| Title |
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' Updated Interim Recommendation for Allocation of COVID-19 Vaccine - United States, December 2020.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.15585/mmwr.mm695152e2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathleen Dooling, Mona Marin, Megan Wallace, Nancy McClung, Mary Chamberland, Grace M Lee, H Keipp Talbot, José R Romero, Beth P Bell, Sara E Oliver |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 267 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 101 | 38% |
| Japan | 22 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Peru | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 212 | 79% |
| Scientists | 20 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 16 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 235 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 17% |
| Unknown | 92 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 42 | 18% |
| Unknown | 99 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2362. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,452
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#145
of 4,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195
of 528,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#12
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 335.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.