| Title |
Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blood, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1182/blood-2016-08-733196 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hartmut Döhner, Elihu Estey, David Grimwade, Sergio Amadori, Frederick R Appelbaum, Thomas Büchner, Hervé Dombret, Benjamin L Ebert, Pierre Fenaux, Richard A Larson, Ross L Levine, Francesco Lo-Coco, Tomoki Naoe, Dietger Niederwieser, Gert J Ossenkoppele, Miguel Sanz, Jorge Sierra, Martin S Tallman, Hwei-Fang Tien, Andrew H Wei, Bob Löwenberg, Clara D Bloomfield |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 27% |
| Spain | 6 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 6 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Morocco | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 64% |
| Scientists | 15 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,747 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2742 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 342 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 287 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 264 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 242 | 9% |
| Other | 239 | 9% |
| Other | 512 | 19% |
| Unknown | 861 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 856 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 481 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 151 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 90 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 69 | 3% |
| Other | 175 | 6% |
| Unknown | 925 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 183. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#222,538
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#109
of 33,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,487
of 422,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#9
of 787 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 787 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.