnosed. The deployment of the FH Australasia Network Registry is a crucial component of the comprehensive model of care for FH, which aims to provide a standardised, high-quality and cost-effective system of care that is likely to have the highest impact on patient outcomes. The FH Australasia Network Registry was customised using a registry framework that is an open source, interoperable system that enables the efficient customisation and deployment of national and international web-based disease registries that can be modified dynamically as registry requirements evolve. The FH Australasia Network Registry can be employed to improve health services for FH patients across the Australasia-Pacific region, through the collation of data to facilitate clinical service planning, clinical trials, clinical audits, and to inform clinical best practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Psychology 1 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,721,594
of 12,354,050 outputs
Outputs from Heart, Lung & Circulation
#366
of 729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,644
of 267,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart, Lung & Circulation
#18
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,354,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 729 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.