↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 Genotypes and Dosing of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
767 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
681 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 Genotypes and Dosing of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, June 2015
DOI 10.1002/cpt.147
Pubmed ID
Authors

J K Hicks, J R Bishop, K Sangkuhl, D J Müller, Y Ji, S G Leckband, J S Leeder, R L Graham, D L Chiulli, A LLerena, T C Skaar, S A Scott, J C Stingl, T E Klein, K E Caudle, A Gaedigk

Abstract

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) are primary treatment options for major depressive and anxiety disorders. CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 polymorphisms can influence the metabolism of SSRIs thereby affecting drug efficacy and safety. We summarize evidence from the published literature supporting these associations and provide dosing recommendations for fluvoxamine, paroxetine, citalopram, escitalopram and sertraline based on CYP2D6 and/or CYP2C19 genotype (updates at www.pharmgkb.org). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 681 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Unknown 677 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 95 14%
Student > Master 89 13%
Researcher 81 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 7%
Other 131 19%
Unknown 169 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 147 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 121 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 97 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 3%
Other 72 11%
Unknown 183 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,348,001
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#173
of 4,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,171
of 281,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.