↓ Skip to main content

Guide and Position of the International Society of Nutrigenetics/Nutrigenomics on Personalized Nutrition: Part 2 - Ethics, Challenges and Endeavors of Precision Nutrition

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
Title
Guide and Position of the International Society of Nutrigenetics/Nutrigenomics on Personalized Nutrition: Part 2 - Ethics, Challenges and Endeavors of Precision Nutrition
Published in
Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics, June 2016
DOI 10.1159/000446347
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Kohlmeier, Raffaele De Caterina, Lynnette R. Ferguson, Ulf Görman, Hooman Allayee, Chandan Prasad, Jing X. Kang, Carolina Ferreira Nicoletti, J. Alfredo Martinez

Abstract

Nutrigenetics considers the influence of individual genetic variation on differences in response to dietary components, nutrient requirements and predisposition to disease. Nutrigenomics involves the study of interactions between the genome and diet, including how nutrients affect the transcription and translation process plus subsequent proteomic and metabolomic changes, and also differences in response to dietary factors based on the individual genetic makeup. Personalized characteristics such as age, gender, physical activity, physiological state and social status, and special conditions such as pregnancy and risk of disease can inform dietary advice that more closely meets individual needs. Precision nutrition has a promising future in treating the individual according to their phenotype and genetic characteristics, aimed at both the treatment and prevention of disease. However, many aspects are still in progress and remain as challenges for the future of nutrition. The integration of the human genotype and microbiome needs to be better understood. Further advances in data interpretation tools are also necessary, so that information obtained through newer tests and technologies can be properly transferred to consumers. Indeed, precision nutrition will integrate genetic data with phenotypical, social, cultural and personal preferences and lifestyles matters to provide a more individual nutrition, but considering public health perspectives, where ethical, legal and policy aspects need to be defined and implemented.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 234 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 19%
Student > Bachelor 43 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 13%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 9%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 34 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 51 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 10%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 50 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,665,855
of 11,505,507 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics
#17
of 87 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,486
of 275,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,505,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.