↓ Skip to main content

SEOM clinical guidelines in Hereditary Breast and ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Oncology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
SEOM clinical guidelines in Hereditary Breast and ovarian cancer
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12094-015-1435-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Llort, I. Chirivella, R. Morales, R. Serrano, A. Beatriz Sanchez, A. Teulé, E. Lastra, J. Brunet, J. Balmaña, B. Graña

Abstract

Approximately, 7 % of all breast cancers (BC) and 11-15 % of ovarian cancers (OC) are associated with inherited predisposition, mainly related to germline mutations in high penetrance BRCA1/2 genes. Clinical criteria for genetic testing are based on personal and family history to estimate a minimum 10 % detection rate. Selection criteria are evolving according to new advances in this field and the clinical utility of genetic testing. Multiplex panel testing carries its own challenges and we recommend inclusion of genes with clinical utility. We recommend screening with annual mammography from age 30 and breast MRI from age 25 for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy should be offered to women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, between 35 and 40 years and after completion of childbearing, or individualise based on the earliest age of ovarian cancer diagnosed in the family. Bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy is an option for healthy BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, as well as contralateral mastectomy for young patients with a prior BC diagnosis. BRCA genetic testing in patients with BC and OC may influence their locoregional and systemic treatment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 15%
Researcher 18 13%
Other 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 25 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 28 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2019.
All research outputs
#9,485,733
of 16,133,257 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#398
of 873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,586
of 347,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,133,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 873 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.