| Title |
Mycobacterium bovis Infection of Red Fox, France - Volume 24, Number 6—June 2018 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3201/eid2406.180094 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lorraine Michelet, Krystel De Cruz, Sylvie Hénault, Jennifer Tambosco, Céline Richomme, Édouard Réveillaud, Hélène Gares, Jean-Louis Moyen, María Laura Boschiroli |
| Abstract |
Mycobacterium bovis infection in wild red foxes was found in southern France, where livestock and other wildlife species are infected. Foxes frequently interact with cattle but have been underestimated as a reservoir of M. bovis. Our results suggest a possible role of the red fox in the epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 30 | 36% |
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Panama | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 70 | 83% |
| Scientists | 7 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 11 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2018.
All research outputs
#714,198
of 25,399,318 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#865
of 9,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,691
of 342,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#13
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,399,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.