| Title |
CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain — United States, 2022
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
MMWR Recommendations & Reports, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.15585/mmwr.rr7103a1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Dowell, Kathleen R. Ragan, Christopher M. Jones, Grant T. Baldwin, Roger Chou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 357 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 168 | 47% |
| Spain | 17 | 5% |
| Canada | 5 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 4% |
| Unknown | 143 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 261 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 54 | 15% |
| Scientists | 33 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 385 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 9% |
| Other | 32 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 17% |
| Unknown | 189 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 26 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 3% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 12% |
| Unknown | 202 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2720. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,707
of 25,901,238 outputs
Outputs from MMWR Recommendations & Reports
#2
of 214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85
of 443,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR Recommendations & Reports
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,901,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 129.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them