↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline for Thiopurine Dosing Based on TPMT and NUDT 15 Genotypes: 2018 Update

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline for Thiopurine Dosing Based on TPMT and NUDT 15 Genotypes: 2018 Update
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/cpt.1304
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary V. Relling, Matthias Schwab, Michelle Whirl‐Carrillo, Guilherme Suarez‐Kurtz, Ching‐Hon Pui, Charles M. Stein, Ann M. Moyer, William E. Evans, Teri E. Klein, Federico Guillermo Antillon‐Klussmann, Kelly E. Caudle, Motohiro Kato, Allen E.J. Yeoh, Kjeld Schmiegelow, Jun J. Yang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 189 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 41 22%
Unknown 40 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 37 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 46 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,513,851
of 14,547,054 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#272
of 3,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,837
of 379,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#9
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,547,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.