↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for the implementation of BRCA testing in the care and treatment pathways of ovarian cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Future Oncology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Recommendations for the implementation of BRCA testing in the care and treatment pathways of ovarian cancer patients
Published in
Future Oncology, September 2016
DOI 10.2217/fon-2016-0189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmine Pinto, Maria Angela Bella, Ettore Capoluongo, Paola Carrera, Claudio Clemente, Nicoletta Colombo, Laura Cortesi, Gaetano De Rosa, Francesca Fenizia, Maurizio Genuardi, Stefania Gori, Valentina Guarneri, Antonio Marchetti, Paolo Marchetti, Nicola Normanno, Barbara Pasini, Sandro Pignata, Paolo Radice, Enrico Ricevuto, Antonio Russo, Pierosandro Tagliaferri, Pierfrancesco Tassone, Mauro Truini, Liliana Varesco

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Other 4 12%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 12 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2016.
All research outputs
#10,216,591
of 17,455,239 outputs
Outputs from Future Oncology
#867
of 1,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,412
of 273,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Future Oncology
#20
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,455,239 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.