↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for genetic testing to reduce the incidence of anthracycline‐induced cardiotoxicity

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Recommendations for genetic testing to reduce the incidence of anthracycline‐induced cardiotoxicity
Published in
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, June 2016
DOI 10.1111/bcp.13008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Folefac Aminkeng, Colin J. D. Ross, Shahrad R. Rassekh, Soomi Hwang, Michael J. Rieder, Amit P. Bhavsar, Anne Smith, Shubhayan Sanatani, Karen A. Gelmon, Daniel Bernstein, Michael R. Hayden, Ursula Amstutz, Bruce C. Carleton, CPNDS Clinical Practice Recommendations Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 176 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 16%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 35 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 48 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,694,314
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#432
of 5,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,116
of 353,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#21
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.