| Title |
Expert consensus recommendations on the cardiogenetic care for patients with thoracic aortic disease and their first-degree relatives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Cardiology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.145 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Judith M.A. Verhagen, Marlies Kempers, Luc Cozijnsen, Berto J. Bouma, Anthonie L. Duijnhouwer, Jan G. Post, Yvonne Hilhorst-Hofstee, Sebastiaan C.A.M. Bekkers, Wilhelmina S. Kerstjens-Frederikse, Thomas J. van Brakel, Eric Lambermon, Marja W. Wessels, Bart L. Loeys, Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink, Ingrid M.B.H. van de Laar, Working Group on BAV TAA |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2018.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cardiology
#5,842
of 7,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#349,116
of 452,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cardiology
#96
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.