↓ Skip to main content

Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 3: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy…

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
Title
Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 3: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy and Other Cardiomyopathies, and Myocarditis A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology
Published in
JACC, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barry J. Maron, James E. Udelson, Robert O. Bonow, Rick A. Nishimura, Michael J. Ackerman, N.A. Mark Estes, Leslie T. Cooper, Mark S. Link, Martin S. Maron

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 244 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 13%
Other 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Student > Master 20 8%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Other 61 24%
Unknown 69 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 130 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 83 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,621,832
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#3,710
of 16,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,639
of 296,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#76
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.