| Title |
Genetic counselling and testing of susceptibility genes for therapeutic decision-making in breast cancer—an European consensus statement and expert recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Cancer (1965), November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.10.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian F. Singer, Judith Balmaña, Nicole Bürki, Suzette Delaloge, Maria Elisabetta Filieri, Anna-Marie Gerdes, Eli Marie Grindedal, Sileni Han, Oskar Johansson, Bella Kaufman, Mateja Krajc, Niklas Loman, Edith Olah, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Natalija Dedic Plavetic, Kamil Pohlodek, Kerstin Rhiem, Manuel Teixeira, D. Gareth Evans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 14% |
| Psychology | 11 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 47 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,396,821
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#4,864
of 6,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,732
of 446,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#52
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.