↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for UGT1A1 and Atazanavir Prescribing

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for UGT1A1 and Atazanavir Prescribing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, November 2015
DOI 10.1002/cpt.269
Pubmed ID
Authors

R S Gammal, M H Court, C E Haidar, O F Iwuchukwu, A H Gaur, M Alvarellos, C Guillemette, J L Lennox, M Whirl-Carrillo, S S Brummel, M J Ratain, T E Klein, B R Schackman, K E Caudle, D W Haas

Abstract

The antiretroviral protease inhibitor atazanavir inhibits hepatic uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1, thereby preventing the glucuronidation and elimination of bilirubin. Resultant indirect hyperbilirubinemia with jaundice can cause premature discontinuation of atazanavir. Risk for bilirubin-related discontinuation is highest among individuals who carry two UGT1A1 decreased function alleles (UGT1A1*28 or *37). We summarize published literature that supports this association and provide recommendations for atazanavir prescribing when UGT1A1 genotype is known (updates at www.pharmgkb.org). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 12 8%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 36 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 43 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,626,845
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#463
of 4,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,032
of 299,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#3
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.