| Title |
Update: Interim Guidance for Health Care Providers Caring for Women of Reproductive Age with Possible Zika Virus Exposure — United States, 2016
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.15585/mmwr.mm6512e2er |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily E. Petersen, Kara N.D. Polen, Dana Meaney-Delman, Sascha R. Ellington, Titilope Oduyebo, Amanda Cohn, Alexandra M. Oster, Kate Russell, Jennifer F. Kawwass, Mateusz P. Karwowski, Ann M. Powers, Jeanne Bertolli, John T. Brooks, Dmitry Kissin, Julie Villanueva, Jorge Muñoz-Jordan, Matthew Kuehnert, Christine K. Olson, Margaret A. Honein, Maria Rivera, Denise J. Jamieson, Sonja A. Rasmussen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 130 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 57 | 44% |
| Spain | 6 | 5% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Paraguay | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 47 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 78 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 38 | 29% |
| Scientists | 11 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 277. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2020.
All research outputs
#131,170
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#880
of 4,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,343
of 315,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#16
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 336.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.