Title |
Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline for Thiopurine Dosing Based on TPMT and NUDT15 Genotypes: 2018 Update
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/cpt.1304 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mary V. Relling, Matthias Schwab, Michelle Whirl‐Carrillo, Guilherme Suarez‐Kurtz, Ching‐Hon Pui, Charles M. Stein, Ann M. Moyer, William E. Evans, Teri E. Klein, Federico Guillermo Antillon‐Klussmann, Kelly E. Caudle, Motohiro Kato, Allen E.J. Yeoh, Kjeld Schmiegelow, Jun J. Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 77% |
France | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 342 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
Researcher | 38 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 10% |
Student > Master | 23 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 6% |
Other | 63 | 18% |
Unknown | 125 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 51 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 4% |
Unspecified | 6 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 6% |
Unknown | 136 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,677,373
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#753
of 4,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,732
of 453,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#15
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.