↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1677 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel
Published in
Blood, January 2017
DOI 10.1182/blood-2016-08-733196
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hartmut Döhner, Elihu Estey, David Grimwade, Sergio Amadori, Frederick R. Appelbaum, Thomas Büchner, Hervé Dombret, Benjamin L. Ebert, Pierre Fenaux, Richard A. Larson, Ross L. Levine, Francesco Lo-Coco, Tomoki Naoe, Dietger Niederwieser, Gert J. Ossenkoppele, Miguel Sanz, Jorge Sierra, Martin S. Tallman, Hwei-Fang Tien, Andrew H. Wei, Bob Löwenberg, Clara D. Bloomfield

Abstract

The first edition of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adults published in 2010 has found broad acceptance by physicians and investigators caring for patients with AML. Recent advances, for example, in the discovery of the genomic landscape of the disease, in the development of assays for genetic testing and for detecting minimal residual disease, as well as in the development of novel anti-leukemic agents, prompted an international panel to provide updated evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations. The recommendations include a revised version of the ELN genetic categories, a proposal for a response category based on minimal residual disease status, and criteria for progressive disease.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,677 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 1671 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 252 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 208 12%
Other 176 10%
Student > Bachelor 171 10%
Student > Master 169 10%
Other 399 24%
Unknown 302 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 652 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 336 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 61 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 44 3%
Other 123 7%
Unknown 336 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#201,582
of 17,673,294 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#110
of 27,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,970
of 399,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#9
of 596 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,673,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 596 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.