↓ Skip to main content

Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 3: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 3: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy and Other Cardiomyopathies, and Myocarditis
Published in
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), December 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barry J. Maron, James E. Udelson, Robert O. Bonow, Rick A. Nishimura, Michael J. Ackerman, N.A. Mark Estes, Leslie T. Cooper, Mark S. Link, Martin S. Maron

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 165 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 17%
Other 24 14%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Other 47 27%
Unknown 22 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 65%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 35 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,568,131
of 17,362,547 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#3,519
of 13,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,036
of 373,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#63
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,362,547 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.