↓ Skip to main content

Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider—a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider—a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, December 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41436-018-0391-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen L. David, Robert G. Best, Leslie Manace Brenman, Lynn Bush, Joshua L. Deignan, David Flannery, Jodi D. Hoffman, Ingrid Holm, David T. Miller, James O’Leary, Reed E. Pyeritz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Other 7 12%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Professor 5 9%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2019.
All research outputs
#12,286,688
of 15,464,348 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#1,944
of 2,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,270
of 383,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#74
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,464,348 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.