Impact of communicating personalized genetic risk information on perceived control over the risk: A systematic review

RT @CaulfieldTim: @DrewBaye @ConscienHealth There is actually a vast literature on this. Ted isn't just speculating. Willpower rarely - if…

RT @CaulfieldTim: @DrewBaye @ConscienHealth There is actually a vast literature on this. Ted isn't just speculating. Willpower rarely - if…

@DrewBaye @ConscienHealth There is actually a vast literature on this. Ted isn't just speculating. Willpower rarely - if ever - works on its own (https://t.co/nMrb0wQ3JW https://t.co/lCAaN5iWC4 There is also literature on fatalism (e.g., https://t.co/4n7M

@kylewalterdavis @SharonsScience Paper on fatalism: https://t.co/xsxmxgf3ZQ Yet again, "feedback of genetic risk information may have little impact on such beliefs." Our work has found DTC marketed on promise of behaviour change. Ditto much (but not all) o

.@YoniFreedhoff @DrMJoyner Yep. Even in context of fatalism, evidence underwhelming https://t.co/4n7MpGXkul #GeneticTesting

@MichelleNMeyer @MccabeCJM Actually, skeptical of all fatalism data. See eg https://t.co/GYIWKVJLH0. BL: Genetic risk info=ltd behav value