↓ Skip to main content

PathogenicLeptospiraSpecies in Insectivorous Bats, China, 2015

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Infectious Diseases, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
PathogenicLeptospiraSpecies in Insectivorous Bats, China, 2015
Published in
Emerging Infectious Diseases, June 2018
DOI 10.3201/eid2406.171585
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui-Ju Han, Hong-Ling Wen, Jian-Wei Liu, Xiang-Rong Qin, Min Zhao, Li-Jun Wang, Li-Mei Luo, Chuan-Min Zhou, Ye-Lei Zhu, Rui Qi, Wen-Qian Li, Hao Yu, Xue-Jie Yu

Abstract

PCR amplification of the rrs2 gene indicated that 50% (62/124) of insectivorous bats from eastern China were infected with Leptospira borgpetersenii, L. kirschneri, and several potentially new Leptospira species. Multilocus sequence typing defined 3 novel sequence types in L. kirschneri, suggesting that bats are major carriers of Leptospira.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 5 23%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Unspecified 2 9%
Mathematics 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,481,270
of 12,974,406 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#5,024
of 6,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,172
of 269,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#77
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,974,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.