| Title |
Guide and Position of the International Society of Nutrigenetics/Nutrigenomics on Personalised Nutrition: Part 1 - Fields of Precision Nutrition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lifestyle Genomics, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1159/000445350 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lynnette R Ferguson, Raffaele De Caterina, Ulf Görman, Hooman Allayee, Martin Kohlmeier, Chandan Prasad, Myung Sook Choi, Rui Curi, Daniel Antonio de Luis, Ángel Gil, Jing X Kang, Ron L Martin, Fermin I Milagro, Carolina Ferreira Nicoletti, Carla Barbosa Nonino, Jose Maria Ordovas, Virginia R Parslow, María P Portillo, José Luis Santos, Charles N Serhan, Artemis P Simopoulos, Antonio Velázquez-Arellano, Maria Angeles Zulet, J Alfredo Martinez |
| Abstract |
Diversity in the genetic profile between individuals and specific ethnic groups affects nutrient requirements, metabolism and response to nutritional and dietary interventions. Indeed, individuals respond differently to lifestyle interventions (diet, physical activity, smoking, etc.). The sequencing of the human genome and subsequent increased knowledge regarding human genetic variation is contributing to the emergence of personalized nutrition. These advances in genetic science are raising numerous questions regarding the mode that precision nutrition can contribute solutions to emerging problems in public health, by reducing the risk and prevalence of nutrition-related diseases. Current views on personalized nutrition encompass omics technologies (nutrigenomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, foodomics, metabolomics, metagenomics, etc.), functional food development and challenges related to legal and ethical aspects, application in clinical practice, and population scope, in terms of guidelines and epidemiological factors. In this context, precision nutrition can be considered as occurring at three levels: (1) conventional nutrition based on general guidelines for population groups by age, gender and social determinants; (2) individualized nutrition that adds phenotypic information about the person's current nutritional status (e.g. anthropometry, biochemical and metabolic analysis, physical activity, among others), and (3) genotype-directed nutrition based on rare or common gene variation. Research and appropriate translation into medical practice and dietary recommendations must be based on a solid foundation of knowledge derived from studies on nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics. A scientific society, such as the International Society of Nutrigenetics/Nutrigenomics (ISNN), internationally devoted to the study of nutrigenetics/nutrigenomics, can indeed serve the commendable roles of (1) promoting science and favoring scientific communication and (2) permanently working as a 'clearing house' to prevent disqualifying logical jumps, correct or stop unwarranted claims, and prevent the creation of unwarranted expectations in patients and in the general public. In this statement, we are focusing on the scientific aspects of disciplines covering nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics issues. Genetic screening and the ethical, legal, social and economic aspects will be dealt with in subsequent statements of the Society. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 556 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 548 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 112 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 12% |
| Researcher | 57 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 10% |
| Other | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 85 | 15% |
| Unknown | 151 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 84 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 73 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 75 | 13% |
| Unknown | 190 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,360,191
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Lifestyle Genomics
#12
of 159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,483
of 313,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lifestyle Genomics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.