↓ Skip to main content

Genomic Epidemiology of Global Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacter spp., 2008–2014 - Volume 24, Number 6—June 2018 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Infectious Diseases, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Genomic Epidemiology of Global Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacter spp., 2008–2014 - Volume 24, Number 6—June 2018 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
Published in
Emerging Infectious Diseases, June 2018
DOI 10.3201/eid2406.171648
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gisele Peirano, Yasufumi Matsumura, Mark D. Adams, Patricia Bradford, Mary Motyl, Liang Chen, Barry N. Kreiswirth, Johann D.D. Pitout

Abstract

We performed whole-genome sequencing on 170 clinical carbapenemase-producing Enterobacter spp. isolates collected globally during 2008-2014. The most common carbapenemase was VIM, followed by New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase, oxacillin 48, and IMP. The isolates were of predominantly 2 species (E. xiangfangensis and E. hormaechei subsp. steigerwaltii) and 4 global clones (sequence type [ST] 114, ST93, ST90, and ST78) with different clades within ST114 and ST90. Particular genetic structures surrounding carbapenemase genes were circulating locally in various institutions within the same or between different STs in Greece, Guatemala, Italy, Spain, Serbia, and Vietnam. We found a common NDM genetic structure (NDM-GE-U.S.), previously described on pNDM-U.S. from Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC BAA-214, in 14 different clones obtained from 6 countries spanning 4 continents. Our study highlights the importance of surveillance programs using whole-genome sequencing in providing insight into the molecular epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacter spp.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 33 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 39 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,912,332
of 23,978,283 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#5,590
of 9,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,042
of 333,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#64
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,978,283 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.