↓ Skip to main content

Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 3: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy…

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
18 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 3: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy and Other Cardiomyopathies, and Myocarditis
Published in
Circulation, December 2015
DOI 10.1161/cir.0000000000000239
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barry J. Maron, James E. Udelson, Robert O. Bonow, Rick A. Nishimura, Michael J. Ackerman, N.A. Mark Estes, Leslie T. Cooper, Mark S. Link, Martin S. Maron

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 20 17%
Researcher 16 13%
Professor 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 10 8%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 40 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 179. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#122,834
of 17,523,006 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#385
of 17,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,597
of 290,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#7
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,523,006 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.