| Title |
Japanese Society of Medical Oncology Clinical Guidelines: Molecular Testing for Colorectal Cancer Treatment, Third Edition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Science, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cas.13617 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kentaro Yamazaki, Hiroya Taniguchi, Takayuki Yoshino, Kiwamu Akagi, Hideyuki Ishida, Hiromichi Ebi, Kaname Nakatani, Kei Muro, Yasushi Yatabe, Kensei Yamaguchi, Katsuya Tsuchihara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 24% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2018.
All research outputs
#16,638,094
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Science
#1,711
of 2,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,509
of 334,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Science
#22
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,907 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.