↓ Skip to main content

Clinical practice guidance for next‐generation sequencing in cancer diagnosis and treatment (Edition 1.0)

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Science, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Clinical practice guidance for next‐generation sequencing in cancer diagnosis and treatment (Edition 1.0)
Published in
Cancer Science, September 2018
DOI 10.1111/cas.13730
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kuniko Sunami, Hideaki Takahashi, Katsuya Tsuchihara, Masayuki Takeda, Tatsuya Suzuki, Yoichi Naito, Kazuko Sakai, Hirotoshi Dosaka‐Akita, Chikashi Ishioka, Yasuhiro Kodera, Manabu Muto, Toshifumi Wakai, Kentaro Yamazaki, Wataru Yasui, Hideaki Bando, Yumi Fujimoto, Shota Fukuoka, Kenichi Harano, Akihito Kawazoe, Gen Kimura, Shigehiro Koganemaru, Takahiro Kogawa, Daisuke Kotani, Yasutoshi Kuboki, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Shingo Matsumoto, Saori Mishima, Yoshiaki Nakamura, Kentaro Sawada, Sumito Shingaki, Kohei Shitara, Kumiko Umemoto, Shigeki Umemura, Kayo Yasuda, Takayuki Yoshino, Noboru Yamamoto, Kazuto Nishio

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 18%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2019.
All research outputs
#9,242,246
of 15,097,478 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Science
#856
of 1,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,818
of 319,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Science
#8
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,097,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,273 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.