↓ Skip to main content

Clinical practice guidance for next‐generation sequencing in cancer diagnosis and treatment (Edition 1.0)

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Science, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Clinical practice guidance for next‐generation sequencing in cancer diagnosis and treatment (Edition 1.0)
Published in
Cancer Science, September 2018
DOI 10.1111/cas.13730
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kuniko Sunami, Hideaki Takahashi, Katsuya Tsuchihara, Masayuki Takeda, Tatsuya Suzuki, Yoichi Naito, Kazuko Sakai, Hirotoshi Dosaka‐Akita, Chikashi Ishioka, Yasuhiro Kodera, Manabu Muto, Toshifumi Wakai, Kentaro Yamazaki, Wataru Yasui, Hideaki Bando, Yumi Fujimoto, Shota Fukuoka, Kenichi Harano, Akihito Kawazoe, Kimura, Shigehiro Koganemaru, Takahiro Kogawa, Daisuke Kotani, Yasutoshi Kuboki, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Shingo Matsumoto, Saori Mishima, Yoshiaki Nakamura, Kentaro Sawada, Sumito Shingaki, Kohei Shitara, Kumiko Umemoto, Shigeki Umemura, Kayo Yasuda, Takayuki Yoshino, Noboru Yamamoto, Kazuto Nishio, Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, Japan Society of Clinical Oncology, Japanese Cancer Association

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Other 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Lecturer 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 41%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 15 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,059,126
of 23,173,635 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Science
#1,477
of 2,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,963
of 336,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Science
#20
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,173,635 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,702 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.