@PaulFreemont @NatureComms I love this piece, but I also hope that the path forward can maximize diversity and the participation of “publics” in decision-making https://t.co/1WbpkS51P6
RT @E_Integrity_FR: #ARRIGE2019 This morning, Jennifer Merchant will chair the working group "public engagement" A good paper by Simon Bura…
RT @E_Integrity_FR: #ARRIGE2019 This morning, Jennifer Merchant will chair the working group "public engagement" A good paper by Simon Bura…
RT @E_Integrity_FR: #ARRIGE2019 This morning, Jennifer Merchant will chair the working group "public engagement" A good paper by Simon Bura…
RT @E_Integrity_FR: #ARRIGE2019 This morning, Jennifer Merchant will chair the working group "public engagement" A good paper by Simon Bura…
Rethink #public #engagement for #gene #editing https://t.co/wMFbe3UML5
RT @E_Integrity_FR: #ARRIGE2019 This morning, Jennifer Merchant will chair the working group "public engagement" A good paper by Simon Bura…
31/ So I'm on the next panel, here's a way in to much of what I'm going to be saying https://t.co/djitmmVrn6 #CrisprConsensus
How should gene editing be shaped by public engagement around the issue? Read more of @sburall's comment in @nature: https://t.co/So75TBqAO1
27/ He is exploring the role of the national committee as the centre of a network of ethics committees and conversations. potentially an element of the architecture I've laid out before https://t.co/djitmnd2LG #DHBIOdebat
How exactly does #publicengagement feed back to policy making in the UK? Is it done as systematic and throughout society as proposed in this comment: https://t.co/fMvaWcyPVm I doubt that we are anywhere close to that here in Germany. Any clues @melaniesmal
@oso @steiny @participatory @KialoHQ @OpenSociety 3/ and specifically what does engagement look like if we want the public to have control over technologies which have the power to redefine medicine, agriculture etc? https://t.co/djitmnd2LG
RT @sburall: She notes that a key part of this will be a local observatory of public attitudes to feed robust understanding of public persp…
She notes that a key part of this will be a local observatory of public attitudes to feed robust understanding of public perspectives into policy <and back again?. Here's what I wrote about this ... https://t.co/djitmnd2LG 17/ #updnextsteps
@CassieRobinson 3/ More naked self promotion, I wrote about this earlier this year in @nature https://t.co/djitmnd2LG
9/ she's excited by the idea of an independent body (which draws on my @NatureNews opinion piece https://t.co/djitmnd2LG.) Asks important questions about who will fund, what teeth it will have etc #genomeeditconf
RT @Clarissajaz: "There’s been little attempt to engage the public on the implications of the technology in a way that could alter the deci…
RT @Clarissajaz: "There’s been little attempt to engage the public on the implications of the technology in a way that could alter the deci…
"There’s been little attempt to engage the public on the implications of the technology in a way that could alter the decisions of scientists and policymakers" @sburall at @nature #Genomics #CitizenEngagement @balderash @angmgpp @XTroussard @fabianasc25
RT @kjkoch: Eric Topol: 2 excellent essays on ethics on genome editing @NatureNews #OA #CRISPR 1. call for an "observatory" by @SJasanoff B…
Eric Topol: 2 excellent essays on ethics on genome editing @NatureNews #OA #CRISPR 1. call for an "observatory" by @SJasanoff B Hurlbut https://t.co/u1x7Jk9yli 2. anticipate, map participation by @sburall https://t.co/6h509KPKJn https://t.co/QTusEwOIBt #me
... This is why we need sustained engagement and must move away from one off processes as all we do (back to my @NatureNews article - https://t.co/djitmnd2LG
RT @NashGibsonmusic: There goes #gene editing again @SarahRetroNerd @PeggyMercer https://t.co/PEPX1qe1xK
There goes #gene editing again @SarahRetroNerd @PeggyMercer https://t.co/PEPX1qe1xK
@BillGates Here @billgates identifies a number of significant benefits from #GeneEditing. He also notes the need active involvement of the public to ensure it is used to these ends. The question of how to do it is what I address in this @NatureNews piece h
RT @BioeticaPUJ: Participación pública y edición génica. #bioética https://t.co/qnUKqAsggz
Participación pública y edición génica. #bioética https://t.co/qnUKqAsggz
Rethink public engagement for gene editing https://t.co/aT7hAWeakW https://t.co/IMBQFp57PX
RT @AgBioWorld: Engaging the public on gene editing: Instead of waiting for an outcry about a specific potential application, governments a…
RT @AgBioWorld: Engaging the public on gene editing: Instead of waiting for an outcry about a specific potential application, governments a…
RT @AgBioWorld: Engaging the public on gene editing: Instead of waiting for an outcry about a specific potential application, governments a…
RT @AgBioWorld: Engaging the public on gene editing: Instead of waiting for an outcry about a specific potential application, governments a…
RT @AgBioWorld: Engaging the public on gene editing: Instead of waiting for an outcry about a specific potential application, governments a…
Engaging the public on gene editing: Instead of waiting for an outcry about a specific potential application, governments and key stakeholders must design a new kind of engagement. https://t.co/bAoFzLoDtd
RT @CRISPRjournal: "We advocate the establishment of a global observatory for gene editing... This would be an international network of sch…
RT @berggruenInst: The breadth of social and moral questions raised requires a new architecture for democratic debate https://t.co/H2SXJlQH…
RT @berggruenInst: The breadth of social and moral questions raised requires a new architecture for democratic debate https://t.co/H2SXJlQH…
My view is that we need robust public engagement about emerging biotechnologies, early in the process. So, obviously, I'm very happy to see this editorial by Simon Burall (@sburall ) in Nature. https://t.co/Tx5cF4CqPL … Part 1 of 2
Nice summary! https://t.co/mjNtynN8ys
RT @pdmillett: Rethink public engagement for gene editing https://t.co/dXGovuLrzn
Rethink #PublicEngagement for gene editing https://t.co/NSchkSvrDA
Instead of waiting for an outcry about a specific potential application, governments and key stakeholders must design a new kind of public engagement. https://t.co/tHrcuQIsXq
Rethink public engagement for gene editing https://t.co/dXGovuLrzn
Interedting article on a new ’architecture’ & purpose for #scicomm: Rethink public engagement for gene editing https://t.co/b0VHXIHkd7 - based on networks of publics - ’science’ just one node in network - listening & disseminating - about building
RT @NatureNews: There’s been little attempt to engage the public on the implications of gene editing in a way that could alter the decision…
RT @CRISPRjournal: "We advocate the establishment of a global observatory for gene editing... This would be an international network of sch…
Communicating science clearly to the public is paramount https://t.co/f0QN3RxLm6
RT @NatureNews: There’s been little attempt to engage the public on the implications of gene editing in a way that could alter the decision…
Agree with this. Did you see me banging on about this in @NatureNews and proposing a way of doing it systematically and sustainably? https://t.co/djitmnd2LG https://t.co/jJnTg2uBJw
RT @NatureNews: There’s been little attempt to engage the public on the implications of gene editing in a way that could alter the decision…
RT @PeterFRMills: Two pieces not to be missed in Nature: @sburall on rethinking public engagement for gene editing (https://t.co/IAR7xlcmOh…
RT @Jackstilgoe: Important argument from @sburall https://t.co/6B5JirmB32
RT @franknfoode: Rethink public engagement for gene editing. Which is worse, investing in a process to understand the landscape of opinions…
RT @Jackstilgoe: Important argument from @sburall https://t.co/6B5JirmB32
RT @Jackstilgoe: Important argument from @sburall https://t.co/6B5JirmB32
RT @Jackstilgoe: Important argument from @sburall https://t.co/6B5JirmB32
RT @Jackstilgoe: Important argument from @sburall https://t.co/6B5JirmB32
NatureNews: A new kind of engagement strategy must be designed for gene editing before a public outcry. https://t.co/v18BgmX4Fp
RT @Jackstilgoe: Important argument from @sburall https://t.co/6B5JirmB32
RT @Jackstilgoe: Important argument from @sburall https://t.co/6B5JirmB32
RT @Jackstilgoe: Important argument from @sburall https://t.co/6B5JirmB32
Important argument from @sburall https://t.co/6B5JirmB32
RT @euSMARTmap: Rethink public engagement for #geneediting by @sburall https://t.co/EN8SDn9zEl https://t.co/HS7XOJN324
RT @NatureNews: A new kind of engagement strategy must be designed for gene editing before a public outcry. https://t.co/yOEIUNrCF2
Is #CRSPR worth the media hype? We think so. #scicomm https://t.co/Fij3n9EAhQ
An engagement strategy for gene editing: connect people to science and policy debates, and connect scientists and policymakers to other people. #publicengagement #genetics https://t.co/5hC74XPt1X
The breadth of social and moral questions raised requires a new architecture for democratic debate, insists sburall https://t.co/UJiTZKnIJe
The breadth of social and moral questions raised requires a new architecture for democratic debate, insists @sburall https://t.co/EbTMqUWWo1
Where is This Taking Us and Are We Ready for the Radical Change It Will Entail? Rethink public engagement for gene editing https://t.co/aqGvJ1SwMl
RT @franknfoode: Rethink public engagement for gene editing. Which is worse, investing in a process to understand the landscape of opinions…
Rethink public engagement for gene editing https://t.co/IF3WlyUqtm
A new kind of engagement strategy must be designed for gene editing before a public outcry. #Genetics #CRISPR #policy #publicrelations https://t.co/kmButLxaww
RT @NatureNews: A new kind of engagement strategy must be designed for gene editing before a public outcry. https://t.co/yOEIUNrCF2
RT @franknfoode: Rethink public engagement for gene editing. Which is worse, investing in a process to understand the landscape of opinions…
RT @NatureNews: A new kind of engagement strategy must be designed for gene editing before a public outcry. https://t.co/yOEIUNrCF2
RT @franknfoode: Rethink public engagement for gene editing. Which is worse, investing in a process to understand the landscape of opinions…
RT @franknfoode: Rethink public engagement for gene editing. Which is worse, investing in a process to understand the landscape of opinions…
RT @franknfoode: Rethink public engagement for gene editing. Which is worse, investing in a process to understand the landscape of opinions…
RT @franknfoode: Rethink public engagement for gene editing. Which is worse, investing in a process to understand the landscape of opinions…
Rethink public engagement for gene editing. Which is worse, investing in a process to understand the landscape of opinions and concerns, or paying for it later through failure? @nature https://t.co/gc9wT7ynlB
RT @NatureNews: A new kind of engagement strategy must be designed for gene editing before a public outcry. https://t.co/yOEIUNrCF2
RT @PlantTeaching: Rethink public engagement for gene editing https://t.co/hozUjJ0RP3